44 research outputs found

    Risk factors for anxiety and depression among pregnant women during COVID-19 pandemic-Results of a web-based multinational cross-sectional study

    Get PDF
    Objective To assess risk factors for anxiety and depression among pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic using Mind-COVID, a prospective cross-sectional study that compares outcomes in middle-income economies and high-income economies. Methods A total of 7102 pregnant women from 12 high-income economies and nine middle-income economies were included. The web-based survey used two standardized instruments, General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Result Pregnant women in high-income economies reported higher PHQ-9 (0.18 standard deviation [SD], P < 0.001) and GAD-7 (0.08 SD, P = 0.005) scores than those living in middle-income economies. Multivariate regression analysis showed that increasing PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scales were associated with mental health problems during pregnancy and the need for psychiatric treatment before pregnancy. PHQ-9 was associated with a feeling of burden related to restrictions in social distancing, and access to leisure activities. GAD-7 scores were associated with a pregnancy-related complication, fear of adverse outcomes in children related to COVID-19, and feeling of burden related to finances. Conclusions According to this study, the imposed public health measures and hospital restrictions have left pregnant women more vulnerable during these difficult times. Adequate partner and family support during pregnancy and childbirth can be one of the most important protective factors against anxiety and depression, regardless of national economic status

    Is There an Added Neonatal Risk in Vacuum-Assisted Deliveries with Nuchal Cord?

    No full text
    This retrospective cohort study assessed the association between nuchal cord and adverse outcomes during vacuum-assisted delivery (VAD). Women with singleton pregnancies, 34–41-weeks gestation, who underwent VAD, from 2014 to 2020 were included. The primary outcome was umbilical cord pH ≤ 7.1. Secondary outcomes were neonatal intensive care unit admission, Apgar scores, pH p = 0.001) and higher maternal BMI (23.6 ± 4.3 vs. 23.1 ± 5, p = 0.017). Nuchal cord was associated with higher rates of induction (207 (19.5%) vs. 431 (16%), p = 0.009) and lower birthweights (3185 ± 413 vs. 3223 ± 436 g, p = 0.013). The main indication for VAD in 830 (80.7%) of the nuchal cord group was non-reassuring fetal heart rate (NRFHR) vs. 1989 (75.6%) controls (p = 0.004). The second stage was shorter in the nuchal cord group (128 ± 81 vs. 141 ± 80 min, p < 0.001). Multivariate regression found nulliparity, induction and birthweight as independent risk factors for nuchal cord VAD. Although induction and NRFHR rates were higher in VAD with nuchal cord, the rate of umbilical cord acidemia was not

    The magnitude of elevated maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy complications

    No full text
    This study assessed the correlation between the magnitude of the elevation in maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin (MShCG) levels and pregnancy complications. Among 80,716 screened pregnancies, 120 with moderately elevated MShCG (3.00–5.99 MoM) were compared to 84 with extremely elevated MShCG >6.00 MoM. A control series of 120 women with normal MShCG (<3.00 MoM) were matched. Rates of intrauterine growth restriction, preterm labour, antepartum foetal death (APFD), pre-eclampsia, and placental abruption were analysed. We found that the study group had more adverse outcomes than the control group (73/204 [36%] vs. 18/120 [15%]; p < .0001). The rate was higher in the extremely elevated group than in the moderately elevated group (43/84 [51%] vs. 30/120 [25%]; p < .0001). All 12 cases of APFD (14%) occurred among the extremely elevated series. In conclusion, adverse pregnancy outcomes are more common in women with extremely elevated MShCG. The patients should receive counselling regarding this trend and undergo close pregnancy monitoring.Impact statement • What is already known on this subject?In addition to its contribution to Down syndrome (DS) screening, maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin (MShCG) levels are a marker for pregnancy complications such as intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), preterm labour (PTL), antepartum fatal death (APFD), pre-eclampsia (PE), placental abruption (PA) and fetal malformations with or without chromosomal aberrations. • What the results of this study add? We found that in the presence of elevated MShCG levels, the incidence of IUGR and PTL increased. PE increased clinically, but statistical significance was seen only when MShCG was extremely elevated (≥ 6.00 MoM). APFD and PA were associated with very high MShCG levels only. • What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Women with high MShCG levels should be counselled. In case of very high levels (≥ 6.00 MoM), the risk of APFD and PA should be discussed. The pregnancy should be monitored for IUGR, PTL and PE. In view of the limited number of enrolled patients with very high levels of MShCG, the experience of other institutions is needed to corroborate these findings

    Gestational Diabetes Type 2: Variation in High-Density Lipoproteins Composition and Function

    No full text
    Aims: Class A2 gestational diabetes mellitus (GDMA2) has short- and long-term effects on the mother and child. These may include abnormalities of placentation, damage to endothelial cells and cardiovascular disease. This research investigated the function and composition of high-density lipoproteins (HDL) among women with GDMA2 and their fetuses. Methods: Thirty pregnant women were recruited during admission for delivery. The function and expression of HDL, paraoxonase1 (PON1) and apolipoprotein A1 (APOA1) in the blood samples and the placental tissue were evaluated. The effect of HDL on migration of endothelial cells was measured in vitro. Results: Compared to normal pregnancy (NP), APOA1 in the maternal plasma of women with GDMA2 was decreased. More APOA1 and PON1 were released from HDL of women with GDMA2, compared to NP. Placental APOA1 and PON1 were decreased in GDMA2. For endothelial cells stimulated with TNF&alpha;, HDL cell migration was decreased when cells were evaluated with NP-HDL, as compared to GDMA2-HDL. Conclusions: GDMA2 affects the composition and function of HDL in plasma. Changes in HDL commonly seen in GDMA2 were observed in maternal and placental samples, but not in cord samples. These results might indicate a placental role in protecting the fetus by preserving the components and functions of HDL and require further investigation

    Factors Affecting Clinical over and Underestimation of Fetal Weight&mdash;A Retrospective Cohort

    No full text
    Clinical estimation of fetal weight is an integral component of obstetric care that might dictate the timing and mode of delivery. Inaccurate fetal weight estimation might result in unnecessary interventions or in underestimating potential risks, resulting in inappropriate intrapartum care. This retrospective study assessed factors associated with under- or overestimation of birthweight and evaluated the obstetric implications. It included singleton births &ge;24 w with clinically estimated fetal weight (EFW) up to 1 week before delivery, during 2014&ndash;2020. Estimates &gt;&plusmn;10% of the actual birthweight were considered inaccurate and categorized as overestimation (&gt;10% heavier than the actual birthweight) or underestimation (&gt;10% smaller than the birthweight). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to reveal factors associated with inaccurate EFW. Maternal characteristics and obstetric outcomes were compared. The primary outcomes for the overestimation group were the neonatal composite adverse outcome, induction of labor and cesarean delivery rates. The primary outcomes for the underestimation group were rates of shoulder dystocia, 3rd- or 4th-degree perineal lacerations, and failed vacuum extraction. Among 38,615 EFW, 5172 (13.4%) were underestimated, 6695 (17.3%) were overestimated and 27,648 (69.3%) accurate. Multivariable logistic regression found increasing gestational age as an independent risk-factor for underestimation (odds ratio (OR) 1.15 for every additional week, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12&ndash;1.2). Major factors independently associated with overestimation were nulliparity (OR 1.95, CI 1.76&ndash;2.16), maternal obesity (OR 1.52, CI 1.33&ndash;1.74), smoking (OR 1.6, CI 1.33&ndash;1.93), and oligohydramnios (OR 1.92, CI 1.47&ndash;2.5). Underestimation was an independent risk-factor for shoulder dystocia (OR 1.61, CI 1.05&ndash;2.46) and 3rd- or 4th-degree perineal lacerations (OR 1.59, CI 1.05&ndash;2.43). Overestimation was an independent risk-factor for neonatal composite adverse outcome (OR 1.15, CI 1.02&ndash;1.3), induced labor (OR 1.30, CI 1.21&ndash;1.40) and cesarean delivery (OR 1.59, CI 1.41&ndash;1.79). Clinicians should be aware of factors and adverse obstetric implications associated with over- or underestimation of birthweight

    Are There Similarities in Pregnancy Complications and Delivery Outcomes among Sisters?

    No full text
    This retrospective cohort study evaluated pregnancy outcomes and similarities between pairs of nulliparous sisters with a singleton fetus who delivered between 2013 and 2020. The &ldquo;Sister-1 group&rdquo; was defined as the sibling who delivered first, while the &ldquo;Sister-2 group&rdquo; included the siblings who gave birth after Sister-1. Obstetrical complications and delivery outcomes were compared. The relative risk for recurrence of a complication in Sister-2 was calculated. The study included 743 sister pairs. There were no between-group differences in maternal BMI, gestational age at delivery, gravidity, smoking, or epidural rates. The Sister-2 group was older than the Sister-1 group (26.4 &plusmn; 5 vs. 25.8 &plusmn; 4.7 years, respectively, p = 0.05). Higher birthweights and more large-for-gestational-age infants characterized the Sister-2 group compared with the Sister-1 group (3241 &plusmn; 485 g vs. 3148 &plusmn; 536 g, p &lt; 0.001 and 7.7% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.025, respectively). There were no between-group differences in the rate of small-for-gestational-age, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders, pre-term births, vacuum extraction, or cesarean deliveries. Logistic regression analysis found that if Sister-1 underwent vacuum extraction, her sibling had an increased risk for vacuum delivery (adjusted RR 3.03, 95% CI 1.4&ndash;6.7; p = 0.003) compared with those whose sibling (Sister-1) did not. There was a three-fold risk of vacuum extraction delivery between sisters. This finding could be related to biological inheritance, environmental factors, and/or psychological issues that may affect similarities between siblings&rsquo; delivery outcomes

    Vacuum-Assisted Delivery Complication Rates Based on Ultrasound-Estimated Fetal Weight

    No full text
    This retrospective cohort study investigated the association between ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes after vacuum-assisted delivery (VAD). It included women with singleton pregnancies at 34–41 weeks gestation, who underwent ultrasonographic pre-labor EFW and VAD in an academic institution, over 6 years. Adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes included shoulder dystocia, clavicular fracture, or third- and fourth-degree perineal tears. A receiver–operator characteristic curve was used to identify the optimal weight cut-off value to predict adverse outcomes. Fetuses above and below this point were compared. Multivariate analysis was used to control for factors that could lead to adverse outcomes. Eight-hundred and fifty women met the inclusion criteria and had sonographic EFW within two-weeks before delivery. Receiver–operator characteristic curve analysis found that ultrasonographic EFW 3666 g is the optimal threshold for adverse outcomes. Based on these results, outcomes were compared using EFW 3700 g. The average EFW in the ≥3700 g group (n = 220, 25.9%) was 3898 ± 154 g (average birthweight 3710 ± 324 g). In the group n = 630, 74.1%), average EFW was 3064 ± 411 g (birthweight 3120 ± 464 g). Shoulder dystocia and clavicular fractures were more frequent in the higher EFW group (6.4% and 2.3% vs. 1.6% and 0.5%, respectively; p p = 0.02). Multivariate logistic regression analysis found maternal age, diabetes and sonographic EFW ≥ 3700 g as independent risk-factors for adverse outcomes. Sonographic EFW ≥ 3700 g is an independent risk-factor for adverse outcomes in VAD. This should be considered when choosing the optimal mode of delivery

    The association between maternal serum first trimester free βhCG, second trimester intact hCG levels and foetal growth restriction and preeclampsia

    No full text
    The purpose of this study was to analyse the association between free beta hCG (fβhCG) increased levels and pregnancy complications (PC), foetal growth restriction (FGR) and preeclampsia (PE). This connection was evaluated in two stages (i) investigating the association between those PC with first trimester fβhCG and second trimester intact hCG (ihCG), and (ii) studying the association between these two analytes in the same pregnancy. This was a retrospective study in two settings: medical centre that provided data on fβhCG and ihCG levels in pregnancies with FGR and PE, and central laboratory that provided fβhCG and ihCG levels that were compared in the same pregnancy. No association was found between those PC and the hCG analytes, except for elevated ihCG levels and FGR. Elevated fβhCG (>3.00 MoM) was found in 570/16,849 (3.4%) women. However, only 14% of whom had elevated second trimester ihCG. A positive correlation was found between the magnitude of first trimester fβhCG levels and the percentage of women who had elevated second trimester ihCG. This association was determined by the magnitude of the elevation of fβhCG levels.Impact statement What is already known on this subject: The two analytes, first trimester fβhCG and second trimester ihCG, are independently produced and parameters of the biochemical screening during pregnancy. What the results of this study add: Referring to 3.00 MoM as cut-off levels, most pregnancies with elevated levels of first trimester fβhCG will have normal ihCG second trimester levels. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research: The risk of developing pregnancy complications, FGR and PE should be associated with second trimester ihCG levels. About 3.5% of women had high fβhCG levels during the first trimester. However, only 14% also had increased ihCG levels, defined as >3.00 MoM; additional studies are needed to explore the association between increased first trimester fβhCG levels and the risk of developing pregnancy complications, independent of ihCG levels in the second trimester
    corecore