3 research outputs found
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), also called slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE), is the most common hip pathology in pre-adolescent and adolescents. However, this diagnosis is often delayed or missed due to either atypical presentation, such as thigh or knee pain, or the chronic nature of the presentation. The differential diagnosis for pre-adolescent and adolescents presenting with leg pain is broad; thus, the medical provider must always consider the diagnosis of SCFE. Delay in the diagnosis of SCFE is associated with higher rates of complications, including femoral head osteonecrosis
Recommended from our members
Virtual Interviews and the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Match Geography: A National Survey
Introduction: Virtual interviews (VI) are now a permanent part of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) recruitment, especially given the cost and equity advantages. Yet inability to visit programs in person can impact decision-making, leading applicants to apply to more programs. Moreover, the cost advantages of VI may encourage applicants to apply to programs farther away than they might otherwise have been willing or able to travel. This could create unnecessary strain on programs. We conducted this study to determine whether PEM fellowship applicants would apply to a larger number of programs and in different geographic patterns with VI (2020 and 2021) as compared to in-person interviews (2018 and 2019).Methods: We conducted an anonymous national survey of all PEM fellows comparing two cohorts: current fellows who interviewed in-person (applied in 2018/2019) and fellows who underwent VIs in 2020/ 2021 (current fellows and those recently matched in 2021). The study took place in MarchāApril 2022. Questions focused on geographic considerations during interviews and the match. We used descriptive statistics, chi-square and t-tests for analysis.Results: Overall response rate was 42% (231/550); 32% (n = 74) interviewed in person and 68% (n = 157) virtually. Fellows applied to a median of 4/6 geographic regions (interquartile range 2, 5). Most applied for fellowship both in the same region as residency (216, 93%) and outside (192, 83%). Only the Paciļ¬c region saw a statistically signiļ¬cant increase in applicants during VI (59.9% vs 43.2%, P = 0.02). There was no statistical difference in the number of programs applied to during in-person vs VI (mean difference (95% conļ¬dence interval 0.72, ā2.8 ā 4.2). A majority matched in their preferred state both during VI (60.4%) and in-person interviews (65.7%). The difference was not statistically signiļ¬cant (P = 0.45).Conclusion: While more PEM fellowship applicants applied outside the geographic area where their residency was and to the Paciļ¬c region, there was no overall increase in the number of programs or geographic areas PEM applicants applied to during VI as compared to in-person interview seasons. As this was the ļ¬rst two years of VI, ongoing data collection will further identify trends and the impactof VI