11 research outputs found

    The association of serum calprotectin (S100A8/S100A9) levels with disease relapses in PR3-ANCA-associated vasculitis

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVES: S100A8/A9 (calprotectin) has shown promise as a biomarker for predicting relapse in AAV. This study investigated serum S100A8/A9 levels as a biomarker predicting future relapse in a large cohort of patients with severe ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). METHODS: Serum levels of S100A8/A9 were measured at baseline, months 2, and 6 following treatment initiation in 144 patients in the RAVE trial (cyclophosphamide/azathioprine vs. rituximab for induction of remission) who attained complete remission. RESULTS: Patients were divided into 4 groups: PR3-ANCA with (n=37), and without (n=56) relapse, and MPO-ANCA with (n=6) and without (n=45) relapse. Serum S100A8/A9 levels decreased in all groups during the first 6 months of treatment. The percentage reduction from baseline to month 2 was significantly different between relapsers and non-relapsers in the PR3-AAV group (p=0.046). A significantly higher risk of relapse was associated with an increase in S100A8/A9 between baseline and month 2 (p=0.006) and baseline and month 6 (p=0.0099) for all patients. Subgroup analysis demonstrated it was patients treated with rituximab and who increased levels of S100A8/A9 who were at greatest risk of future relapse (p=0.028). CONCLUSION: An increase in serum S100A8/A9 by month 2 or 6 compared to baseline identifies a subgroup of PR3-ANCA patients treated with rituximab at higher risk of relapse by 18 months. As rituximab is increasingly used for remission induction in relapsing PR3-ANCA patients, S100A8/A9 may assist in identifying those patients requiring more intensive or prolonged treatment

    Effect of 2 years of treatment with sublingual grass pollen immunotherapy on nasal response to allergen challenge at three years among patients with moderate to severe seasonal allergic rhinitis: The GRASS randomized clinical trial

    No full text
    Importance Sublingual immunotherapy and subcutaneous immunotherapy are effective in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Three years of continuous treatment with subcutaneous immunotherapy and sublingual immunotherapy has been shown to improve symptoms for at least 2 years following discontinuation of treatment. Objective To assess whether 2 years of treatment with grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy, compared with placebo, provides improved nasal response to allergen challenge at 3-year follow-up. Design, Setting, and Participants A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3–parallel-group study performed in a single academic center, Imperial College London, of adult patients with moderate to severe seasonal allergic rhinitis (interfering with usual daily activities or sleep). First enrollment was March 2011, last follow-up was February 2015. Interventions Thirty-six participants received 2 years of sublingual immunotherapy (daily tablets containing 15 µg of major allergen Phleum p 5 and monthly placebo injections), 36 received subcutaneous immunotherapy (monthly injections containing 20 µg of Phleum p 5 and daily placebo tablets) and 34 received matched double-placebo. Nasal allergen challenge was performed before treatment, at 1 and 2 years of treatment, and at 3 years (1 year after treatment discontinuation). Main Outcomes and Measures Total nasal symptom scores (TNSS; range; 0 [best] to 12 [worst]) were recorded between 0 and 10 hours after challenge. The minimum clinically important difference for change in TNSS within an individual is 1.08. The primary outcome was TNSS comparing sublingual immunotherapy vs placebo at year 3. Subcutaneous immunotherapy was included as a positive control. The study was not powered to compare sublingual immunotherapy with subcutaneous immunotherapy. Results Among 106 randomized participants (mean age, 33.5 years; 34 women [32.1%]), 92 completed the study at 3 years. In the intent-to-treat population, mean TNSS score for the sublingual immunotherapy group was 6.36 (95% CI, 5.76 to 6.96) at pretreatment and 4.73 (95% CI, 3.97 to 5.48) at 3 years, and for the placebo group, the score was 6.06 (95% CI, 5.23 to 6.88) at pretreatment and 4.81 (95% CI, 3.97 to 5.65) at 3 years. The between-group difference (adjusted for baseline) was −0.18 (95% CI, −1.25 to 0.90; [P = .75]). Conclusions and Relevance Among patients with moderate to severe seasonal allergic rhinitis, 2 years of sublingual grass pollen immunotherapy was not significantly different from placebo in improving the nasal response to allergen challenge at 3-year follow-up. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01335139; EudraCT Number: 2010-023536-1

    Current Status of Allograft Tolerance in Intestinal Transplantation

    Get PDF
    Solid organ transplantation has become a clinical practice after the development of different immunosuppressive drugs that allowed controlling rejection. The price to be paid for that is the permanent risk of infections and malignancies and a significant drug-associated toxicity. The establishment of transplant tolerance has been the “holy grail” for transplantation medicine since its beginnings. Different experimental approaches and clinical trials resulted in the accumulation of knowledge on mechanisms and strategies that favor the establishment of tolerance without achieving the objective of autonomous allograft tolerance in the clinical field. Development of tolerance in intestinal transplantation constitutes a challenging situation due to several particular features that contribute to the generation of a strong allogeneic response. In the present review, we summarize the different immune mechanisms that may contribute to allograft tolerance. The different barriers that should be bypassed in intestinal transplantation to tolerate the graft are discussed. Finally, we revise the strategies that were applied with different degrees of success in the clinical field including the most promising recent approaches and the forthcoming candidates in the field that might be translated into clinical trials in the near future.Fil: Meier, Dominik. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación Favaloro; ArgentinaFil: Rumbo, Martín. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas. Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas. Laboratorio de Investigaciones del Sistema Inmune; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Gondolesi, Gabriel Eduardo. Fundación Favaloro; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentin
    corecore