39 research outputs found

    Unpacking complexity: GP perspectives on addressing the contribution of trauma to women’s ill health

    Get PDF
    Background: There is an intricate relationship between the mind and the body in experiences of health and wellbeing. This can result in complexity of both symptom presentation and experience. Although the contribution of life trauma to illness experience is well described, this is not always fully recognised or addressed in health care encounters. Negotiating effective and acceptable trauma informed conversations can be difficult for clinicians and patients. Aim: To explore the experience of primary care practitioners caring for women through a trauma informed care lens. Design and Setting: Qualitative study in the general practice setting of England, with reflections from representatives of a group with lived experience of trauma. Methods: A secondary thematic analysis of 46 qualitative interviews conducted online/by telephone to explore primary care practitioner’s experiences of supporting women’s health needs in general practice, alongside consultation with representatives of a lived experience group to contextualise the findings. Results: Four themes were constructed: you prioritise physical symptoms because you don’t want to miss something; you don’t want to alienate people by saying the wrong thing; the system needs to support trauma informed care; delivering trauma informed care takes work which can impact on practitioners. Conclusion: Health Care Practitioners are aware of the difficulties in discussing the interface between trauma and illness with patients, and request support and guidance in how to negotiate this supportively. Lack of support for practitioners moves the focus of trauma informed care from a whole systems approach towards individual clinician – patient interactions

    Palliative Approach for Aged Care

    Get PDF
    In Australia, many people ageing in their own homes are becoming increasingly frail and unwell, approaching the end of life. A palliative approach, which adheres to palliative care principles, is often appropriate. These principles provide a framework for proactive and holistic care in which quality of life and of dying is prioritised, as is support for families. A palliative approach can be delivered by the general practitioner working with the community aged care team, in collaboration with family carers. Support from specialist palliative care services is available if necessary. The Guidelines for a Palliative Approach for Aged Care in the Community Setting were published by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing to inform practice in this area. There are three resource documents. The main document provides practical evidence based guidelines, good practice points, tools, and links to resources. This document is written for general practitioners, nurses, social workers, therapists, pastoral care workers, and other health professionals and responded to needs identified during national consultation. Evidence based guidelines were underpinned by systematic reviews of the research literature. Good practice points were developed from literature reviews and expert opinion. Two ‘plain English’ booklets were developed in a process involving consumer consultation; one is for older people and their families, the other for care workers. The resources are intended to facilitate home care that acknowledges and plans for the client’s deteriorating functional trajectory and inevitable death. At a time when hospitals and residential aged care facilities are under enormous pressure as the population ages, such a planned approach makes sense for the health system as a whole. The approach also makes sense for older people who wish to die in their own homes. Family needs are recognised and addressed. Unnecessary hospitalisations or residential placements and clinically futile interventions are also minimised

    Outcomes and resource usage of infants born at ≤ 25 weeks gestation in Canada

    Get PDF
    Objectives: To determine the outcomes and resource usage of infants born at ≤ 25 weeks gestational age (GA). Methods: Retrospective study of infants born between April 2009 and September 2011 at ≤ 25 weeks\u27 GA in all neonatal intensive care units in Canada with follow-up in the neonatal follow-up clinics. Short-term morbidities, neurodevelopmental impairment, significant neurodevelopmental impairment, and resource utilization of infants born at ≤ 24 weeks were compared with neonates born at 25 weeks. Results: Of 803 neonates discharged alive, 636 (80.4%) infants born at ≤ 25 weeks\u27 GA were assessed at 18 to 24 months. Caesarean delivery, lower birth weight, and less antenatal steroid exposure were more common in infants born ≤ 24 weeks as compared with 25 weeks. They had significantly higher incidences of ductus arteriosus ligation, severe intracranial hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity as well as longer length of stay, central line days, days on respiratory support, days on total parenteral nutrition, days on antibiotics, and need for postnatal steroids. Neurodevelopmental impairment rates were 68.9, 64.5, and 55.6% (P=0.01) and significant neurodevelopmental impairment rates were 39.3, 29.6, and 20.9% (P\u3c0.01) for infants ≤ 23, 24, and 25 weeks GA, respectively. Postdischarge service referrals were higher for those ≤ 23 weeks. Nonsurviving infants born at 25 weeks GA had higher resource utilization during admission than infants born less than 25 weeks. Conclusions: Adverse outcomes and resource usage were significantly higher among infants born ≤ 24 weeks GA as compared with 25 weeks GA

    Association of Co-Exposure of Antenatal Steroid and Prophylactic Indomethacin with Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation

    Get PDF
    Objective: To evaluate the association of a combined exposure to antenatal steroids and prophylactic indomethacin with the outcome of spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) among neonates born at \u3c26 weeks of gestation or \u3c750 g birth weight. Study design: We conducted a retrospective study of preterm infants admitted to Canadian Neonatal Network units between 2010 and 2018. Infants were classified into 2 groups based on receipt of antenatal steroids; the latter subgrouped as recent (≤7 days before birth) or latent (\u3e7 days before birth) exposures. The co-exposure was prophylactic indomethacin. The primary outcome was SIP. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to calculate aORs. Results: Among 4720 eligible infants, 4121 (87%) received antenatal steroids and 1045 (22.1%) received prophylactic indomethacin. Among infants exposed to antenatal steroids, those who received prophylactic indomethacin had higher odds of SIP (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.14-2.28) compared with no prophylactic indomethacin. Subgroup analyses revealed recent antenatal steroids exposure with prophylactic indomethacin had higher odds of SIP (aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.15-2.43), but latent antenatal steroids exposure with prophylactic indomethacin did not (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 0.48-3.21), compared with the respective groups with no prophylactic indomethacin. Among those not exposed to antenatal steroids, mortality was lower among those who received prophylactic indomethacin (aOR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28-0.73) compared with no prophylactic indomethacin. Conclusions: In preterm neonates of \u3c26 weeks of gestation or birth weight \u3c750 g, co-exposure of antenatal steroids and prophylactic indomethacin was associated with SIP, especially if antenatal steroids was received within 7 days before birth. Among those unexposed to antenatal steroids, prophylactic indomethacin was associated with lower odds of mortality

    Development and evaluation of low-volume tests to detect and characterize antibodies to SARS-CoV-2

    Get PDF
    Low-volume antibody assays can be used to track SARS-CoV-2 infection rates in settings where active testing for virus is limited and remote sampling is optimal. We developed 12 ELISAs detecting total or antibody isotypes to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid, spike protein or its receptor binding domain (RBD), 3 anti-RBD isotype specific luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assays and a novel Spike-RBD bridging LIPS total-antibody assay. We utilized pre-pandemic (n=984) and confirmed/suspected recent COVID-19 sera taken pre-vaccination rollout in 2020 (n=269). Assays measuring total antibody discriminated best between pre-pandemic and COVID-19 sera and were selected for diagnostic evaluation. In the blind evaluation, two of these assays (Spike Pan ELISA and Spike-RBD Bridging LIPS assay) demonstrated >97% specificity and >92% sensitivity for samples from COVID-19 patients taken >21 days post symptom onset or PCR test. These assays offered better sensitivity for the detection of COVID-19 cases than a commercial assay which requires 100-fold larger serum volumes. This study demonstrates that low-volume in-house antibody assays can provide good diagnostic performance, and highlights the importance of using well-characterized samples and controls for all stages of assay development and evaluation. These cost-effective assays may be particularly useful for seroprevalence studies in low and middle-income countries

    The Fuzzy Felt Ethnography - understanding the programming patterns of domestic appliances

    No full text
    the programming patterns of domestic appliances

    Primary care practitioners’ experiences of peri/menopause help-seeking among ethnic minority women

    No full text
    Background: Each woman’s experience of the peri/menopause is individual and unique. Research shows ethnic minority women often have different experiences from their white peers, and these are not being considered in conversations about the menopause. Ethnic minority women already face barriers to help-seeking in primary care, and clinicians have expressed challenges in cross cultural communication including the risk that ethnic minority women’s peri/menopause health needs are not being met. Aim: To explore primary care practitioners’ experiences of peri/menopause help-seeking among ethnic minority women. Design and setting: Qualitative study design in the primary care setting of England, with PPI consultations. Methods: We sampled 46 primary care practitioners across 35 practices in England. Using an exploratory approach, we conducted online/telephone interviews and analysed the data thematically. We presented our findings to three groups of ethnic minority women, to inform our interpretation of the data. Results: Practitioners described lack of awareness of peri/menopause among many ethnic minority women which they felt impacted their help-seeking and communication of their symptoms. Cultural expressions of embodied experiences could offer challenges to practitioners to ‘join the dots’ and interpret experiences through a holistic menopause care lens. Our groups of ethnic minority women illustrated the practitioner findings with examples from their own experiences. Conclusion: There is a need for increased awareness and trustworthy information resources to help ethnic minority women prepare for the menopause, and clinicians to recognise their experiences and offer support. This could improve women’s immediate quality of life and potentially reduce future disease risk
    corecore