12 research outputs found

    MOESM5 of MALDI-TOF peptidomic analysis of serum and post-prostatic massage urine specimens to identify prostate cancer biomarkers

    No full text
    Additional file 5: Results. Monte Carlo simulations results confirmed that substituting the limit of detection (LOD) with LOD/2 does not affect the reliability of ICC estimation; The measurement error structure of peptidomi MALDI-TOF/MS-based analysis of the urinary and serum feature

    MOESM3 of MALDI-TOF peptidomic analysis of serum and post-prostatic massage urine specimens to identify prostate cancer biomarkers

    No full text
    Additional file 3: Table S1. Monte Carlo simulation results. The ICC estimates were obtained by increasing the measurement error (σε) from 0.01 to 0.64 and considering three different limit of detection (LOD) conditions (12.5%, 25% and 50% of values set below LOD) using four different adjustment methods (Richardson and Ciampi’s method, Schisterman’s method, substitution of W < LOD by zeros and substitution of W < LOD by LOD/2). The mean ICCs and Monte Carlo standard errors are shown

    MOESM14 of MALDI-TOF peptidomic analysis of serum and post-prostatic massage urine specimens to identify prostate cancer biomarkers

    No full text
    Additional file 14: MS-Tag search results.  MS-MS spectra, peptide lists and MS-Tag search results (including all the configuration parameter) for the fragmentation patters of the 12 MALDI-TOF/MS serum features

    MOESM4 of MALDI-TOF peptidomic analysis of serum and post-prostatic massage urine specimens to identify prostate cancer biomarkers

    No full text
    Additional file 4: Figure S1. The results of ICC estimation obtained by (a) varying the measurement error amount (x-axis of each graph); (b) by considering different strategies for handling limit of detection (LOD) issues; c) by considering three different LOD scenarios (12.5 %, 25% and 50% of values below LOD). The different strategies for handling LOD issues evaluated were: (1) sub W < LOD by E(W|W < LOD) = Richardson and Ciampi’s method; (2) sub W < LOD by E(W|W > LOD) = Schisterman’s method; (3) sub W < LOD by Zero and 4) sub W < LOD by LOD/2 (see Supplementary materials and methods for further details)

    MOESM1 of MALDI-TOF peptidomic analysis of serum and post-prostatic massage urine specimens to identify prostate cancer biomarkers

    No full text
    Additional file 1: Materials and methods. Urine and serum samples preparation before MALDI-TOF/MS analyses; within and between subject variability of serum MALDI-TOF/MS peptidomic features and variability of MALDI-TOF/MS serum peptidomic features; Within- and between-subjects variability of urinary MALDI-TOF/MS peptidomic analysis; Spectra processing; sLOD estimation of MALDI-TOF/MS peptidomic features; Simulation analyses to examine the reliability of ICC for datasets with measurement error and LOD issues; LOD adjustment, data normalization and log2 transformation of MALDI-TOF/MS features; RCAL and SIMEX for logistic regression analyses
    corecore