7 research outputs found

    Prediction model for the diurnal behavior of the tropospheric scintillation variance

    Get PDF
    Tropospheric scintillation is caused by variations of the refractive index due to turbulence. The only meteorological input parameter for two common current scintillation models by Karasawa et al. (1988) and by the ITU-R is the monthly average of the wet part of the refractivity Nwet at ground level, which is not directly associated with turbulence. The diurnal correlation between Nwet and scintillation variance is very weak. Because clouds and cloud formation are closely associated with the turbulence, quantitative cloud parameters were looked for. Cloud type information based on edited synoptic cloud reports are available from the common database of CDIAC and NCAR. Both diurnal and seasonal variations between scintillation variance and average amount of Cumulus type clouds are well correlated. Using this cloud information together with Nwet, a new method for tropospheric scintillation variance predicting also the diurnal variations is introduced. This model is derived and tested using scintillation measurements at four sites in different climates in Finland, United Kingdom, Japan, and Texa

    Prediction model for the diurnal behavior of the tropospheric scintillation variance

    No full text
    Tropospheric scintillation is caused by variations of the refractive index due to turbulence. The only meteorological input parameter for two common current scintillation models by Karasawa et al. (1988) and by the ITU-R is the monthly average of the wet part of the refractivity Nwet at ground level, which is not directly associated with turbulence. The diurnal correlation between Nwet and scintillation variance is very weak. Because clouds and cloud formation are closely associated with the turbulence, quantitative cloud parameters were looked for. Cloud type information based on edited synoptic cloud reports are available from the common database of CDIAC and NCAR. Both diurnal and seasonal variations between scintillation variance and average amount of Cumulus type clouds are well correlated. Using this cloud information together with Nwet, a new method for tropospheric scintillation variance predicting also the diurnal variations is introduced. This model is derived and tested using scintillation measurements at four sites in different climates in Finland, United Kingdom, Japan, and Texa

    Improved models for long-term prediction of tropospheric scintillation on slant paths

    No full text
    The prediction models for tropospheric scintillation on earth-satellite paths from Karasawa, Yamada, and Allnutt and ITU-R are compared with measurement results from satellite links in Europe, the United States, and Japan at frequencies from 7 to 30 GHz and elevation angles of 3 to 33°. The existing prediction models relate the long-term average scintillation intensity to the wet term of refractivity at ground level. The comparison shows that the seasonal variation of scintillation intensity is well predicted by this relation, but for the annual average some additional meteorological information is needed. A much better agreement with measurement results is found when a parameter representing the average water content of heavy clouds is incorporated. This confirms the assumption that scintillation is, at least partly, associated with turbulence inside clouds. The asymmetry between the distributions of signal fade and enhancement can also be explained by turbulence inside clouds. The asymmetry depends on the intensity of the scintillation, which is consistent with the theory assuming a thin layer of cloudy turbulence. A new model based on this theory predicts the distributions of signal fade and enhancement significantly better. © 1999 IEEE

    Polarisation independence of amplitude scintillation

    No full text

    Above genetics: Lessons from cerebral development in autism

    No full text
    corecore