Genomewide Association Studies of LRRK2 Modifiers of Parkinson's Disease

Objective: The aim of this study was to search for genes/variants that modify the effect of LRRK2 mutations in terms of penetrance and age-at-onset of Parkinson's disease. // Methods: We performed the first genomewide association study of penetrance and age-at-onset of Parkinson's disease in LRRK2 mutation carriers (776 cases and 1,103 non-cases at their last evaluation). Cox proportional hazard models and linear mixed models were used to identify modifiers of penetrance and age-at-onset of LRRK2 mutations, respectively. We also investigated whether a polygenic risk score derived from a published genomewide association study of Parkinson's disease was able to explain variability in penetrance and age-at-onset in LRRK2 mutation carriers. // Results: A variant located in the intronic region of CORO1C on chromosome 12 (rs77395454; p value = 2.5E-08, beta = 1.27, SE = 0.23, risk allele: C) met genomewide significance for the penetrance model. Co-immunoprecipitation analyses of LRRK2 and CORO1C supported an interaction between these 2 proteins. A region on chromosome 3, within a previously reported linkage peak for Parkinson's disease susceptibility, showed suggestive associations in both models (penetrance top variant: p value = 1.1E-07; age-at-onset top variant: p value = 9.3E-07). A polygenic risk score derived from publicly available Parkinson's disease summary statistics was a significant predictor of penetrance, but not of age-at-onset. // Interpretation: This study suggests that variants within or near CORO1C may modify the penetrance of LRRK2 mutations. In addition, common Parkinson's disease associated variants collectively increase the penetrance of LRRK2 mutations

Adverse maternal, fetal, and newborn outcomes among pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Despite a growing body of research on the risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, there is continued controversy given heterogeneity in the quality and design of published studies. METHODS: We screened ongoing studies in our sequential, prospective meta-analysis. We pooled individual participant data to estimate the absolute and relative risk (RR) of adverse outcomes among pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection, compared with confirmed negative pregnancies. We evaluated the risk of bias using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: We screened 137 studies and included 12 studies in 12 countries involving 13 136 pregnant women.Pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection-as compared with uninfected pregnant women-were at significantly increased risk of maternal mortality (10 studies; n=1490; RR 7.68, 95% CI 1.70 to 34.61); admission to intensive care unit (8 studies; n=6660; RR 3.81, 95% CI 2.03 to 7.17); receiving mechanical ventilation (7 studies; n=4887; RR 15.23, 95% CI 4.32 to 53.71); receiving any critical care (7 studies; n=4735; RR 5.48, 95% CI 2.57 to 11.72); and being diagnosed with pneumonia (6 studies; n=4573; RR 23.46, 95% CI 3.03 to 181.39) and thromboembolic disease (8 studies; n=5146; RR 5.50, 95% CI 1.12 to 27.12).Neonates born to women with SARS-CoV-2 infection were more likely to be admitted to a neonatal care unit after birth (7 studies; n=7637; RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.08); be born preterm (7 studies; n=6233; RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.29) or moderately preterm (7 studies; n=6071; RR 2.92, 95% CI 1.88 to 4.54); and to be born low birth weight (12 studies; n=11 930; RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.40). Infection was not linked to stillbirth. Studies were generally at low or moderate risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis indicates that SARS-CoV-2 infection at any time during pregnancy increases the risk of maternal death, severe maternal morbidities and neonatal morbidity, but not stillbirth or intrauterine growth restriction. As more data become available, we will update these findings per the published protocol

Aspectos clínicos e terapêuticos em 135 pacientes com distonia: experiência do Setor de Distúrbios do Movimento do Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná Clinical and therapeutical features in 135 patients with dystonia: experience of movement disorders unity of the Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná

Este estudo visa descrever aspectos clínicos e respostas terapêuticas de 135 pacientes com distonia. Quanto à classificação, 54% apresentava distonia focal, 17,8% segmentar, 8,1% hemidistonia, 1,5% multifocal e 18,6% generalizada. Vinte e seis por cento apresentavam distonia secundária; e 5,9% tinham história familiar. O tratamento das distonias idiopáticas divide-se em específico e sintomático, podendo ser local, com toxina botulínica; ou sistêmico, com drogas orais. As drogas utilizadas foram anticolinérgicos e benzodiazepínicos, com resposta pobre em formas generalizadas. A toxina botulínica foi utilizada em 54 pacientes com distonia focal ou segmentar. Na distonia cervical o início do efeito (IE) ocorreu em oito dias; obtendo-se efeito máximo (EM) em 25,2 dias, e duração média do efeito (DME) de 76,8 dias. Na síndrome de Meige e blefaroespasmo obtivemos resultados encorajadores: IE=4,5dias; EM=17,6dias; DME=87,6dias. Conclui-se que a toxina botulínica A é a primeira escolha para distonias focais e segmentares, enquanto formas generalizadas apresentam resposta pobre às drogas utilizadas.<br>This study aims to describe the clinical patterns and therapeutic responses in 135 patients with dystonia. According to the classification, 54% were focal; 17.8% were segmental; 8.1% hemidistonia; 18.6% generalized and 1.5% were multifocal. There was a positive familial history in 5.9% of the cases. The treatment of the idiopathic dystonias is divided in: specific and symptomatic, and it can be local with botulinum toxin, or systemic with oral drugs. The most common drugs used in the treatment were anticholinergics and benzodiazepines, with poor responses in the generalized forms. Botulinum toxin A was the first line treatment for focal and segmental forms of dystonia. Meanwhile, the generalized forms of dystonia show poor response to the therapies utilized