Relationship between proportion of timely reactions and attention measures for CFL participants.

<p><b>(a)</b> UFOV divided attention threshold duration, <b>(b)</b> UFOV selective attention threshold duration, <b>(c)</b> UFOV divided attention difference score, <b>(d)</b> UFOV selective attention difference score, and <b>(e)</b> the MOT task. Better performance on the pedestrian detection task was associated with better performance on each of the attention tests. UFOV scores are plotted on reversed axes so that better performance is at the right hand side of the x-axis for all figures. Thick black line shows the linear trend.</p

Mean (SD) performance of normally sighted (n = 11) and CFL (n = 11) participants on each attention test and the simulator detection task.

↑<p>Higher scores indicate better performance.</p>↓<p>Lower scores indicate better performance.</p

Demographic and visual characteristics of normally-sighted (n = 11) and CFL (n = 11) study participants.

<p>^*Fisher's Exact Test for sex; Student's independent t-tests for other variables.</p

The car and truck targets from the UFOV central identification task.

<p>The targets differed only in whether two thin lines were present in the top left area of each outline, making this task difficult for participants with CFL.</p