Demographical and clinical descriptive data.

<p>Demographical and clinical descriptive data.</p

Proportion of risky choices per condition in the Wheel of Fortune Task.

<p>Proportion of risky choices per condition in the Wheel of Fortune Task.</p

Proportion of risky choices per condition on the Wheel of Fortune Task.

<p>1 = -80(+20); 2 = -80(+80); 3 = -20(+20); 4 = +20(-80); 5 = -20(+80); 6 = +20(-20); 7 = +80(-80); 8 = +80(-20). Abbreviations: NW = Normal weight; OW = Overweight; OBS = Obesity. *Significant difference</p

Between groups differences in the number of disadvantageous choices in The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT).

<p>Between groups differences in the number of disadvantageous choices in The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT).</p

Final Path Analysis Model.

<p>Model 3 was the best representation of the observed relationship between variables and examined the complex associations between Body Mass Index (BMI), neuroimaging results and behavioral data. BIS-11 = Barratt Impulsiveness Scale; Standardized regression weights for direct effects are shown *p<0.05 **p<0.001.</p

fMRI task.

<p>Example images for Observe, Maintain and Regulate conditions.</p

In-Scanner Negative Emotion Intensity Ratings.

<p>Mean (95% Confidence Interval) in-scanner negative emotion ratings elicited during each condition (Observe, Maintain and Regulate) (n = 28) *p<0.05.</p

Sample characteristics and behavioral measure results.

<p>Sample characteristics and behavioral measure results.</p

PPI Results.

<p>PPI Results.</p

In-scanner Negative Emotion Ratings.

<p>In-scanner Negative Emotion Ratings.</p