10 research outputs found
Effects of time and trait anxiety or occupation type on FCV-19S scores for 100 weeks<sup>†</sup> or earlier and after 100 weeks.
†The day of the COVID-19 outbreak in Japan is defined as “week 1” (January 16, 2020). *Statistical significance after Bonferroni correction (p (DOCX)</p
Effects of time and trait anxiety or occupation type on K6 scores for 100 weeks<sup>†</sup> or earlier and after 100 weeks.
†The day of the COVID-19 outbreak in Japan is defined as “week 1” (January 16, 2020). *Statistical significance after Bonferroni correction (p (DOCX)</p
Changes in K6 and FCV-19S scores by occupation type and number of newly infected cases.
Changes in K6 (A) or FCV-19S (B) scores were shown by occupation type and number of newly infected cases during the observational period. Error bar indicates SEM.</p
Effects of time and trait anxiety on FCV-19S scores during the total observation period.
Effects of time and trait anxiety on FCV-19S scores during the total observation period.</p
S2 File -
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic provides a unique opportunity studying individual differences in the trajectory of mental distress to relatively homogeneous stressors by longitudinally examining time-course changes between pandemic waves. For 21 months, we tested the effects of COVID-19 waves on mental health among 545 staffs at 18 hospitals treating COVID-19 patients in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan. Contrary to increasing new infected cases as waves progressed, initially elevated psychological distress (K6) and fear of COVID-19 (FCV-19S) were decreased among waves (K6: B = -.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -.03 to -.01; FCV-19S: B = -.10, 95% CI = -.16 to -.04). This initial increase and subsequent decrease in K6 and FCV-19S were more prominent in individuals with high trait anxiety (K6: B = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.18 to 1.91; FCV-19S: B = 4.27, 95% CI = 2.50 to 6.04) and in occupations other than physicians or nurses. The current study revealed time-course changes in psychological distress and fear regarding COVID-19 in each pandemic wave and across waves, and indicated the usefulness of trait anxiety and occupation as predictors of mental health outcomes.</div
Changes in K6 and FCV-19S scores by level of trait anxiety and number of newly infected cases.
Changes in K6 (A) or FCV-19S (B) scores were shown by level of trait anxiety and number of newly infected cases during the observational period. Error bar indicates standard error of the mean (SEM).</p
Demographic characteristics and clinical measures at baseline.
Demographic characteristics and clinical measures at baseline.</p
Effects of time and trait anxiety on K6 scores during the total observation period.
Effects of time and trait anxiety on K6 scores during the total observation period.</p
Weekly average number of newly infected COVID-19 cases and K6 or FCV-19S scores.
Weekly average number of newly infected COVID-19 cases and K6 (A) or FCV-19S (B) scores were shown during the observation period. (TIF)</p
S1 File -
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic provides a unique opportunity studying individual differences in the trajectory of mental distress to relatively homogeneous stressors by longitudinally examining time-course changes between pandemic waves. For 21 months, we tested the effects of COVID-19 waves on mental health among 545 staffs at 18 hospitals treating COVID-19 patients in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan. Contrary to increasing new infected cases as waves progressed, initially elevated psychological distress (K6) and fear of COVID-19 (FCV-19S) were decreased among waves (K6: B = -.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -.03 to -.01; FCV-19S: B = -.10, 95% CI = -.16 to -.04). This initial increase and subsequent decrease in K6 and FCV-19S were more prominent in individuals with high trait anxiety (K6: B = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.18 to 1.91; FCV-19S: B = 4.27, 95% CI = 2.50 to 6.04) and in occupations other than physicians or nurses. The current study revealed time-course changes in psychological distress and fear regarding COVID-19 in each pandemic wave and across waves, and indicated the usefulness of trait anxiety and occupation as predictors of mental health outcomes.</div