17 research outputs found

    Exploring the Impact of Antiretroviral Drugs on the Cell-to-Cell spread of HIV-1

    Get PDF
    Recent observations on the reduced susceptibility of HIV-1 cell-to-cell infection to inhibition by Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (RTIs) have raised questions on the bearing this mode of spread may have on the successful treatment of HIV-1, the maintenance of viral reservoirs and viral pathogenesis. This thesis presents a detailed assessment of the individual drug classes, which constitute first-line and second-line antiretroviral therapy, with regard to their ability to inhibit HIV-1 cell-to-cell infection in comparison to cell-free infection. Special emphases is given to the study of Protease Inhibitors (PIs), which have a mechanism of action different from RTIs, present a higher barrier to the selection of drug-resistant viruses, are highly potent and very important in both first-line and second-line treatment of HIV-1 infection. Also, PIs have not been studied before in the context of cell-to-cell spread of HIV-1. The results obtained show that different classes of antiretroviral drugs have different potencies against cell-to-cell spread of HIV-1. While PIs are equally effective at inhibiting cell-to-cell and cell-free spread of HIV-1, RTIs especially those of the Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (NRTI) class are ineffective inhibitors of cell-to-cell spread of the virus. This thesis also assesses the impact of combination antiretroviral therapy on these two modes of viral infection, using drug synergy analysis by the median effect principle. We show that combination antiretroviral therapy is effective against both cell-to-cell and cell-free HIV-1 infection. However in the context of antiretroviral drug resistance, cell-to-cell spread may contribute to a reduced efficiency of combination antiretroviral therapy in blocking the spread of infection. Overall, the study provides a better understanding of the impact of antiretroviral therapy on cell-to-cell spread of HIV-1 and within reason, bearing in mind the limitations of in vitro models, gives some insight on the possible clinical implications of these observations for current HIV-1 therapy

    Combination Antiretroviral Therapy (cART) and Cell-cell spread of Wild-type and Drug-Resistant HIV-1

    Get PDF
    HIV-1 disseminates between T cells either by cell-free infection or by highly-efficient direct cell-cell spread. The high local multiplicity that characterizes cell-cell infection causes variability in the effectiveness of antiretroviral drugs applied as single agents. Whereas Protease Inhibitors (PIs) are effective inhibitors of HIV-1 cell-cell and cell-free infection, some Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (RTIs) show reduced potency; however antiretrovirals are not administered as single agents and are clinically used as combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Here we explored the efficacy of PI and RTI-based cART against cell-cell spread of wild-type and drug-resistant HIV-1 strains. Using a quantitative assay to measure cell-cell spread of HIV-1 between T cells, we evaluated the efficacy of different clinically relevant drug combinations. We show that combining PIs and RTIs improves the potency of inhibition of HIV-1 and effectively blocks both cell-free and cell-cell spread. Combining drugs that alone are poor inhibitors of cell-cell spread markedly improves HIV-1 inhibition, demonstrating that clinically relevant combinations of ART can inhibit this mode of HIV-1 spread. Furthermore, comparison of WT and drug-resistant viruses reveals that PI and RTI resistant viruses have a replicative advantage over wild-type virus when spreading by cell-cell means in the presence of cART, suggesting that in the context of inadequate drug combinations or drug resistance, cell-cell spread could potentially allow for ongoing viral replication

    Human monkeypox virus infection in women and non-binary individuals during the 2022 outbreaks: a global case series.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Between May and November, 2022, global outbreaks of human monkeypox virus infection have been reported in more than 78 000 people worldwide, predominantly in men who have sex with men. We describe the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of monkeypox virus infection in cisgender (cis) and transgender (trans) women and non-binary individuals assigned female sex at birth to improve identification and understanding of risk factors. METHODS: International collaborators in geographical locations with high numbers of diagnoses of monkeypox virus infection were approached and invited to contribute data on women and non-binary individuals with confirmed monkeypox virus infection. Contributing centres completed deidentified structured case-report spreadsheets, adapted and developed by participating clinicians, to include variables of interest relevant to women and non-binary individuals assigned female at birth. We describe the epidemiology and clinical course observed in the reported infections. FINDINGS: Collaborators reported data for a total of 136 individuals with monkeypox virus infection who presented between May 11 and Oct 4, 2022, across 15 countries. Overall median age was 34 years (IQR 28-40; range 19-84). The cohort comprised 62 trans women, 69 cis women, and five non-binary individuals (who were, because of small numbers, grouped with cis women to form a category of people assigned female at birth for the purpose of comparison). 121 (89%) of 136 individuals reported sex with men. 37 (27%) of all individuals were living with HIV, with a higher proportion among trans women (31 [50%] of 62) than among cis women and non-binary individuals (six [8%] of 74). Sexual transmission was suspected in 55 (89%) trans women (with the remainder having an unknown route of transmission) and 45 (61%) cis women and non-binary individuals; non-sexual routes of transmission (including household and occupational exposures) were reported only in cis women and non-binary individuals. 25 (34%) of 74 cis women and non-binary individuals submitted to the case series were initially misdiagnosed. Overall, among individuals with available data, rash was described in 124 (93%) of 134 individuals and described as anogenital in 95 (74%) of 129 and as vesiculopustular in 105 (87%) of 121. Median number of lesions was ten (IQR 5-24; range 1-200). Mucosal lesions involving the vagina, anus, or oropharynx or eye occurred in 65 (55%) of 119 individuals with available data. Vaginal and anal sex were associated with lesions at those sites. Monkeypox virus DNA was detected by PCR from vaginal swab samples in all 14 samples tested. 17 (13%) individuals were hospitalised, predominantly for bacterial superinfection of lesions and pain management. 33 (24%) individuals were treated with tecovirimat and six (4%) received post-exposure vaccinations. No deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: The clinical features of monkeypox in women and non-binary individuals were similar to those described in men, including the presence of anal and genital lesions with prominent mucosal involvement. Anatomically, anogenital lesions were reflective of sexual practices: vulvovaginal lesions predominated in cis women and non-binary individuals and anorectal features predominated in trans women. The prevalence of HIV co-infection in the cohort was high. FUNDING: None

    B Cell Depletion in HIV-1 Subtype A Infected Ugandan Adults: Relationship to CD4 T Cell Count, Viral Load and Humoral Immune Responses

    Get PDF
    To better understand the nature of B cell dysfunctions in subjects infected with HIV-1 subtype A, a rural cohort of 50 treatment-naΓ―ve Ugandan patients chronically infected with HIV-1 subtype A was studied, and the relationship between B cell depletion and HIV disease was assessed. B cell absolute counts were found to be significantly lower in HIV-1+ patients, when compared to community matched negative controls (p<0.0001). HIV-1-infected patients displayed variable functional and binding antibody titers that showed no correlation with viral load or CD4+ T cell count. However, B cell absolute counts were found to correlate inversely with neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers against subtype A (pβ€Š=β€Š0.05) and subtype CRF02_AG (pβ€Š=β€Š0.02) viruses. A positive correlation was observed between subtype A gp120 binding antibody titers and NAb breadth (pβ€Š=β€Š0.02) and mean titer against the 10 viruses (pβ€Š=β€Š0.0002). In addition, HIV-1 subtype A sera showed preferential neutralization of the 5 subtype A or CRF02_AG pseudoviruses, as compared with 5 pseudoviruses from subtypes B, C or D (p<0.001). These data demonstrate that in patients with chronic HIV-1 subtype A infection, significant B cell depletion can be observed, the degree of which does not appear to be associated with a decrease in functional antibodies. These findings also highlight the potential importance of subtype in the specificity of cross-clade neutralization in HIV-1 infection

    Monkeypox.

    Get PDF
    Monkeypox is a zoonotic illness caused by the monkeypox virus, an Orthopoxvirus in the same genus as the variola, vaccinia, and cowpox viruses. Since the detection of the first human case in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 1970, the disease has caused sporadic infections and outbreaks, mainly restricted to some countries in west and central Africa. In July, 2022, WHO declared monkeypox a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, on account of the unprecedented global spread of the disease outside previously endemic countries in Africa and the need for global solidarity to address this previously neglected disease. The 2022 outbreak has been primarily associated with close intimate contact (including sexual activity) and most cases have been diagnosed among men who have sex with men, who often present with novel epidemiological and clinical characteristics. In the 2022 outbreak, the incubation period ranges from 7 days to 10 days and most patients present with a systemic illness that includes fever and myalgia and a characteristic rash, with papules that evolve to vesicles, pustules, and crusts in the genital, anal, or oral regions and often involve the mucosa. Complications that require medical treatment (eg, antiviral therapy, antibacterials, and pain control) occur in up to 40% of patients and include rectal pain, odynophagia, penile oedema, and skin and anorectal abscesses. Most patients have a self-limited illness; between 1% and 13% require hospital admission (for treatment or isolation), and the case-fatality rate is less than 0Β·1%. A diagnosis can be made through the presence of Orthopoxvirus DNA in PCRs from lesion swabs or body fluids. Patients with severe manifestations and people at risk of severe disease (eg, immunosuppressed people) could benefit from antiviral treatment (eg, tecovirimat). The current strategy for post-exposure prophylaxis or pre-exposure prophylaxis for people at high risk is vaccination with the non-replicating modified vaccinia Ankara. Antiviral treatment and vaccines are not yet available in endemic countries in Africa
    corecore