7 research outputs found
Chiral Resolution and Serendipitous Fluorination Reaction for the Selective Dopamine D3 Receptor Antagonist BAK2-66
The improved chiral synthesis of
the selective dopamine D3 receptor
(D3R) antagonist (<i>R</i>)-<i>N</i>-(4-(4-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)Âpiperazin-1-yl)-3-hydroxybutyl)Â1<i>H</i>-indole-2-carboxamide (<b>(</b><i><b>R</b></i><b>)-PG648</b>) is described. The same chiral secondary
alcohol intermediate was used to prepare the enantiomers of a 3-F-benzofuranyl
analogue, <b>BAK 2-66</b>. The absolute configurations of the
3-F enantiomers were assigned from their X-ray crystal structures
that confirmed retention of configuration during fluorination with <i>N</i>,<i>N</i>-diethylaminosulfur trifluoride (DAST). <b>(</b><i><b>R</b></i><b>)-BAK2-66</b> showed
higher D3R affinity and selectivity than its (<i>S</i>)-enantiomer;
however, it had lower D3R affinity and enantioselectivity than <b>(</b><i><b>R</b></i><b>)-PG648</b>. Further,
importance of the 4-atom linker length between the aryl amide and
4-phenylpiperazine was demonstrated with the 4-fluorobutyl-product
(<b>8</b>)
Highly Selective Dopamine D<sub>3</sub> Receptor (D<sub>3</sub>R) Antagonists and Partial Agonists Based on Eticlopride and the D<sub>3</sub>R Crystal Structure: New Leads for Opioid Dependence Treatment
The recent and precipitous
increase in opioid analgesic abuse and
overdose has inspired investigation of the dopamine D<sub>3</sub> receptor
(D<sub>3</sub>R) as a target for therapeutic intervention. Metabolic
instability or predicted toxicity has precluded successful translation
of previously reported D<sub>3</sub>R-selective antagonists to clinical
use for cocaine abuse. Herein, we report a series of novel and D<sub>3</sub>R crystal structure-guided 4-phenylpiperazines with exceptionally
high D<sub>3</sub>R affinities and/or selectivities with varying efficacies.
Lead compound <b>19</b> was selected based on its in vitro profile:
D<sub>3</sub>R <i>K</i><sub>i</sub> = 6.84 nM, 1700-fold
D<sub>3</sub>R versus D<sub>2</sub>R binding selectivity, and its
metabolic stability in mouse microsomes. Compound <b>19</b> inhibited
oxycodone-induced hyperlocomotion in mice and reduced oxycodone-induced
locomotor sensitization. In addition, pretreatment with <b>19</b> also dose-dependently inhibited the acquisition of oxycodone-induced
conditioned place preference (CPP) in rats. These findings support
the D<sub>3</sub>R as a target for opioid dependence treatment and
compound <b>19</b> as a new lead molecule for development
Synthesis and Pharmacological Characterization of Novel <i>trans</i>-Cyclopropylmethyl-Linked Bivalent Ligands That Exhibit Selectivity and Allosteric Pharmacology at the Dopamine D<sub>3</sub> Receptor (D<sub>3</sub>R)
The development of bitopic ligands
directed toward D<sub>2</sub>-like receptors has proven to be of particular
interest to improve
the selectivity and/or affinity of these ligands and as an approach
to modulate and bias their efficacies. The structural similarities
between dopamine D<sub>3</sub> receptor (D<sub>3</sub>R)-selective
molecules that display bitopic or allosteric pharmacology and those
that are simply competitive antagonists are subtle and intriguing.
Herein we synthesized a series of molecules in which the primary and
secondary pharmacophores were derived from the D<sub>3</sub>R-selective
antagonists SB269,652 (<b>1</b>) and SB277011A (<b>2</b>) whose structural similarity and pharmacological disparity provided
the perfect templates for SAR investigation. Incorporating a <i>trans</i>-cyclopropylmethyl linker between pharmacophores and
manipulating linker length resulted in the identification of two bivalent
noncompetitive D<sub>3</sub>R-selective antagonists, <b>18a</b> and <b>25a</b>, which further delineates SAR associated with
allosterism at D<sub>3</sub>R and provides leads toward novel drug
development
Synthesis and Pharmacological Characterization of Novel <i>trans</i>-Cyclopropylmethyl-Linked Bivalent Ligands That Exhibit Selectivity and Allosteric Pharmacology at the Dopamine D<sub>3</sub> Receptor (D<sub>3</sub>R)
The development of bitopic ligands
directed toward D<sub>2</sub>-like receptors has proven to be of particular
interest to improve
the selectivity and/or affinity of these ligands and as an approach
to modulate and bias their efficacies. The structural similarities
between dopamine D<sub>3</sub> receptor (D<sub>3</sub>R)-selective
molecules that display bitopic or allosteric pharmacology and those
that are simply competitive antagonists are subtle and intriguing.
Herein we synthesized a series of molecules in which the primary and
secondary pharmacophores were derived from the D<sub>3</sub>R-selective
antagonists SB269,652 (<b>1</b>) and SB277011A (<b>2</b>) whose structural similarity and pharmacological disparity provided
the perfect templates for SAR investigation. Incorporating a <i>trans</i>-cyclopropylmethyl linker between pharmacophores and
manipulating linker length resulted in the identification of two bivalent
noncompetitive D<sub>3</sub>R-selective antagonists, <b>18a</b> and <b>25a</b>, which further delineates SAR associated with
allosterism at D<sub>3</sub>R and provides leads toward novel drug
development
Toward Understanding the Structural Basis of Partial Agonism at the Dopamine D<sub>3</sub> Receptor
Both
dopamine D<sub>3</sub> receptor (D<sub>3</sub>R) partial agonists
and antagonists have been implicated as potential medications for
substance use disorders. In contrast to antagonists, partial agonists
may cause fewer side effects since they maintain some dopaminergic
tone and may be less disruptive to normal neuronal functions. Here,
we report three sets of 4-phenylpiperazine stereoisomers that differ
considerably in efficacy: the (<i>R</i>)-enantiomers are
antagonists/weak partial agonists, whereas the (<i>S</i>)-enantiomers are much more efficacious. To investigate the structural
basis of partial agonism, we performed comparative microsecond-scale
molecular dynamics simulations starting from the inactive state of
D<sub>3</sub>R in complex with these enantiomers. Analysis of the
simulation results reveals common structural rearrangements near the
ligand binding site induced by the bound (<i>S</i>)-enantiomers,
but not by the (<i>R</i>)-enantiomers, that are features
of partially activated receptor conformations. These receptor models
bound with partial agonists may be useful for structure-based design
of compounds with tailored efficacy profiles
Toward Understanding the Structural Basis of Partial Agonism at the Dopamine D<sub>3</sub> Receptor
Both
dopamine D<sub>3</sub> receptor (D<sub>3</sub>R) partial agonists
and antagonists have been implicated as potential medications for
substance use disorders. In contrast to antagonists, partial agonists
may cause fewer side effects since they maintain some dopaminergic
tone and may be less disruptive to normal neuronal functions. Here,
we report three sets of 4-phenylpiperazine stereoisomers that differ
considerably in efficacy: the (<i>R</i>)-enantiomers are
antagonists/weak partial agonists, whereas the (<i>S</i>)-enantiomers are much more efficacious. To investigate the structural
basis of partial agonism, we performed comparative microsecond-scale
molecular dynamics simulations starting from the inactive state of
D<sub>3</sub>R in complex with these enantiomers. Analysis of the
simulation results reveals common structural rearrangements near the
ligand binding site induced by the bound (<i>S</i>)-enantiomers,
but not by the (<i>R</i>)-enantiomers, that are features
of partially activated receptor conformations. These receptor models
bound with partial agonists may be useful for structure-based design
of compounds with tailored efficacy profiles
Novel Analogues of (<i>R</i>)‑5-(Methylamino)-5,6-dihydro‑4<i>H</i>‑imidazo[4,5,1-<i>ij</i>]quinolin-2(1<i>H</i>)‑one (Sumanirole) Provide Clues to Dopamine D<sub>2</sub>/D<sub>3</sub> Receptor Agonist Selectivity
Novel
1-, 5-, and 8-substituted analogues of sumanirole (<b>1</b>),
a dopamine D<sub>2</sub>/D<sub>3</sub> receptor (D<sub>2</sub>R/D<sub>3</sub>R) agonist, were synthesized. Binding affinities
at both D<sub>2</sub>R and D<sub>3</sub>R were higher when determined
in competition with the agonist radioligand [<sup>3</sup>H]Â7-hydroxy-<i>N</i>,<i>N</i>-dipropyl-2-aminotetralin (7-OH-DPAT)
than with the antagonist radioligand [<sup>3</sup>H]<i>N</i>-methylspiperone. Although <b>1</b> was confirmed as a D<sub>2</sub>R-preferential agonist, its selectivity in binding and functional
studies was lower than previously reported. All analogues were determined
to be D<sub>2</sub>R/D<sub>3</sub>R agonists in both G<sub>o</sub>BRET and mitogenesis functional assays. Loss of efficacy was detected
for the <i>N</i>-1-substituted analogues at D<sub>3</sub>R. In contrast, the <i>N</i>-5-alkyl-substituted analogues,
and notably the <i>n</i>-butyl-arylamides (<b>22b</b> and <b>22c</b>), all showed improved affinity at D<sub>2</sub>R over <b>1</b> with neither a loss of efficacy nor an increase
in selectivity. Computational modeling provided a structural basis
for the D<sub>2</sub>R selectivity of <b>1</b>, illustrating
how subtle differences in the highly homologous orthosteric binding
site (OBS) differentially affect D<sub>2</sub>R/D<sub>3</sub>R affinity
and functional efficacy