4 research outputs found

    Multisite Comparison of MRI Defacing Software Across Multiple Cohorts

    Get PDF
    With improvements to both scan quality and facial recognition software, there is an increased risk of participants being identified by a 3D render of their structural neuroimaging scans, even when all other personal information has been removed. To prevent this, facial features should be removed before data are shared or openly released, but while there are several publicly available software algorithms to do this, there has been no comprehensive review of their accuracy within the general population. To address this, we tested multiple algorithms on 300 scans from three neuroscience research projects, funded in part by the Ontario Brain Institute, to cover a wide range of ages (3–85 years) and multiple patient cohorts. While skull stripping is more thorough at removing identifiable features, we focused mainly on defacing software, as skull stripping also removes potentially useful information, which may be required for future analyses. We tested six publicly available algorithms (afni_refacer, deepdefacer, mri_deface, mridefacer, pydeface, quickshear), with one skull stripper (FreeSurfer) included for comparison. Accuracy was measured through a pass/fail system with two criteria; one, that all facial features had been removed and two, that no brain tissue was removed in the process. A subset of defaced scans were also run through several preprocessing pipelines to ensure that none of the algorithms would alter the resulting outputs. We found that the success rates varied strongly between defacers, with afni_refacer (89%) and pydeface (83%) having the highest rates, overall. In both cases, the primary source of failure came from a single dataset that the defacer appeared to struggle with - the youngest cohort (3–20 years) for afni_refacer and the oldest (44–85 years) for pydeface, demonstrating that defacer performance not only depends on the data provided, but that this effect varies between algorithms. While there were some very minor differences between the preprocessing results for defaced and original scans, none of these were significant and were within the range of variation between using different NIfTI converters, or using raw DICOM files

    Measuring Cerebrovascular Pulsatility Using Cardiac Cycle Fluctuations of fMRI BOLD Data

    No full text
    Arterial pulsatility is linked to cerebral small vessel damage and neurodegeneration, but measuring cerebrovascular pulsatility in humans has largely been impeded by the skull. This thesis describes a method that generates cerebrovascular pulsatility maps based on resorting blood-oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) volumes according to their cardiac cycle position. Sensitivity of this method was tested using 20 minutes of moderate-intensity exercise as an acute physiological stressor in 45 healthy adolescents. Further examinations evaluated the influence of repetition time (TR) and echo time (TE) via simulation and multi-echo data, respectively. There were global, tissue-specific, and region-specific decreases in cerebrovascular pulsatility 20 minutes following exercise cessation. Cardiac-related pulsatility detection was comparable over a range of TR and TE values, with highest detection during rapid TRs (â ¤300ms) or shorter TE (~14ms). These results suggest that cardiac-related fMRI may represent a potent and easily adoptable method of mapping cerebrovascular pulsatility influences with voxel-wise specificity.M.Sc
    corecore