Studies on risk factors for urinary incontinence in Swedish female twins

Approximately half of all women in industrialized countries will experience urinary incontinence during their lifetime. Even though urinary incontinence is not a life threatening disease, it often has severe implications for daily function, social interactions, sexuality and psychological well-being. Moreover, urinary incontinence has a major impact on health economy and is increasingly recognized as a global health burden. Hence, identifying risk factors for urinary incontinence is of importance for individual women at risk, as well as for society’s health care costs. In the first study, the association between coffee and tea intake and urinary incontinence was evaluated. Women with a high coffee intake were at lower risk of overall incontinence, while no effect was observed between coffee intake and other urinary incontinence subtypes. A higher risk of nocturia and overactive bladder was found among women with a high tea intake. However, results from co-twin control analysis showed that these associations were likely confounded by familial factors. In the second study, the effect of gestational diabetes mellitus on overactive bladder was investigated. Women with gestational diabetes mellitus had an almost two times higher odds of overactive bladder compared to women without gestational diabetes. The effect of gestational diabetes mellitus on overactive bladder was not mediated by body mass index or diabetes later in life. In the third study, the association between depressive mood disorders (depressive symptoms and major depression) and neuroticism with urinary incontinence was investigated. In logistic regression analysis depressive mood disorders and neuroticism were positively associated with urinary incontinence. Results from quantitative genetic analysis showed that the association between depressive mood disorders, neuroticism and urinary incontinence was partly determined by genetic factors in common to the disorders. In the fourth study, the effect of birth weight and being born small for gestational age on urinary incontinence later in life was evaluated. Results showed that birth weight and being born small for gestational age had no effect on urinary incontinence. However, women who had a low birth weight and then became overweight had a borderline statistically significant higher odds of overall and stress incontinence compared to overweight women who had a normal birth weight. This finding suggests that low birth weight in combination with elevated adult body mass index may contribute to the risk of urinary incontinence later in life

Number of siblings and survival from childhood leukaemia : a national register-based cohort study from Sweden

Background: Previous studies suggest worse leukaemia survival for children with siblings, but the evidence is sparse, inconsistent and does not consider clinical factors. We explored the associations between number of siblings in the household, birth order, and survival from childhood acute lymphoid leukaemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Methods: In this nationwide register-based study we included all children aged 1-14, diagnosed with ALL and AML between 1991-mid 2015 in Sweden (n=1692). Using Cox regression models, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) according to number of siblings and birth order, adjusting for known prognostic and sociodemographic factors. Results: A tendency towards better ALL survival among children with one, or ≥2, siblings was observed, adjHRs (95% CI): 0.73 (0.49-1.10) and 0.63 (0.40-1.00), respectively. However, this was mainly limited to children with low risk profiles. An indication of better AML survival among children with siblings was seen, adjHRs (95% CI) 0.68 (0.36-1.29) and 0.71 (0.34-1.48) but diminished after adjusting for birth order. Conclusion: Our results do not support previous findings that a larger number of siblings is associated with poorer survival. Inconsistencies might be explained by underlying mechanisms that differ between settings, but chance cannot be ruled out.The Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (contract no. 2013-1072)Accepte

Survival After Childhood Cancer–Social Inequalities in High-Income Countries

Despite substantial improvements in survival from childhood cancer during the last decades, there are indications that survival rates for several cancer types are no longer improving. Moreover, evidence accumulates suggesting that socioeconomic and sociodemographic factors may have an impact on survival also in high-income countries. The aim of this review is to summarize the findings from studies on social factors and survival in childhood cancer. Several types of cancer and social factors are included in order to shed light on potential mechanisms and identify particularly affected groups. A literature search conducted in PubMed identified 333 articles published from December 2012 until June 2018, of which 24 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The findings are diverse; some studies found no associations but several indicated a social gradient with higher mortality among children from families of lower socioeconomic status (SES). There were no clear suggestions of particularly vulnerable subgroups, but hematological malignancies were most commonly investigated. A wide range of social factors have been examined and seem to be of different importance and varying between studies. However, potential underlying mechanisms linking a specific social factor to childhood cancer survival was seldom described. This review provides some support for a relationship between lower parental SES and worse survival after childhood cancer, which is a finding that needs further attention. Studies investigating predefined hypotheses involving specific social factors within homogenous cancer types are lacking and would increase the understanding of mechanisms involved, and allow targeted interventions to reduce health inequalities

A multinational case-control study on childhood brain tumours, anthropogenic factors, birth characteristics and prenatal exposures: A validation of interview data.

Little is known about the aetiology of childhood brain tumours. We investigated anthropometric factors (birth weight, length, maternal age), birth characteristics (e.g. vacuum extraction, preterm delivery, birth order) and exposures during pregnancy (e.g. maternal: smoking, working, dietary supplement intake) in relation to risk of brain tumour diagnosis among 7-19 year olds. The multinational case-control study in Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Switzerland (CEFALO) included interviews with 352 (participation rate=83.2%) eligible cases and 646 (71.1%) population-based controls. Interview data were complemented with data from birth registries and validated by assessing agreement (Cohen's Kappa). We used conditional logistic regression models matched on age, sex and geographical region (adjusted for maternal age and parental education) to explore associations between birth factors and childhood brain tumour risk. Agreement between interview and birth registry data ranged from moderate (Kappa=0.54; worked during pregnancy) to almost perfect (Kappa=0.98; birth weight). Neither anthropogenic factors nor birth characteristics were associated with childhood brain tumour risk. Maternal vitamin intake during pregnancy was indicative of a protective effect (OR 0.75, 95%-CI: 0.56-1.01). No association was seen for maternal smoking during pregnancy or working during pregnancy. We found little evidence that the considered birth factors were related to brain tumour risk among children and adolescents

Headache, tinnitus and hearing loss in the international Cohort Study of Mobile Phone Use and Health (COSMOS) in Sweden and Finland

Background Mobile phone use and exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) from it have been associated with symptoms in some studies, but the studies have shortcomings and their findings are inconsistent. We conducted a prospective cohort study to assess the association between amount of mobile phone use at baseline and frequency of headache, tinnitus or hearing loss at 4-year follow-up. Methods The participants had mobile phone subscriptions with major mobile phone network operators in Sweden (n = 21 049) and Finland (n = 3120), gave consent for obtaining their mobile phone call data from operator records at baseline, and filled in both baseline and follow-up questionnaires on symptoms, potential confounders and further characteristics of their mobile phone use. Results The participants with the highest decile of recorded call-time (average call-time >276 min per week) at baseline showed a weak, suggestive increased frequency of weekly headaches at 4-year follow-up (adjusted odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.95–1.34). There was no obvious gradient of weekly headache with increasing call-time (P trend 0.06). The association of headache with call-time was stronger for the Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) network than older Global System for Mobile Telecommunications (GSM) technology, despite the latter involving higher exposure to RF-EMF. Tinnitus and hearing loss showed no association with call-time. Conclusions People using mobile phones most extensively for making or receiving calls at baseline reported weekly headaches slightly more frequently at follow-up than other users, but this finding largely disappeared after adjustment for confounders and was not related to call-time in GSM with higher RF-EMF exposure. Tinnitus and hearing loss were not associated with amount of call-time

Mobile phone use and brain tumour risk - COSMOS, a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Each new generation of mobile phone technology has triggered discussions about potential carcinogenicity from exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF). Available evidence has been insufficient to conclude about long-term and heavy mobile phone use, limited by differential recall and selection bias, or crude exposure assessment. The Cohort Study on Mobile Phones and Health (COSMOS) was specifically designed to overcome these shortcomings. METHODS: We recruited participants in Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK 2007-2012. The baseline questionnaire assessed lifetime history of mobile phone use. Participants were followed through population-based cancer registers to identify glioma, meningioma, and acoustic neuroma cases during follow-up. Non-differential exposure misclassification was reduced by adjusting estimates of mobile phone call-time through regression calibration methods based on self-reported data and objective operator-recorded information at baseline. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for glioma, meningioma, and acoustic neuroma in relation to lifetime history of mobile phone use were estimated with Cox regression models with attained age as the underlying time-scale, adjusted for country, sex, educational level, and marital status. RESULTS: 264,574 participants accrued 1,836,479 person-years. During a median follow-up of 7.12 years, 149 glioma, 89 meningioma, and 29 incident cases of acoustic neuroma were diagnosed. The adjusted HR per 100 regression-calibrated cumulative hours of mobile phone call-time was 1.00 (95 % CI 0.98-1.02) for glioma, 1.01 (95 % CI 0.96-1.06) for meningioma, and 1.02 (95 % CI 0.99-1.06) for acoustic neuroma. For glioma, the HR for ≥ 1908 regression-calibrated cumulative hours (90th percentile cut-point) was 1.07 (95 % CI 0.62-1.86). Over 15 years of mobile phone use was not associated with an increased tumour risk; for glioma the HR was 0.97 (95 % CI 0.62-1.52). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the cumulative amount of mobile phone use is not associated with the risk of developing glioma, meningioma, or acoustic neuroma