How long can we preserve the pulmonary graft inside the nonheart-beating donor?

Background. The use of lungs from nonheart-beating donors (NHBD) might significantly alleviate the organ shortage. Extending the preharvest interval in NHBD would facilitate distant organ retrieval. We hypothesized that prolonged topical cooling inside NHBD after 60 minutes of initial warm ischemia would not affect the pulmonary graft. Methods. Domestic pigs were anesthetized and divided into three groups (n = 6 in each group). In the control group (HBD), lungs were flushed, explanted, and further stored in low potassium dextran solution (4 degreesC) for 4 hours. In the two study groups pigs were sacrificed by myocardial fibrillation and left untouched for 1 hour. Chest drains were then inserted for topical lung cooling (6 degreesC) for 3 hours (NHBD-TC3) or 6 hours (NHBD-TC6). The left lung in all groups was then prepared for evaluation. In an isolated circuit lungs were ventilated and reperfused through the pulmonary artery. Hemodynamic, aerodynamic, and oxygenation variables were measured 35 minutes after onset of controlled reperfusion. Wet-to-dry weight ratio was calculated. Results. No significant differences were observed among the three groups in pulmonary vascular resistance (p = 0.38), mean airway pressure (p = 0.39), oxygenation index (p = 0.62), and wet-to-dry weight ratio (p = 0.09). Conclusions. These data confirm that 1 hour of warm ischemia does not affect the pulmonary graft from NHBD compared with HBD. The preharvest interval can be safely extended up to 7 hours postmortem by additional topical cooling of the graft inside the cadaver. This technique may facilitate distant organ retrieval in NHBD. (C) 2004 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Is Conventional Bypass for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery a Misnomer?

Although recent trials comparing on vs. off-pump revascularization techniques describe cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) as conventional, inadequate description and evaluation of how CPB is managed often exist in the peer-reviewed literature. We identify and subsequently describe regional and center-level differences in the techniques and equipment used for conducting CPB in the setting of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. We accessed prospectively collected data among isolated CABG procedures submitted to either the Australian and New Zealand Collaborative Perfusion Registry (ANZCPR) or Perfusion Measures and outcomes (PERForm) Registry between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015. Variation in equipment and management practices reflecting key areas of CPB is described across 47 centers (ANZCPR: 9; PERForm: 38). We report average usage (categorical data) or median values (continuous data) at the center-level, along with the minimum and maximum across centers. Three thousand five hundred sixty-two patients were identified in the ANZCPR and 8,450 in PERForm. Substantial variation in equipment usage and CPB management practices existed (within and across registries). Open venous reservoirs were commonly used across both registries (nearly 100%), as were all-but-cannula biopassive surface coatings (\u3e90%), whereas roller pumps were more commonly used in ANZCPR (ANZCPR: 85% vs. PERForm: 64%). ANZCPR participants had 640 mL absolute higher net prime volumes, attributed in part to higher total prime volume (1,462 mL vs. 1,217 mL) and lower adoption of retrograde autologous priming (20% vs. 81%). ANZCPR participants had higher nadir hematocrit on CPB (27 vs. 25). Minimal absolute differences existed in exposure to high arterial outflow temperatures (36.6 degrees C vs. 37.0 degrees C). We report substantial center and registry differences in both the type of equipment used and CPB management strategies. These findings suggest that the term conventional bypass may not adequately reflect real-world experiences. Instead of using this term, authors should provide key details of the CPB practices used in their patients

Esophageal Replacement - Gastric Tube Or Whole Stomach

Background. The stomach can be used either in its entirety or as a greater curvature tube for esophageal replacement. Methods. The study compares the gastric tube (group A; n = 112) to the whole stomach whose lesser curvature is denuded (group B; n = 100) in terms of technical complication and alimentary comfort. The clinical results are substantiated by assessment of the eating performance of patients and control subjects at a test meal, measurement of the gastric dimensions before and after both tailoring procedures, and intraarterial staining of the gastric wall. Results. Major differences between the two groups are cervical anastomosis stenoses (22.3% versus 6% [A versus B]; p = 0.008), fistulas (7.9% versus 1%; p = 0.0209), number of meals and snacks per day (4.6 versus 4; p = 0.0275), sensation of early fullness at meals (52.4% versus 17.8%; p < 0.0001), ratings given to the long-term alimentary comfort (presymptomatic condition = 10 points) (7.6 versus 8.8 out of 10 on average; p < 0.0001), and calories consumed in 1 minute at a test meal (59% [p < 0.05] versus 77% of those consumed by control subjects). The volume of the stomach is reduced by a range of 21.4% to 47.2% after tubulization (group A) whereas it increases by a range of 4.9% to 17.4% after denudation of the lesser curve (group B). Intraarterial staining of the gastric wall reveals the poor vascularity of the upper-most segment of the greater curve. Conclusion. Slight increase of the gastric capacity and maintenance of the submucosal vascular network account for the better results achieved with the whole stomach