14 research outputs found
Sagavanirktok River Spring Breakup Observations 2016
In 2015, spring breakup on the Sagavanirktok River near Deadhorse was characterized by high
flows that destroyed extensive sections of the Dalton Highway, closing the road for nearly 3
weeks. This unprecedented flood also damaged infrastructure that supports the trans-Alaska
pipeline, though the pipeline itself was not damaged. The Alaska Department of Transportation
and Public Facilities (ADOT&PF) and the Alyeska Pipeline Service Company made emergency
repairs to their respective infrastructure.
In December 2015, aufeis accumulation was observed by ADOT&PF personnel. In January
2016, a research team with the University of Alaska Fairbanks began monitoring and researching
the aufeis and local hydroclimatology. Project objectives included determining ice elevations,
identifying possible water sources, establishing surface meteorological conditions prior to
breakup, measuring hydrosedimentological conditions (discharge, water level, and suspended
sediment concentration) during breakup, and reviewing historical imagery of the aufeis feature.
Ice surface elevations were surveyed with Global Positioning System (GPS) techniques in late
February and again in mid-April, and measureable volume changes were calculated. However,
river ice thickness obtained from boreholes near Milepost 394 (MP394) in late February and
mid-April revealed no significant changes. It appears that flood mitigation efforts by ADOT&PF
in the area contributed to limited vertical growth in ice at the boreholes. End-of-winter snow
surveys throughout the watershed indicate normal or below normal snow water equivalents
(SWE 10 cm). An imagery analysis of the lower Sagavanirktok aufeis from late winter for the
past 17 years shows the presence of ice historically at the MP393–MP396 area.
Water levels and discharge were relatively low in 2016 compared with 2015. The mild breakup
in 2016 seems to have been due to temperatures dropping below freezing after the flow began.
Spring 2015 was characterized by warm temperatures throughout the basin during breakup,
which produced the high flows that destroyed sections of the Dalton Highway.
A comparison of water levels at the East Bank Station during 2015 and 2016 indicates that the
2015 maximum water level was approximately 1 m above the 2016 maximum water level.
ii
Maximum measured discharge in 2016 was approximately half of that measured in 2015 in the
lower Sagavanirktok River. Representative suspended sediment sizes (D50) ranged from 20 to 50
microns (medium to coarse silt).
An objective of this study was to determine the composition and possible sources of water in the
aufeis at the lower Sagavanirktok River. During the winter months and prior to breakup in 2016,
overflow water was collected, primarily near the location of the aufeis, but also at upriver
locations. Simultaneously possible contributing water sources were sampled between January
and July 2016, including snow, glacial meltwater, and river water. Geochemical analyses were
performed on all samples. It was found that the overflow water which forms the lower
Sagavanirktok aufeis is most similar (R2 = 0.997) to the water that forms the aufeis at the
Sagavanirktok River headwaters (Ivishak River), thought to be fed by relatively consistent
groundwater sources.ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................... i
LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ v
LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... ix
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND DISCLAIMER ........................................................................... x
CONVERSION FACTORS, UNITS, WATER QUALITY UNITS, VERTICAL AND
HORIZONTAL DATUM, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS ............................................. xi
ABBREVIATIONS, ACRONYMS, AND SYMBOLS .............................................................. xiii
1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1
2 STUDY AREA ........................................................................................................................ 6
3 METHODOLOGY AND EQUIPMENT ................................................................................ 6
3.1 Aufeis Extent .................................................................................................................... 7
3.1.1 Field Methods ........................................................................................................... 7
3.1.2 Structure from Motion Imagery ................................................................................ 8
3.1.3 Imagery ..................................................................................................................... 8
3.2 Surface Meteorology ...................................................................................................... 10
3.3 Water Levels .................................................................................................................. 11
3.4 Discharge Measurements ............................................................................................... 13
3.5 Suspended Sediment ...................................................................................................... 16
3.6 Water Chemistry ............................................................................................................ 17
3.6.1 Sampling ................................................................................................................. 17
3.6.2 Trace Element Analysis .......................................................................................... 19
3.6.3 Data Analysis .......................................................................................................... 19
4 RESULTS .............................................................................................................................. 20
4.1 Air Temperature ............................................................................................................. 20
4.2 Wind Speed and Direction ............................................................................................. 29
4.3 Annual Precipitation ....................................................................................................... 30
4.4 Cold Season Precipitation .............................................................................................. 32
4.5 Warm Season Precipitation ............................................................................................ 36
4.6 Aufeis Extent .................................................................................................................. 40
4.6.1 Historical Aufeis at Franklin Bluffs ........................................................................ 40
4.6.2 Delineating Ice Surface Elevation with GPS and Aerial Imagery .......................... 46
4.6.3 Ice Boreholes .......................................................................................................... 55
iv
4.6.4 Ice Accumulation (SR50) ....................................................................................... 58
4.6.5 Ice Thickness and Volume ...................................................................................... 60
4.7 Surface Water Hydrology............................................................................................... 62
4.7.1 Sagavanirktok River at MP318 (DSS4) .................................................................. 67
4.7.2 Sagavanirktok River at Happy Valley (DSS3) ....................................................... 70
4.7.3 Sagavanirktok River Below the Ivishak River (DSS2)........................................... 73
4.7.4 Sagavanirktok River at East Bank (DSS5) Near Franklin Bluffs ........................... 76
4.7.5 Sagavanirktok River at MP405 (DSS1) West Channel .......................................... 85
4.7.6 Additional Field Observations ................................................................................ 86
4.8 Suspended Sediment ...................................................................................................... 87
4.9 Water Chemistry ............................................................................................................ 91
5 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................... 96
6 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................... 99
7 APPENDICES ..................................................................................................................... 10
Hydrology and Meteorology of the Central Alaskan Arctic: Data Collection and Analysis
The availability of environmental data for unpopulated areas of Alaska can best be described as
sparse; however, these areas have resource development potential. The central Alaskan Arctic
region north of the Brooks Range (referred to as the North Slope) is no exception in terms of
both environmental data and resource potential. This area was the focus of considerable oil/gas
exploration immediately following World War II. Unfortunately, very little environmental data
were collected in parallel with the exploration. Soon after the oil discovery at Prudhoe Bay in
November 1968, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) started collecting discharge data at three
sites in the neighborhood of Prudhoe Bay and one small watershed near Barrow. However, little
complementary meteorological data (like precipitation) were collected to support the streamflow
observations. In 1985, through a series of funded research projects, researchers at the University
of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF), Water and Environmental Research Center (WERC), began
installing meteorological stations on the North Slope in the central Alaskan Arctic. The number
of stations installed ranged from 1 in 1985 to 3 in 1986, 12 in 1996, 24 in 2006, 23 in 2010, and
7 in 2014. Researchers from WERC also collected hydrological data at the following streams:
Imnavait Creek (1985 to present), Upper Kuparuk River (1993 to present), Putuligayuk River
(1999 to present, earlier gauged by USGS), Kadleroshilik River (2006 to 2010), Shaviovik River
(2006 to 2010), No Name River (2006 to 2010), Chandler River (2009 to 2013), Anaktuvuk
River (2009 to 2013), Lower Itkillik River (2012 to 2013), and Upper Itkillik River (2009 to
2013). These catchments vary in size, and runoff generation can emanate from the coastal plain,
the foothills or mountains, or any combination of these locations. Snowmelt runoff in late
May/early June is the most significant hydrological event of the year, except at small watersheds.
For these watersheds, rain/mixed snow events in July and August have produced the floods of
record. Ice jams are a major concern, especially in the larger river systems. Solid cold season
precipitation is mostly uniform over the area, while warm season precipitation is greater in the
mountains and foothills than on the coastal plain (roughly 3:2:1, mountains:foothills:
coastal plain).The results reported here are primarily for the drainages of the Itkillik, Anaktuvuk,
and Chandler River basins, where a proposed transportation corridor is being considered. Results
for 2011 and before can be found in earlier reports.ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................... i
LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ v
LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... x
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND DISCLAIMER ........................................................................ xiii
CONVERSION FACTORS, UNITS, WATER QUALITY UNITS, VERTICAL AND
HORIZONTAL DATUM, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS ........................................... xiv
ABBREVIATIONS, ACRONYMS, AND SYMBOLS .............................................................. xvi
1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1
2 PRIOR RELATED PUBLICATIONS .................................................................................... 5
3 STUDY AREA ........................................................................................................................ 7
4 PREVIOUS STUDIES .......................................................................................................... 11
5 METHODOLOGY AND EQUIPMENT .............................................................................. 15
5.1 Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler ................................................................................. 17
5.2 Discharge Measurements ............................................................................................... 17
5.3 Suspended Sediments ..................................................................................................... 20
5.3.1 River Sediment ........................................................................................................ 21
5.3.2 Suspended Sediment Observations ......................................................................... 21
5.3.3 Suspended Sediment Discharge .............................................................................. 22
5.3.4 Turbidity ................................................................................................................. 23
5.3.5 Bed Sediment Distribution ...................................................................................... 23
5.3.6 Suspended Sediment Grain-Size Distribution ........................................................ 24
6 RESULTS .............................................................................................................................. 25
6.1 Air Temperature and Relative Humidity ........................................................................ 25
6.2 Wind Speed and Direction ............................................................................................. 30
6.3 Net Radiation .................................................................................................................. 38
6.4 Warm Season Precipitation ............................................................................................ 40
6.5 Cold Season Precipitation .............................................................................................. 46
6.6 Annual Precipitation ....................................................................................................... 52
6.7 Soil ................................................................................................................................. 55
6.7.1 Soil Temperature ..................................................................................................... 56
6.7.1.1 Results ................................................................................................................. 57
6.7.2 Soil Moisture ........................................................................................................... 60
6.7.2.1 Results ................................................................................................................. 61
6.8 North Slope Climatology ............................................................................................... 63
6.8.1 Air Temperature ...................................................................................................... 63
6.8.2 Precipitation ............................................................................................................ 65
6.8.2.1 Warm Season Precipitation ................................................................................. 65
6.8.2.2 Cold Season Precipitation ................................................................................... 68
6.8.2.3 Annual Total Precipitation .................................................................................. 70
6.9 Surface Water Hydrology ............................................................................................... 72
6.9.1 Itkillik River ............................................................................................................ 73
6.9.2 Upper Itkillik River ................................................................................................. 74
6.9.2.1 Dye Trace Results, Upper Itkillik River .............................................................. 81
6.9.3 Lower Itkillik River 2013 Breakup and Spring Flood ............................................ 84
6.9.4 Anaktuvuk River ..................................................................................................... 91
6.9.5 Chandler River ...................................................................................................... 100
6.9.6 Additional Field Observations .............................................................................. 107
6.10 River Sediment Results ................................................................................................ 117
6.10.1 Correlation between Isco and Depth-Integrated Samples ..................................... 117
6.10.2 Suspended Sediment Rating Curves ..................................................................... 118
6.10.3 Suspended Sediment Concentrations .................................................................... 119
6.10.4 Suspended Sediment Discharge ............................................................................ 125
6.10.5 Turbidity ............................................................................................................... 129
6.10.6 Bed Sediment Distribution .................................................................................... 134
6.10.7 Suspended Sediment Grain-Size Distribution ...................................................... 136
7 HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 139
7.1 Precipitation Frequency Analysis ................................................................................. 139
7.2 Manning’s Roughness Coefficient (n) Calculations Revisited .................................... 142
7.3 Hydrological Modeling ................................................................................................ 147
8 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................. 157
9 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................... 163
10 APPENDICES ..................................................................................................................... 169
Appendix A – Air Temperature and Relative Humidity
Appendix B – Wind Speed and Direction: Wind Roses
Appendix C – Cumulative Warm Season Precipitation for All Years at Each Station and
Cumulative Warm Season Precipitation by Year for All Stations, 2007 to 2013
Appendix D – Soil Temperature and Moisture Content
Appendix E – Rating Curves and Discharge Measurement Summarie
Recommended from our members
Panel on protection and management of plutonium: Subpanel on safeguards and security
Nuclear materials safeguards and security systems are described in the context of the nuclear nonproliferation regime. Materials of interest to safeguards, threats, proposals to strengthen International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards, evolving safeguards issues and requirements, system effectiveness, and elements of a global nuclear materials management regime are discussed. Safeguards are seen as an essential element of nuclear materials management, but not a driver for decisions regarding nuclear power or the disposal of excess weapon nuclear materials
Recommended from our members
Nuclear materials safeguards for the future
Basic concepts of domestic and international safeguards are described, with an emphasis on safeguards systems for the fuel cycles of commercial power reactors. Future trends in institutional and technical measures for nuclear materials safeguards are outlined. The conclusion is that continued developments in safeguards approaches and technology, coupled with institutional measures that facilitate the global management and protection of nuclear materials, are up to the challenge of safeguarding the growing inventories of nuclear materials in commercial fuel cycles in technologically advanced States with stable governments that have signed the nonproliferation treaty. These same approaches also show promise for facilitating international inspection of excess weapons materials and verifying a fissile materials cutoff convention
Recommended from our members
The status of United States R&D programs in safeguards and physical protection
Recommended from our members
Gas-phase UF/sub 6/ enrichment monitor for enrichment plant safeguards
An in-line enrichment monitor is being developed to provide real-time enrichment data for the gas-phase UF/sub 6/ feed stream of an enrichment plant. The nondestructive gamma-ray assay method can be used to determine the enrichment of natural UF/sub 6/ with a relative precision of better than 1% for a wide range of pressures
Recommended from our members
Process: (international) safeguards interface at the Portsmouth GCEP from the safeguards technology developer's viewpoint
The design of a major portion of a safeguards system for possible use by IAEA at the Portsmouth Gas Centrifuge Enrichment Plant is described from the viewpoint of the safeguards technology developer. The process-safeguards interface is reviewed, including safeguards, process, and operational constraints on the safeguards system. The conflicting requirements of the IAEA and the plant operator are minimized through the use of advanced technology that allows safeguards data to be acquired, analyzed, and reported in an automated, unattended mode. The proposed safeguards system will reduce the impact of the inspections on both the operator and the IAEA
Recommended from our members
Verification of classified fissile material using unclassified attributes
This paper reports on the most recent efforts of US technical experts to explore verification by IAEA of unclassified attributes of classified excess fissile material. Two propositions are discussed: (1) that multiple unclassified attributes could be declared by the host nation and then verified (and reverified) by the IAEA in order to provide confidence in that declaration of a classified (or unclassified) inventory while protecting classified or sensitive information; and (2) that attributes could be measured, remeasured, or monitored to provide continuity of knowledge in a nonintrusive and unclassified manner. They believe attributes should relate to characteristics of excess weapons materials and should be verifiable and authenticatable with methods usable by IAEA inspectors. Further, attributes (along with the methods to measure them) must not reveal any classified information. The approach that the authors have taken is as follows: (1) assume certain attributes of classified excess material, (2) identify passive signatures, (3) determine range of applicable measurement physics, (4) develop a set of criteria to assess and select measurement technologies, (5) select existing instrumentation for proof-of-principle measurements and demonstration, and (6) develop and design information barriers to protect classified information. While the attribute verification concepts and measurements discussed in this paper appear promising, neither the attribute verification approach nor the measurement technologies have been fully developed, tested, and evaluated
Recommended from our members
Selected nondestructive assay instrumentation for an international safeguards system at uranium enrichment plants
A selected set of nondestructive assay instruments for an international safeguards system at uranium enrichment plants is currently under development. These instruments are of three types: in-line enrichment meters for feed, product, and tails streams; area radiation monitors for direct detection of high-enriched uranium production, and an enrichment meter for spent alumina trap material. The current status of the development of each of these instruments is discussed, with supporting data, as well as the role each would play in a total international safeguards system. 5 figures