The "Rail Technique" for Correction of Cervicothoracic Kyphosis: Case Report and Surgical Technique Description.

Cervicothoracic deformity correction often necessitates a shortening operation, consisting of a 3-column osteotomy (3CO). While effective, segmental compression and in situ and cantilever bending often place screws under considerable stress and may jeopardize deformity correction. In this report, we present the surgical technique of a novel method, the "rail technique," to shorten across a vertebral column resection (VCR) for cervicothoracic deformity correction. A 65-year-old woman with a history of a C5-pelvis posterior instrumented fusion (PSIF) presented with chin-on-chest deformity after a prior proximal junctional failure/kyphosis at T4 (30° T3-5) above a prior T5-pelvis PSIF that was stabilized in situ. She underwent an uncomplicated revision C2-T10 PSIF with shortening across a T4 VCR using the "rail technique." Postoperatively, radiographs demonstrated excellent restoration of and normalization of cervical sagittal alignment, thoracic kyphosis, focal T3-5 kyphosis (7°), and global sagittal alignment. At 1-year postoperation, she was without neck pain and reported significant improvements in self-image, mental health, satisfaction, and subscale Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores compared to preoperative values. The "rail technique" is a safe and effective method for shortening over a 3CO to correct the cervicothoracic deformity

The "Rail Technique" for Correction of Cervicothoracic Kyphosis: Case Report and Surgical Technique Description.

Cervicothoracic deformity correction often necessitates a shortening operation, consisting of a 3-column osteotomy (3CO). While effective, segmental compression and in situ and cantilever bending often place screws under considerable stress and may jeopardize deformity correction. In this report, we present the surgical technique of a novel method, the "rail technique," to shorten across a vertebral column resection (VCR) for cervicothoracic deformity correction. A 65-year-old woman with a history of a C5-pelvis posterior instrumented fusion (PSIF) presented with chin-on-chest deformity after a prior proximal junctional failure/kyphosis at T4 (30° T3-5) above a prior T5-pelvis PSIF that was stabilized in situ. She underwent an uncomplicated revision C2-T10 PSIF with shortening across a T4 VCR using the "rail technique." Postoperatively, radiographs demonstrated excellent restoration of and normalization of cervical sagittal alignment, thoracic kyphosis, focal T3-5 kyphosis (7°), and global sagittal alignment. At 1-year postoperation, she was without neck pain and reported significant improvements in self-image, mental health, satisfaction, and subscale Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores compared to preoperative values. The "rail technique" is a safe and effective method for shortening over a 3CO to correct the cervicothoracic deformity

Does number of rods matter? 4-, 5-, and 6-rods across a lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite element analysis

PurposeTo assess biomechanics of a lumbar PSO stabilized with different multi-rod constructs (4-, 5-, 6-rods) using satellite and accessory rods.MethodsA validated spinopelvic finite element model with a L3 PSO was used to evaluate the following constructs: 2 primary rods T10-pelvis ("Control"), two satellite rods (4-rod), two satellite rods + one accessory rod (5-rod), or two satellite rods + two accessory rods (6-rod). Data recorded included: ROM T10-S1 and L2-L4, von Mises stresses on primary, satellite, and accessory rods, factor of safety yield stress, and force across the PSO surfaces. Percent differences relative to Control were calculated.ResultsCompared to Control, 4-rods increased PSO flexion and extension. Lower PSO ROMs were observed for 5- and 6-rods compared to 4-rods. However, 4-rod (348.6 N) and 5-rod (343.2 N) showed higher PSO forces than 2-rods (336 N) and 6-rods had lower PSO forces (324.2 N). 5- and 6-rods led to the lowest rod von Mises stresses across the PSO. 6-rod had the maximum factor of safety on the primary rods.ConclusionsIn this finite element analysis, 4-rods reduced stresses on primary rods across a lumbar PSO. Although increased rigidity afforded by 5- and 6-rods decreased rod stresses, it resulted in less load transfer to the anterior vertebral column (particularly for 6-rod), which may not be favorable for the healing of the anterior column. A balance between the construct's rigidity and anterior load sharing is essential

Rates and risk factors associated with 30- and 90-day readmissions and reoperations after spinal fusions for adult lumbar degenerative pathology and spinal deformity

PURPOSE: Analyze state databases to determine variables associated with of short-term readmissions and reoperations following thoracolumbar spine fusions for degenerative pathology and spinal deformity. METHODS: Retrospective study of State Inpatient Database (2005-13, CA, NE, NY, FL, NC, UT). INCLUSION CRITERIA: age \u3e 45 years, diagnosis of degenerative spinal deformity, ≥ 3 level posterolateral lumbar spine fusion. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: revision surgery, cervical fusions, trauma, and cancer. Univariate and step-wise multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent variables associated with of 30- and 90-day readmissions and reoperations. RESULTS: 12,641 patients were included. All-cause 30- and 90-day readmission rates were 14.6% and 21.1%, respectively. 90-day readmissions were associated with: age \u3e 80 (OR: 1.42), 8 + level fusions (OR: 1.19), hospital length of stay (LOS) \u3e 7 days (OR: 1.43), obesity (OR: 1.29), morbid obesity (OR: 1.66), academic hospital (OR: 1.13), cancer history (OR:1.21), drug abuse (OR: 1.31), increased Charlson Comorbidity index (OR: 1.12), and depression (OR: 1.20). Private insurance (OR: 0.64) and lumbar-only fusions (OR: 0.87) were not associated with 90-day readmissions. All-cause 30- and 90-day reoperation rates were 1.8% and 4.2%, respectively. Variables associated with 90-day reoperations were 8 + level fusions (OR: 1.28), LOS \u3e 7 days (OR: 1.43), drug abuse (OR: 1.68), osteoporosis (OR: 1.26), and depression (OR: 1.23). Circumferential fusion (OR: 0.58) and lumbar-only fusions (OR: 0.68) were not associated with 90-day reoperations. CONCLUSIONS: 30- and 90-day readmission and reoperation rates in thoracolumbar fusions for adult degenerative pathology and spinal deformity may have been underreported in previously published smaller studies. Identification of modifiable risk factors is important for improving quality of care through preoperative optimization

Influence of Preoperative T1-Slope and Cervical Sagittal Vertical Axis on Postoperative Cervical Sagittal Alignment Following Posterior Cervical Laminoplasty.

BackgroundAssess correlation between preoperative cervical sagittal alignment (T1 slope [T1S] and C2-C7 cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA]) and postoperative cervical sagittal balance after posterior cervical laminoplasty.MethodsConsecutive patients who underwent laminoplasty at a single institution with >6 weeks postoperative follow-up were divided into 4 groups based on preoperative cSVA and T1S (Group 1: cSVA <4 cm/T1S <20°; Group 2: cSVA ≥4 cm/T1S ≥20°; Group 3: cSVA <4 cm/T1S ≥20°; Group 4: cSVA <4 cm/T1S <20°). Radiographic analyses were conducted at 3 timepoints, and changes in cSVA, C2-C7 cervical lordosis (CL), and T1S -CL were compared.ResultsA total of 214 patients met inclusion criteria (28 patients had cSVA <4 cm/T1S <20° [Group 1]; 47 patients had cSVA ≥4 cm/T1S ≥20° [Group 2]; 139 patients had cSVA <4 cm/T1S ≥20° [Group 3]). No patients had cSVA ≥4 cm/T1S <20° (Group 4). Patients either had a C4-C6 (60.7%) or C3-C6 (39.3%) laminoplasty. Mean follow-up was 1.6 ± 1.32 years. For all patients, mean cSVA increased 6 mm postoperatively. cSVA significantly increased postoperatively for both groups with a preoperative cSVA <4 cm (ie, Groups 1 and 3 [P < 0.01]). For all patients, mean CL decreased 2° postoperatively. Groups 1 and 2 had significant differences in preoperative CL but nonsignificant differences at 6 weeks (P = 0.41) and last follow-up (P = 0.06).ConclusionCervical laminoplasty resulted in a mean decrease in CL. Patients with high preoperative T1S, irrespective of cSVA, were at risk of loss of CL postoperatively. While patients with low preoperative T1S and cSVA <4 cm experienced a decrease in global sagittal cervical alignment, CL was not jeopardized.Clinical relevanceThe results of this study may facilitate preoperative planning for patients undergoing posterior cervical laminoplasty.Level of evidence:

Risk factors for extended length of stay and non-home discharge in adults treated with multi-level fusion for lumbar degenerative pathology and deformity

PurposeTo identify independent risk factors, including the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) score, associated with extended length of stay (eLOS) and non-home discharge following elective multi-level instrumented spine fusion operations for diagnosis of adult spinal deformity (ASD) and lumbar degenerative pathology.MethodsAdults who underwent multi-level ([Formula: see text] segments) instrumented spine fusions for ASD and lumbar degenerative pathology at a single institution (2016-2021) were reviewed. Presence of a pre-operative RAPT score was used as an inclusion criterion. Excluded were patients who underwent non-elective operations, revisions, operations for trauma, malignancy, and/or infections. Outcomes were eLOS (> 7 days) and discharge location (home vs. non-home). Predictor variables included demographics, comorbidities, operative information, Surgical Invasiveness Index (SII), and RAPT score. Fisher's exact test was used for univariate analysis, and significant variables were implemented in multivariate binary logistic regression, with generation of 95% percent confidence intervals (CI), odds ratios (OR), and p-values.ResultsIncluded for analysis were 355 patients. Post-operatively, 36.6% (n = 130) had eLOS and 53.2% (n = 189) had a non-home discharge. Risk factors significant for a non-home discharge were older age (> 70 years), SII > 36, pre-op RAPT < 10, DMII, diagnosis of depression or anxiety, and eLOS. Risk factors significant for an eLOS were SII > 20, RAPT < 6, and an ASA score of 3.ConclusionThe RAPT score and SII were most important significant predictors of eLOS and non-home discharges following multi-level instrumented fusions for lumbar spinal pathology and deformity. Preoperative optimization of the RAPT's individual components may provide a useful strategy for decreasing LOS and modifying discharge disposition

Proximal Junctional Spondylodiscitis Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Case Series and Review of the Literature.

BackgroundProximal junctional failure (PJF) following multilevel thoracolumbar instrumented to the pelvis for adult spinal deformity (ASD) is relatively uncommon but considerably disabling. While the leading etiology is mechanical, other rarer etiologies can play a role in its development. The purpose of this study was to present a case series of ASD patients who experienced PJF secondary to proximal junctional spondylodiscitis (PJS) after long-segment thoracolumbar posterior instrumented fusions.MethodsAdult patients who underwent posterior instrumented fusions at a single academic center between 2017 and 2020 and subsequently developed PJS were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, operative details, clinical presentation, culture data, and management approach were evaluated.ResultsThree patients developed PJS and were included for analysis (mean age 67 years [range, 58-76]; women: 2). Indication for all index operations was symptomatic ASD after failed conservative management. Clinical presentation ranged from mild back pain to severe neurological compromise. Average time to infection and PJF after the index procedure was 11 months (range, 3 months-2 years). All 3 patients were successfully managed with urgent revision surgery including surgical debridement and postoperative antibiotics.ConclusionPJS is a rare yet potentially devastating complication following long-segment posterior thoracolumbar instrumented fusions for ASD. It is critical that surgeons maintain a high index of suspicion of infection when managing PJF given the potential neurological morbidity of PJS.Clinical relevanceThis report highlights a rare but important cause of PJF following ASD surgery. It is critical that one maintains a high index of suspicion of infection when managing PJF.Level of evidence:

Reoperation and Mortality Rates Following Elective 1 to 2 Level Lumbar Fusion: A Large State Database Analysis.

Study designRetrospective cohort.ObjectiveReoperation to lumbar spinal fusion creates significant burden on patient quality of life and healthcare costs. We assessed rates, etiologies, and risk factors for reoperation following elective 1 to 2 level lumbar fusion.MethodsPatients undergoing elective 1 to 2 level lumbar fusion were identified using the Health Care Utilization Project (HCUP) state inpatient databases from Florida and California. Patients were tracked for 5 years for any subsequent lumbar fusion. Cox proportional hazard analyses for reoperation were assessed using the following covariates: fusion approach type, age, race, Charlson comormidity index, gender, and length of stay. Distribution of etiologies for reoperation was then assessed.Results71, 456 patients receiving elective 1 to 2 level lumbar fusion were included. A 5-year reoperation rate of 13.53% and mortality rate of 2.22% was seen. Combined anterior-posterior approaches (HR = 0.904, p < 0.05) and TLIF (HR = 0.867, p < 0.001) were associated with reduced risk of reoperation compared to stand-alone anterior approaches and non-TLIF posterior approaches. Age, gender, and number of comorbidities were not associated with risk of reoperation. From 1 to 5 years, degenerative disease rose from 43.50% to 50.31% of reoperations; mechanical failure decreased from 37.65% to 29.77%.ConclusionsTLIF and combined anterior-posterior approaches for 1 to 2 level lumbar fusion are associated with the lowest rate of reoperation. Number of comorbidities and age are not predictive of reoperation. Primary etiologies leading to reoperation were degenerative disease and mechanical failure. Mortality rate is not increased from baseline following 1 to 2 level lumbar fusion

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for correction of lumbosacral fractional curves in adult (thoraco)lumbar scoliosis: A systematic review

ABSTRACT: Background: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) may be used to correct the lumbosacral fractional curve (LsFC) in de novo adult (thoraco) lumbar scoliosis. Yet, the relative benefits of ALIF and TLIF for LsFC correction remain largely undetermined. Purpose: To compare the currently available data comparing radiographic correction of the LsFC provided by ALIF and TLIF of LsFC in adult (thoraco)lumbar scoliosis. Methods: A systematic review was performed on original articles discussing fractional curve correction of lumbosacral spinal deformity (using search criteria: “lumbar” and “fractional curve”). Articles which discussed TLIF or ALIF for LsFC correction were presented and radiographic results for TLIF and ALIF were compared. Results: Thirty-one articles were returned in the original search criteria, with 7 articles included in the systematic review criteria. All 7 articles presented radiographic results using TLIF for LsFC correction. Three of these articles also discussed results for patients whose LsFC were treated with ALIFs; 2 articles directly compared TLIF and ALIF for LsFC correction. Level III and level IV evidence indicated ALIF as advantageous for reducing the coronal Cobb angle of the LsFC. There were mixed results on relative efficacy of ALIF and TLIF in the LsFC for restoration of adequate global coronal alignment. Conclusions: Limited level III and IV evidence suggests ALIF as advantageous for reducing the coronal Cobb angle of the LsFC in de novo adult (thoraco) lumbar scoliosis. Relative efficacy of ALIF and TLIF in the LsFC for restoration of global coronal alignment may be dictated by several factors, including directionality and magnitude of preoperative coronal deformity. Given the limited and low-quality evidence, additional research is warranted to determine the ideal interbody support strategies to address the LsFC in adult (thoraco) lumbar scoliosis