5 research outputs found

    Tp-Te interval predicts heart rate reduction after fingolimod administration in patients with multiple sclerosis

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: FTY720 (Fingolimod) is an immunosuppressive drug, which provides favourable effects in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), albeit it induces heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) reductions. Therefore, we tested potential factors able to predict HR response in MS patients treated with fingolimod. METHODS: We analysed patients with MS followed at our Neurology Outpatient Clinic from May 2013 to June 2015. All patients underwent BP measurements and 12-lead ECG before and 6-h after drug administration. At these time intervals, conventional and new ECG indexes for cardiac damage, including Tp-Te interval, were measured. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to test the outcome of HR reduction more than median difference between baseline and final observations. RESULTS: 69 outpatients with MS (46 males, age 35.1±9.4years, BP 119.0±12.7/73.0±9.3mmHg, HR 73.5±11.4bpm) were included. No relevant adverse reactions were reported. Fingolimod induced progressive systolic (P=0.024) and diastolic (P<0.001) BP, as well as HR (P<0.001) reductions compared to baseline. Prolonged PQ (150.4±19.5 vs. 157.0±19.5ms; P<0.001), QT (374.9±27.0 vs. 400.0±25.8ms; P<0.001), Tp-Te (1.8±0.3 vs. 1.9±0.3mm; P=0.021), and reduced QTc (414.4±24.4 vs. 404.5±24.5ms; P<0.001) intervals were also recorded at final observation. Baseline HR, QT and Tp-Te intervals provided prognostic information at univariate analysis, although Tp-Te interval resulted the best independent predictor for HR reduction at multivariate analysis [0.057 (0.005-0.660); P=0.022]. CONCLUSIONS: This study firstly demonstrates that prolonged Tp-Te interval may identify those MS patients treated with fingolimod at higher risk of having significant, asymptomatic HR reduction during clinical observation

    High Failure Rate of Noninvasive Oxygenation Strategies in Critically Ill Subjects With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19

    No full text
    Background: The efficacy of noninvasive oxygenation strategies (NIOS) in treating COVID-19 disease is unknown. We conducted a prospective observational study to assess the rate of NIOS failure in subjects treated in the ICU for hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19. Methods: Patients receiving first-line treatment NIOS for hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 in the ICU of a university hospital were included in this study; laboratory data were collected upon arrival, and 28-d outcome was recorded. After propensity score matching based on Simplified Acute Physiology (SAPS) II score, age, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] at arrival, the NIOS failure rate in subjects with COVID-19 was compared to a previously published cohort who received NIOS during hypoxemic respiratory failure due to other causes. Results: A total of 85 subjects received first-line treatment with NIOS. The most frequently used methods were helmet noninvasive ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula; of these, 52 subjects (61%) required endotracheal intubation. Independent factors associated with NIOS failure were SAPS II score (P = .009) and serum lactate dehydrogenase at enrollment (P = .02); the combination of SAPS II score 65 33 with serum lactate dehydrogenase 65 405 units/L at ICU admission had 91% specificity in predicting the need for endotracheal intubation. In the propensity-matched cohorts (54 pairs), subjects with COVID-19 showed higher risk of NIOS failure than those with other causes of hypoxemic respiratory failure (59% vs 35%, P = .02), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2 (95% CI 1.1-3.6, P = .01). Conclusions: As compared to hypoxemic respiratory failure due to other etiologies, subjects with COVID-19 who were treated with NIOS in the ICU were burdened by a 2-fold higher risk of failure. Subjects with a SAPS II score 65 33 and serum lactate dehydrogenase 65 405 units/L represent the population with the greatest risk

    Asthma in patients admitted to emergency department for COVID-19: prevalence and risk of hospitalization

    No full text
    Non

    Assessment of neurological manifestations in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19

    No full text
    corecore