Automated Cardiac Resting Phase Detection Targeted on the Right Coronary Artery

Static cardiac imaging such as late gadolinium enhancement, mapping, or 3-D coronary angiography require prior information, e.g., the phase during a cardiac cycle with least motion, called resting phase (RP). The purpose of this work is to propose a fully automated framework that allows the detection of the right coronary artery (RCA) RP within CINE series. The proposed prototype system consists of three main steps. First, the localization of the regions of interest (ROI) is performed. Second, the cropped ROI series are taken for tracking motions over all time points. Third, the output motion values are used to classify RPs. In this work, we focused on the detection of the area with the outer edge of the cross-section of the RCA as our target. The proposed framework was evaluated on 102 clinically acquired dataset at 1.5T and 3T. The automatically classified RPs were compared with the reference RPs annotated manually by a expert for testing the robustness and feasibility of the framework. The predicted RCA RPs showed high agreement with the experts annotated RPs with 92.7% accuracy, 90.5% sensitivity and 95.0% specificity for the unseen study dataset. The mean absolute difference of the start and end RP was 13.6 $\pm$ 18.6 ms for the validation study dataset (n=102). In this work, automated RP detection has been introduced by the proposed framework and demonstrated feasibility, robustness, and applicability for static imaging acquisitions.Comment: Accepted for publication at the Journal of Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging (MELBA) https://melba-journal.org/2023:00

Deep learning-based left ventricular segmentation demonstrates improved performance on respiratory motion-resolved whole-heart reconstructions

IntroductionDeep learning (DL)-based segmentation has gained popularity for routine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) image analysis and in particular, delineation of left ventricular (LV) borders for LV volume determination. Free-breathing, self-navigated, whole-heart CMR exams provide high-resolution, isotropic coverage of the heart for assessment of cardiac anatomy including LV volume. The combination of whole-heart free-breathing CMR and DL-based LV segmentation has the potential to streamline the acquisition and analysis of clinical CMR exams. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of a DL-based automatic LV segmentation network trained primarily on computed tomography (CT) images in two whole-heart CMR reconstruction methods: (1) an in-line respiratory motion-corrected (Mcorr) reconstruction and (2) an off-line, compressed sensing-based, multi-volume respiratory motion-resolved (Mres) reconstruction. Given that Mres images were shown to have greater image quality in previous studies than Mcorr images, we hypothesized that the LV volumes segmented from Mres images are closer to the manual expert-traced left ventricular endocardial border than the Mcorr images.MethodThis retrospective study used 15 patients who underwent clinically indicated 1.5 T CMR exams with a prototype ECG-gated 3D radial phyllotaxis balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) sequence. For each reconstruction method, the absolute volume difference (AVD) of the automatically and manually segmented LV volumes was used as the primary quantity to investigate whether 3D DL-based LV segmentation generalized better on Mcorr or Mres 3D whole-heart images. Additionally, we assessed the 3D Dice similarity coefficient between the manual and automatic LV masks of each reconstructed 3D whole-heart image and the sharpness of the LV myocardium-blood pool interface. A two-tail paired Student’s t-test (alpha = 0.05) was used to test the significance in this study.Results & DiscussionThe AVD in the respiratory Mres reconstruction was lower than the AVD in the respiratory Mcorr reconstruction: 7.73 ± 6.54 ml vs. 20.0 ± 22.4 ml, respectively (n = 15, p-value = 0.03). The 3D Dice coefficient between the DL-segmented masks and the manually segmented masks was higher for Mres images than for Mcorr images: 0.90 ± 0.02 vs. 0.87 ± 0.03 respectively, with a p-value = 0.02. Sharpness on Mres images was higher than on Mcorr images: 0.15 ± 0.05 vs. 0.12 ± 0.04, respectively, with a p-value of 0.014 (n = 15).ConclusionWe conclude that the DL-based 3D automatic LV segmentation network trained on CT images and fine-tuned on MR images generalized better on Mres images than on Mcorr images for quantifying LV volumes