23 research outputs found

    AmĂ©lioration de la surveillance de l’influenza aviaire de type H5N1 - Cartographie du risque d’influenza aviaire de type H5N1 en Afrique: Rapport final et cartes de risquĂ© d’influenza aviaire

    Get PDF
    Plus de 85% des mĂ©nages ruraux en Afrique Ă©lĂšvent la volaille aux fins d’alimentation, de revenu ou les deux, et de nombreuses personnes vivent en contact Ă©troit avec leurs oiseaux. La possibilitĂ© d’une Ă©pidĂ©mie de l’influenza aviaire hautement pathogĂšne (IAHP) de type H5N1 est donc une grande prĂ©occupation. Depuis 2006, la grippe aviaire est apparue dans au moins 11 pays africains et plus de 600 foyers d’épidĂ©mie ont Ă©tĂ© signalĂ©s. La vigilance est essentielle en vue de limiter la maladie mais le personnel de santĂ© animale ne peut faire un suivi partout Ă  la fois. Ce projet de cartographie de facteurs de risques a Ă©tĂ© conçu en vue d’aider Ă  prioriser leurs efforts en indiquant les lieux oĂč il existe un risque trĂšs Ă©levĂ© de flambĂ©es de la maladie. La cartographie des risques est une image complexe gĂ©nĂ©rĂ©e par ordinateur qui montre la rĂ©partition spatiale des facteurs de risques prĂ©vus d’une maladie. Elle est fondĂ©e sur la rĂ©partition spatiale des « facteurs de risques » associĂ©s au risque accru de maladie et Ă  l’importance relative de chacun de ces facteurs. Dans le cas d’une grippe aviaire de type H5N1, les facteurs de risques sont les principales voies de transport, les marchĂ©s de volailles et les points d’eau avec possibilitĂ© de contact entre les oiseaux domestiques et sauvages. Pour ce projet, les chercheurs ont prĂ©parĂ© des cartes de risques de grippe aviaire en Afrique en utilisant la modĂ©lisation de dĂ©cision multicritĂšres (MCDM). De cette façon, ils ont intĂ©grĂ© les donnĂ©es et les informations de diverses sources telles que les publications scientifi ques, les cartes disponibles dans le domaine public, les Ă©tudes de terrain et les consultations d’expert

    Risk mapping for HPAI H5N1 in Africa - Improving surveillance for virulent bird flu: Final report and maps

    Get PDF
    More than 85 percent of households in rural Africa raise poultry for food, income, or both, and many people live in close contact with their birds. The possibility of an epidemic of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 is therefore a major concern. Since 2006 bird fl u has been introduced into at least 11 countries in Africa, and over 600 outbreaks reported. Vigilance is key to limiting the disease but animal health personnel cannot monitor everywhere at once. This risk-mapping project was designed to help prioritize their efforts by showing in which places outbreaks are more likely to occur. A risk map is a complex, computer-generated image that shows the spatial distribution of the predicted risk of a disease. It is based on the spatial distribution of “risk factors” associated with an increased risk of disease, and the relative importance of each of these factors. In the case of virulent bird fl u, risk factors include major transport routes, markets where poultry may be traded, and wetlands with the possibility of contact between poultry and wild birds. Researchers in this project have prepared risk maps for bird fl u in Africa using multi-criteria decision modeling (MCDM). In this way they have integrated data and information from such diverse sources as published scientific literature, maps available in the public domain, field surveys and expert consultations

    Risk of suicidality in mental and neurological disorders in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    No full text
    Background: Both fatal and nonfatal suicidal behaviours are important complications of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders (MNSDs) worldwide. We aimed at quantifying the association of suicidal behaviour with MNSDs in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs) where varying environmental and socio-cultural factors may impact outcome. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to report the associations between MNSDs and suicidality in LMICs and the study-level factors of these associations. We searched the following electronic databases: PUBMED, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, World Cat, and Cochrane library for studies on suicide risk in MNSDs, with a comparison/control group of persons without MNSDs, published from January 1, 1995 to September 3, 2020. Median estimates were calculated for relative risks for suicide behaviour and MNSDs, and when appropriate, these were pooled using random effects metanalytic model. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020178772. Results: The search identified 73 eligible studies: 28 were used for quantitative synthesis of estimates and 45 for description of risk factors. Studies included came from low and upper middle-income countries with a majority of these from Asia and South America and none from a low-income country. The sample size was 13,759 for MNSD cases and 11,792 hospital or community controls without MNSD. The most common MNSD exposure for suicidal behaviour was depressive disorders (47 studies (64%)), followed by schizophrenia spectrum, and other psychotic disorders (28 studies (38%)). Pooled estimates from the meta-analysis were statistically significant for suicidal behaviour with any MNSDs (odds ratios (OR) = 1∙98 (95%CI = 1∙80–2∙16))) and depressive disorder (OR = 3∙26 (95%CI = 2∙88–3∙63))), with both remaining significant after inclusion of high-quality studies only. Meta-regression identified only hospital-based studies (ratio of OR = 2∙85, CI:1∙24–6∙55) and sample size (OR = 1∙00, CI:0∙99–1∙00) as possible sources of variability in estimates. Risk for suicidal behaviour in MNSDs was increased by demographic factors (e.g., male sex, and unemployment), family history, psychosocial context and physical illness. Interpretation: There is an association between suicidal behaviour and MNSDs in LMICs, the association is greater for depressive disorder in LMICs than what has been reported in High Income Countries (HICs). There is urgent need to improve access for MNSDs care in LMICs. Funding: None
    corecore