6 research outputs found

    Advanced Practice Nursing in Singapore

    No full text

    Expecting the Unexpected

    No full text

    Understanding the influence of resilience on psychological outcomes — Comparing results from acute care nurses in Canada and Singapore

    No full text
    Background: Building resilience among nurses is one of the ways to support and retain nurses in the profession. Prior literature which evaluated influence of resilience on psychological outcomes, were conducted in relatively homogeneous populations. It is of interest to evaluate whether relationships between resilience and psychological outcomes remain consistent across nations and among different nursing populations. Aim: To evaluate a theoretical model of the impact of resilience on burnout (BO), secondary traumatic stress (STS) and compassion satisfaction (CS) by comparing results between nurses in Canada and Singapore. Method: A self-reported questionnaire consisting of questions on demographics, resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale), and psychological adjustment (Professional Quality of Life) was administered via an online survey. One thousand three hundred and thirty-eight nurses working in two Academic Medical Centres in Singapore responded to the online survey. Similar data was also collected from 329 nurses in Canada. Hypotheses were tested using structural equation modeling. Results: Resilience exerts a significant negative direct impact on STS, and a significant negative direct impact on BO. Additionally, resilience has a positive direct impact on compassion satisfaction. STS exerts a positive direct impact on BO while CS has a negative direct impact on BO. Conclusion: Current study affirmed significant associations between resilience and professional quality of life. Knowledge on resilience is key in informing design and implementation of resilience-building strategies that include professional development, and strengthening of interpersonal skills. A resilience-based approach will help reduce nurses' BO and STS while caring for their patients, and in turn reduce turnover

    Healthcare worker stress, anxiety and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore : A 6-month multi-centre prospective study

    Get PDF
    Aim The long-term stress, anxiety and job burnout experienced by healthcare workers (HCWs) are important to consider as the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic stresses healthcare systems globally. The primary objective was to examine the changes in the proportion of HCWs reporting stress, anxiety, and job burnout over six months during the peak of the pandemic in Singapore. The secondary objective was to examine the extent that objective job characteristics, HCW-perceived job factors, and HCW personal resources were associated with stress, anxiety, and job burnout. Method A sample of HCWs (doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, administrative and operations staff; N = 2744) was recruited via invitation to participate in an online survey from four tertiary hospitals. Data were gathered between March-August 2020, which included a 2-month lockdown period. HCWs completed monthly web-based self-reported assessments of stress (Perceived Stress Scale-4), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and job burnout (Physician Work Life Scale). Results The majority of the sample consisted of female HCWs (81%) and nurses (60%). Using random-intercept logistic regression models, elevated perceived stress, anxiety and job burnout were reported by 33%, 13%, and 24% of the overall sample at baseline respectively. The proportion of HCWs reporting stress and job burnout increased by approximately 1·0% and 1·2% respectively per month. Anxiety did not significantly increase. Working long hours was associated with higher odds, while teamwork and feeling appreciated at work were associated with lower odds, of stress, anxiety, and job burnout. Conclusions Perceived stress and job burnout showed a mild increase over six months, even after exiting the lockdown. Teamwork and feeling appreciated at work were protective and are targets for developing organizational interventions to mitigate expected poor outcomes among frontline HCWs.publishedVersionPeer reviewe
    corecore