Evaluation of vardenafil for the treatment of subjective tinnitus: a controlled pilot study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Vardenafil (Levitra^®) represents a potent and highly selective phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor, which is established for treatment of various diseases. There are several unpublished reports from patients stating that vardenafil has a considerable therapeutic effect on their concomitant tinnitus. This pilot study was conducted to specifically assess the effect of vardenafil in patients with chronic tinnitus.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This trial was based on a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group design. Fourty-two consecutive subjects with mon- or binaural chronic tinnitus received 10 mg vardenafil (N = 21) or matching placebo tablets (N = 21) administered orally twice a day over a period of 12 weeks. Clinical examination and data acquisition took place at each visit: at baseline, after 4 weeks, after 12 weeks (end of treatment with study medication), and at non-medicated follow-up after 16 weeks. Assessment of clinical effectiveness was based on a standardized tinnitus questionnaire (TQ), the Short Form 36 health survey (SF-36), audiometric measurements (mode, pitch and loudness of tinnitus; auditory thresholds) and biomarkers of oxidative stress in patients' blood (malondialdehyde, protein carbonyl, homocysteine and total antioxidative status). Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated by comparison of subjective and objective parameters with baseline data between both treatment groups (ANCOVA).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Vardenafil had no superior efficacy over placebo in the treatment of chronic tinnitus during this study. The primary efficacy criterion 'TQ total score' failed to demonstrate significant improvement compared to placebo. Subjective reports of TQ subscales and general quality of life areas (SF-36), objective audiometric examinations as well as investigated biomarkers for oxidative stress did not reveal any significant treatment effects. The safety profile was favorable and consistent with that in other vardenafil studies.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Although hypoxia and ischemia play a special role in the pathogenesis of tinnitus, the PDE5-inhibitor-induced increase of nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatation exerted no specific influence on tinnitus symptomatology. Considering the unclear risk of rarely associated hearing impairment, systemic application of vardenafil or other PDE5 inhibitors prove to be not appropriate for therapy of chronic tinnitus.</p

EFFECT OF THE PHOSPHODIESTERASE 5 INHIBITORS SILDENAFIL, TADALAFIL AND VARDENAFIL ON RAT ANOCOCCYGEUS MUSCLE: FUNCTIONAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS

1. The anococcygeus muscle is part of the erectile machinery in male rodents. Phosphodiesterase (PDE) 5 inhibitors enhance and prolong the effects of cGMP, which has a key role in penile erection. The aim of the present study was to provide a functional and biochemical comparison of the three PDE5 inhibitors, namely sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil, in the rat anococcygeus muscle. 2. Muscle strips were mounted in 4 mL organ baths and isometric force recorded. Levels of cGMP were measured using an enzyme immunoassay kit. Western blots were used to determine PDE5 protein expression. 3. The PDE5 inhibitors concentration-dependently relaxed carbachol-precontracted anococcygeus muscle; however, vardenafil was more potent (pEC(50) =8.11 +/- 0.05) than sildenafil (7.72 +/- 0.06) or tadalafil (7.69 +/- 0.05). Addition of N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (100 mu mol/L) or 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (10 mu mol/L) to the organ baths caused significant rightward shifts in concentration-response curves for all PDE5 inhibitors. 4. Sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil (all at 0.1 mu mol/L) caused leftward shifts in the glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) concentration-response curves (by 4.0-, 3.7- and 5.5-fold, respectively). In addition, all three PDE5 inhibitors significantly potentiated relaxation responses to both GTN (0.01-10 mu mol/L) and electrical field stimulation (EFS; 1-32 Hz), with vardenafil having more pronounced effects. 5. All three PDE5 inhibitors reduced EFS-evoked contractions in a concentration-dependent manner over the concentration range 0.001-1 mu mol/L. There were no significant differences between the effects of the three PDE5 inhibitors. 6. Vardenafil (0.01-0.1 mu mol/L) was more potent in preventing cGMP degradation in vitro than sildenafil (0.01-0.1 mu mol/L) and tadalafil (0.01-0.1 mu mol/L). 7. Under control conditions, the expression of PDE5 was higher in the anococcygeus muscle than in the corpus cavernosum. 8. In conclusion, PDE5 inhibitors enhance exogenous and endogenous nitric oxide-mediated relaxation in the rat anococcygeus muscle. The potency of vardenafil was greater than that of either sildenafil or tadalafil.36435836