14 research outputs found

    Magnetic viscosity and paleomagnetism of the basement complex at DSDP Hole 77-538A

    No full text
    The basement at Catoche Knoll consists of Paleozoic gneiss and amphibolite intruded by several generations of early Jurassic diabase dikes. Upon exposure to a 1-oersted field for 9 days, the diabase and amphibolite acquire a viscous remanent magnetization (VRM) which ranges from 42 to 2047% of their natural remanent magnetization (NRM). A magnetic field of similar intensity is observed in the paleomagnetic facility of the Glomar Challenger, and it is therefore doubtful if accurate measurements of magnetic moments in such rocks can be made on board unless the facility is magnetically shielded. The significant VRM also indicates the futility of attempting to discern magnetic lineations from an ocean floor composed of such rocks. No strong correlation exists between the Königsberger ratio, which is usually less than 1, and the tendency to acquire a VRM. The VRM decay is typical of a Richter aftereffect, but the relaxation times vary widely among the samples studied. A stable remanence is observed after alternating field demagnetization to 200 Oe. The range of magnetic inclinations in the diabase dikes is consistent with 40Ar/39Ar dates of 190 and 160 Ma. The inclinations suggest that the Catoche Knoll block tilted more than 20° to the north after the final dike intrusion

    Susceptibility and time-dependent magnetization of basalts at DSDP Hole 76-534A

    No full text
    Basalts from Hole 534A are among the oldest recovered from the ocean bottom, dating from the opening of the Atlantic 155 Ma. Upon exposure to a 1-Oe field for one week, these basalts acquire a viscous remanent magnetization (VRM), which ranges from 4 to 223% of their natural remanent magnetization (NRM). A magnetic field of similar magnitude is observed in the paleomagnetic lab of the Glomar Challenger, and it is therefore doubtful if accurate measurements of magnetic moment in such rocks can be made on board unless the paleomagnetic area is magnetically shielded. No correlation is observed between the Konigsberger ratio (beta), which is usually less than 3, and the ability to acquire a VRM. The VRM shows both a log t dependence and a Richter aftereffect. Both of these, but especially the log t dependence, will cause the susceptibility measurements (made by applying a magnetic field for a very short time) to be minimum values. The susceptibility and derived Q should therefore be used cautiously for magnetic anomaly interpretation, because they can cause the importance of the induced magnetization to be underestimated

    (Table 1) Components of magnetization at DSDP Hole 77-538A

    No full text
    At DSDP Sites 536 and 538 in the southeastern Gulf of Mexico, rocks from near the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary were recovered. The Danian/Maestrichtian samples from Site 536 were stepwise demagnetized in alternating fields up to 400 Oe. Two distinct components of magnetization could be identified, neither of which displays a reversal pattern compatible with the age of the samples. Samples from the Danian section at Site 538 were subjected to a combination of alternating field and thermal demagnetization. Although several reversals are observed, a unique correlation with the magnetic time scale is not possible until the paleontology of the section is better defined

    Inclination of the two main components of magnetization and 87Sr/86Sr ratios for dolomites at DSDP Hole 77-536

    No full text
    Site 536 terminated in a shallow-water dolomite of unknown age. Paleomagnetic measurements combined with strontium isotope analyses suggest that the dolomite was deposited in the Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous time interval. However, the assumptions required to reach this determination make these results less than conclusive
    corecore