24 research outputs found
A Well-Defined (POCOP)Rh Catalyst for the Coupling of Aryl Halides with Thiols
This article describes a well-defined
pincer-Rh catalyst for C–S
cross-coupling reactions. (POCOP)ÂRhÂ(H)Â(Cl) serves as an active precatalyst
for the coupling of aryl chlorides and bromides with aryl and alkyl
thiols under reasonable conditions (3% mol cat., 110 °C, 2–24
h, >90% yield). For select substrates, >90% yields were obtained
with
catalyst loading as low as 0.1%. Key mechanistic intermediates have
been isolated and fully characterized, including (POCOP)ÂRhÂ(Ph)Â(SPh)
(<b>6a</b>) and (POCOP)ÂRhÂ(SPh<sub>2</sub>) (<b>6b</b>).
The aryl/bisÂ(phosphinite) (POCOP)Rh system has been shown to favor
aryl thiolate reductive elimination at elevated temperatures and in
some cases at room temperature, compared with the analogous diarylamido/bisÂ(phosphine)
(PNP)Rh pincer system. Concerted reductive elimination has been studied
with <b>6a</b> directly and in the presence of aryl bromide
and aryl chloride traps. This investigation demonstrates a clear rate
dependence on aryl chloride concentration during catalysis, a dependence
that is absent when using aryl bromides. The rate of catalysis is
dramatically reduced or brought to zero for <i>ortho</i>-tolyl halides, which can be traced to slower C–S coupling
and slower carbon–halogen oxidative addition for <i>ortho</i>-substituted aryls. The influence of the sterics in the thiol component
is less straightforward. The S–H oxidative addition product
(POCOP)ÂRhÂ(H)Â(SPh) (<b>16</b>) has been fully characterized and
its reactivity has been examined, resulting in the isolation of the
sodium-thiolate adduct (POCOP)ÂRhÂ(NaSPh) (<b>19</b>). The solid-state
structure of <b>19</b> shows Na interactions not only with sulfur,
but also with a neighboring Rh and the chelating aryl carbon of the
pincer framework. The reactivity of <b>16</b> and <b>19</b> indicates that these potential side products should not hinder catalysis
Fate of Aryl/Amido Complexes of Rhodium(III) Supported by a POCOP Pincer Ligand: C–N Reductive Elimination, β‑Hydrogen Elimination, and Relevance to Catalysis
Rhodium
complexes supported by the aryl/bisÂ(phosphinite) POCOP
pincer ligand undergo reactions that constitute a Rh<sup>I</sup>/Rh<sup>III</sup> synthetic cycle for C–N coupling analogous to the
classical Pd<sup>0</sup>/Pd<sup>II</sup> Buchwald–Hartwig chemistry.
(POCOP)ÂRhÂ(Ar)Â(X) complexes (X = Cl, Br) can be readily obtained by
oxidative addition of ArX to the (POCOP)Rh fragment generated in situ
from (POCOP)ÂRhÂ(H)Â(Cl) (<b>1</b>) and NaO<sup>t</sup>Bu. (POCOP)ÂRhÂ(Ar)Â(X)
complexes react with anilines and diphenylamine in the presence of
an equimolar amount of NaO<sup>t</sup>Bu to give Rh<sup>III</sup> aryl/amido
complexes (POCOP)ÂRhÂ(Ar)Â(NHAr′) and (POCOP)ÂRhÂ(Ar)Â(NPh<sub>2</sub>). The intermediate (POCOP)ÂRhÂ(<i>p</i>-F<sub>3</sub>CC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)Â(O<sup>t</sup>Bu) (<b>7</b>) was isolated
and shown to react irreversibly with <i>p</i>-MeC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>NH<sub>2</sub> to give (POCOP)ÂRhÂ(<i>p</i>-F<sub>3</sub>CC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)Â(NHC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>Me-<i>p</i>) (<b>5</b>). The latter undergoes reductive elimination
of the diarylamine product <i>p</i>-F<sub>3</sub>CC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>NHC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>Me-<i>p</i> upon heating. The kinetics of this reaction point to a first-order
process, and DFT calculations located a transition state for concerted
C–N reductive elimination. Complex <b>1</b> effected
catalytic formation of diarylamines from anilines and aryl chlorides
and bromides at 115 °C in the presence of NaO<sup>t</sup>Bu with
modest turnover numbers of <15. In a separate reaction, <b>5</b> was degraded by NaO<sup>t</sup>Bu under catalytic conditions; it
is possible that it is one of the reasons for limited catalytic turnover.
Reactions of <b>7</b> with pyrrolidine and <i>N</i>-methylaniline resulted in the formation of C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>5</sub>CF<sub>3</sub>, HO<sup>t</sup>Bu, and imine complexes of (POCOP)ÂRh.
This ostensibly proceeds via β-hydrogen elimination from the
unobserved aryl/amido intermediate, followed by loss of C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>5</sub>CF<sub>3</sub> by C–H reductive elimination.
DFT calculations were consistent with this pathway and indicated that
it possesses a significantly lower barrier than the concerted C–N
reductive elimination