Delayed detection of atrial fibrillation after ischemic stroke

<b>Background</b>: Detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) after ischemic stroke is important because anticoagulation is indicated to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke. However, no consensus exists about the optimum method for detecting underlying paroxysmal AF not apparent on presentation with stroke. The aim of this study was to characterize the rate, timing, and predictors of delayed detection of AF after stroke. <b>Methods</b>: The Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive provided data from 3464 patients in the placebo arms of 4 clinical trials of therapies for acute ischemic stroke. Patients who had AF by history or on the baseline electrocardiogram were excluded. Electrocardiograms were obtained routinely and as clinically indicated. The time to detection of AF was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival statistics. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to evaluate risk factors for AF. <b>Results</b>: Among 2504 qualifying patients, AF was detected in 174 (6.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.0%-8.0%). In 68% of patients, AF was detected more than 48 hours after presentation. Detection of AF was associated with increasing age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.6/decade; 95% CI 1.4-1.9; P < .005), female sex (HR 1.7; CI 1.2-2.4; P < .005), congestive heart failure (HR 1.9; CI 1.1-3.4; P = .02), and the absence of hypertension (HR 1.6; CI 1.1-2.2; P = .01). <b>Conclusions</b>: Delayed detection of AF was common in this large cohort of patients carefully monitored after ischemic stroke. Current methods of screening may fail to detect underlying paroxysmal AF in a substantial proportion of patients

Effects of beam and pulse trawling on the benthic ecosystem

In dit rapport worden de effecten van visserij met sleepnetten op de zeebodem en bodemdieren bestudeerd. Een BACI - ontwerp experiment werd gebruikt om de effecten van een traditionele boomkor en een pulskor te onderzoeken. In de afgelopen jaren is als gevolg van lagere brandstofkosten en goede tong vangsten het gebruik van de pulskor techniek onder Nederlandse vissers toegenomen

A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee

Many clinical trials have evaluated the benefit of long-term use of antiplatelet drugs in reducing the risk of clinical thrombotic events. Aspirin and ticlopidine have been shown to be effective, but both have potentially serious adverse effects. Clopidogrel, a new thienopyridine derivative similar to ticlopidine, is an inhibitor of platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate. METHODS: CAPRIE was a randomised, blinded, international trial designed to assess the relative efficacy of clopidogrel (75 mg once daily) and aspirin (325 mg once daily) in reducing the risk of a composite outcome cluster of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death; their relative safety was also assessed. The population studied comprised subgroups of patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease manifested as either recent ischaemic stroke, recent myocardial infarction, or symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Patients were followed for 1 to 3 years. FINDINGS: 19,185 patients, with more than 6300 in each of the clinical subgroups, were recruited over 3 years, with a mean follow-up of 1.91 years. There were 1960 first events included in the outcome cluster on which an intention-to-treat analysis showed that patients treated with clopidogrel had an annual 5.32% risk of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death compared with 5.83% with aspirin. These rates reflect a statistically significant (p = 0.043) relative-risk reduction of 8.7% in favour of clopidogrel (95% Cl 0.3-16.5). Corresponding on-treatment analysis yielded a relative-risk reduction of 9.4%. There were no major differences in terms of safety. Reported adverse experiences in the clopidogrel and aspirin groups judged to be severe included rash (0.26% vs 0.10%), diarrhoea (0.23% vs 0.11%), upper gastrointestinal discomfort (0.97% vs 1.22%), intracranial haemorrhage (0.33% vs 0.47%), and gastrointestinal haemorrhage (0.52% vs 0.72%), respectively. There were ten (0.10%) patients in the clopidogrel group with significant reductions in neutrophils (< 1.2 x 10(9)/L) and 16 (0.17%) in the aspirin group. INTERPRETATION: Long-term administration of clopidogrel to patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease is more effective than aspirin in reducing the combined risk of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death. The overall safety profile of clopidogrel is at least as good as that of medium-dose aspirin