Neuro-ophthalmic complications of vestibular schwannoma resection : current perspectives

Vestibular schwannomas (VSs), also called acoustic neuromas, are benign intracranial neoplasms of the vestibulocochlear (VIII) cranial nerve. Management options include “wait-and-scan,” stereotactic radiosurgery and surgical resection. Due to the proximity of the VIII nerve to the facial (VII) nerve in the cerebello-pontine angle, the VII nerve is particularly vulnerable to the effects of surgical resection. This can result in poor eye closure, lagophthalmos and resultant corneal exposure post VS resection. Additionally, compression from the tumor or resection can cause trigeminal (V) nerve damage and a desensate cornea. The combination of an exposed and desensate cornea puts the eye at risk of serious ocular complications including persistent epithelial defects, corneal ulceration, corneal vascularization, corneal melting and potential perforation. The abducens (VI) nerve can be affected by a large intracranial VS causing raised intracranial pressure (a false localizing sign) or as a result of damage to the VI nerve at the time of resection. Other types of neurogenic strabismus are rare and typically transient. Contralaterally beating nystagmus as a consequence of vestibular dysfunction is common post-operatively. This generally settles to pre-operative levels as central compensation occurs. Ipsilaterally beating nystagmus post-operatively should prompt investigation for post-operative cerebrovascular complications. Papilledema (and subsequent optic atrophy) can occur as a result of a large VS causing raised intracranial pressure. Where papilledema follows surgical resection of a VS, it can indicate that cerebral venous sinus thrombosis has occurred. Poor visual function following VS resection can result as a combination of all these potential complications and is more likely with larger tumors

EyeCee One preloaded intraocular lens: are patients with glaucoma more at risk?

Objective: The Medicine and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency reported links of raised intraocular pressure (IOP) with recently implanted EyeCee One intraocular lens (IOL). This work investigates if glaucomatous eyes were more susceptible to these postoperative IOP rises and if they required more intensive management. Methods: Retrospective observational study of all phacoemulsification surgery with implanted EyeCee One IOL, performed between 1 October 2022 and 26 January 2023 inclusive. Analysis: A significant IOP elevation was defined as an IOP rise of 10 mm Hg or more from preoperative to maximal postoperative IOP reading. The management of all patients who had a significant IOP elevation was reviewed. Glaucoma/ocular hypertension cases were identified and analysed against non-glaucomatous eyes and statistical analysis performed. Results: 112 glaucoma and 671 non-glaucoma cases identified; 19.6% of the glaucoma cohort had a significant postoperative IOP rise compared with 8.9% of patients without glaucoma (OR 2.49 (95% CI 1.45 to 4.20) p=0.0014). In the glaucoma cohort, 12.5% had an increase in the number of topical IOP-lowering agents (mean increase 1.65±1.58), 6.3% required systemic treatment and 2.7% surgical intervention. In the non-glaucoma group, 3.3% required topical treatment (mean number of agents 0.88±1.34), 0.8% required systemic treatment and 0.2% surgical intervention. Conclusion: This study shows that during the time frame in question, patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension who had an EyeCee One IOL were almost two and a half times more likely to have a postoperative rise of 10 mm Hg or more in IOP following routine cataract surgery, requiring more aggressive management

Thyroid cytology—nuclear versus architectural atypia within the “Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance” Bethesda category have significantly different rates of malignancy

10.1002/cncy.21823Cancer Cytopathology1254245-25