Sensitivity analysis across a range of pre-treatment microbial counts of reference pathogens and adherence, at “high” and “low” effectiveness (6 log₁₀ and 2 log₁₀, respectively) and at 2 levels of water consumption (1 litre per person per day and 5 litres per person per day).

<p>Reported means are from single-hit models.</p

Overview of assumptions used in calculating DALYs averted, adapted from Table 7.6, <i>Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality</i>, 4^th Edition [24].

<p>Overview of assumptions used in calculating DALYs averted, adapted from Table 7.6, <i>Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality</i>, 4^th Edition <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0036735#pone.0036735-Luby2" target="_blank">[24]</a>.</p

Probabilistic model output with estimated mean DALYs averted per 100,000 persons pear year as a function of pre-treatment water quality; treatment effectiveness against bacteria, viruses, and protozoa; and adherence.

<p>Probabilistic model output with estimated mean DALYs averted per 100,000 persons pear year as a function of pre-treatment water quality; treatment effectiveness against bacteria, viruses, and protozoa; and adherence.</p

Characteristics of respondents (n = 475).

<p>Characteristics of respondents (n = 475).</p

Women’s involvement in decision making of their own personal lives and household items (n = 475).

<p>Women’s involvement in decision making of their own personal lives and household items (n = 475).</p

Association between socio-economic status and women’s decision making to build latrine^*.

<p>Association between socio-economic status and women’s decision making to build latrine^{<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0178042#t005fn001" target="_blank">*</a>}.</p

Women’s involvement in decision making around stages of latrine building(N = 258).

<p>Women’s involvement in decision making around stages of latrine building(N = 258).</p

Characteristics of participants in focus groups and individual interviews.

<p>Characteristics of participants in focus groups and individual interviews.</p

Household water quality among Pureit adopters and non-adopters.

<p>Household water quality among Pureit adopters and non-adopters.</p

Consistency of HWT-use among households that self-reported performing HWT at baseline in the urban and rural communities.

<p>Consistency of HWT-use among households that self-reported performing HWT at baseline in the urban and rural communities.</p