5 research outputs found

    Exit Site Infection due to Mycobacterium chelonae in an Elderly Patient on Peritoneal Dialysis

    No full text
    Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are rarely isolated from peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated catheter infections. However, NTM infection is usually difficult to treat and leads to catheter loss. Prompt diagnosis is essential for appropriate treatment. A 70-year-old Japanese man who had been on PD for 2 years and with a medical history of 2 episodes of exit site infections (ESIs) due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was admitted to the hospital due to suspected ESI recurrence. However, Gram staining of the pus revealed no gram-positive cocci. Instead, weakly stained gram-positive rods were observed after 7 days of incubation, which were also positive for acid-fast staining. Rapidly growing NTM Mycobacterium chelonae was isolated on day 14. Despite administering a combination antibiotic therapy, ESI could not be controlled, and catheter removal surgery was performed on day 21. Although PD was discontinued temporarily, the patient did not require hemodialysis, without any uremic symptoms. The catheter was reinserted on day 48, and PD was reinitiated on day 61. The patient was discharged on day 65. Antibiotic therapy was continued for 3 months after discharge, with no indications of recurrent infections observed. It is important to consider the risk of NTM infections in patients on PD. Acid-fast staining could be a key test for prompt diagnosis and provision of an appropriate treatment

    Severe hypoglycemia during pneumocystis pneumonia treatment associated with trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole use in a patient on peritoneal dialysis

    No full text
    Abstract Background Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) is an essential antimicrobial agent for treating pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP). Furthermore, the risk of hypoglycemia is increased with the co-administration of sulfonylurea due to the presence of the same sulfanilamide structural group in SMX and sulfonylurea. However, hypoglycemia caused by a single administration of TMP/SMX is a rare adverse reaction, and not many cases have been reported. Renal failure is a risk factor for hypoglycemia with single TMP/SMX administration. Case presentation A 54-year-old Japanese woman on peritoneal dialysis (PD) for 10 years was admitted to our hospital for the suspicion of PCP. She underwent immunosuppressive treatment with oral prednisolone (3 mg/day) and a subcutaneous injection of adalimumab (40 mg) every 2 weeks for rheumatoid arthritis. We initiated the administration of a low-to-moderate dose of TMP/SMX (TMP equivalent to TMP/SMX, approximately 8 mg/kg/day) in the patient, considering that she was on PD. At 10 days after administration, the patient became unconscious, and blood test results showed that her blood glucose level was low (15 mg/dL). Unlike hypoglycemia, her serum insulin levels were abnormally high (69.4 μU/mL) at that time. Glucose injection was used for correcting the hypoglycemia, but it was refractory. Highly concentrated glucose infusion was needed to maintain her blood glucose level normal. Her serum insulin level was confirmed to have returned to normal (4.0 μU/mL) at 9 days after completing the TMP/SMX treatment. Conclusions We suspected that the refractory hypoglycemia in this case was caused by high levels of insulin secretion due to the accumulation of TMP/SMX. One of the risk factors in this patient was the low excretion rate of TMP/SMX into the PD fluid. Although hypoglycemia is a rare complication of TMP/SMX, we should consider this risk during TMP/SMX use in patients, especially those on PD

    Severe refractory TAFRO syndrome requiring continuous renal replacement therapy complicated with Trichosporon asahii infection in the lungs and myocardial infarction: an autopsy case report and literature review

    No full text
    Abstract Background TAFRO (thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, reticulin myelofibrosis/renal failure, and organomegaly) syndrome is a systemic inflammatory disorder and unique clinicopathological variant of idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease that was proposed in Japan. Prompt diagnosis is critical because TAFRO syndrome is a progressive and life threating disease. Some cases are refractory to immunosuppressive treatments. Renal impairment is frequently observed in patients with TAFRO syndrome, and some severe cases require hemodialysis. Histological evaluation is important to understand the pathophysiology of TAFRO syndrome. However, systemic histopathological evaluation through autopsy in TAFRO syndrome has been rarely reported previously. Case presentation A 46-year-old Japanese man with chief complaints of fever and abdominal distension was diagnosed with TAFRO syndrome through imaging studies, laboratory findings, and pathological findings on cervical lymph node and bone marrow biopsies. Interleukin (IL)-6 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels were remarkably elevated in both blood and ascites. Methylprednisolone (mPSL) pulse therapy was initiated on day 10, followed by combination therapy with PSL and cyclosporine A. However, the amount of ascites did not respond to the treatment. The patient became anuric, and continuous renal replacement therapy was initiated from day 50. However, the patient suddenly experienced cardiac arrest associated with myocardial infarction (MI) on the same day. Although the emergent percutaneous coronary intervention was successfully performed, the patient died on day 52, despite intensive care. Autopsy was performed to ascertain the cause of MI and to identify the histopathological characteristics of TAFRO syndrome. Conclusions Bacterial peritonitis, systemic cytomegalovirus infection, and Trichosporon asahii infection in the lungs were observed on autopsy. In addition, sepsis-related myocardial calcification was suspected. Management of infectious diseases is critical to reduce mortality in patients with TAFRO syndrome. Although the exact cause of MI could not be identified on autopsy, we considered embolization by fungal hyphae as a possible cause. Endothelial injury possibly caused by excessive secretion of IL-6 and VEGF contributed to renal impairment. Fibrotic changes in anterior mediastinal fat tissue could be a characteristic pathological finding in patients with TAFRO syndrome

    Genetic architecture of alcohol consumption identified by a genotype-stratified GWAS, and impact on esophageal cancer risk in Japanese

    No full text
    <p><span>An East Asian-specific variant on <em>aldehyde</em> <em>dehydrogenase</em> <em>2</em> (<em>ALDH2</em> rs671, G>A) is the major genetic determinant of alcohol consumption. We performed an rs671 genotype-stratified genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis in up to 175,672 Japanese individuals to uncover additional loci associated with alcohol consumption in an rs671-dependent manner. Three loci (<em>GCKR</em>, <em>KLB</em>, and <em>ADH1B</em>)</span> <span>satisfied the genome-wide significance threshold in wild-type homozygotes (GG), whereas six loci (<em>GCKR</em>, <em>ADH1B</em>, <em>ALDH1B1</em>, <em>ALDH1A1</em>, <em>ALDH2</em>, and <em>GOT2</em>) did so in heterozygotes (GA). Of these, five loci showed genome-wide significant interaction with rs671. Genetic correlation analyses revealed ancestry-specific genetic architecture in heterozygotes. Subsequent polygenic risk scoring depicted interactions highlighted by stratified GWAS. Further, most discovered loci showed significant effects on risk of esophageal cancer, a representative alcohol-related disease, and multiple other phenotypes. Our results identify the genotype-specific genetic architecture of alcohol consumption and reveal its potential impact on alcohol-related disease risk.</span></p><p>No special software are required to open the files.</p><p>Funding provided by: Takeda Science Foundation<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/02y123g31<br>Award Number: </p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/004rtk039<br>Award Number: JP16ck0106095</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/004rtk039<br>Award Number: JP19ck0106266</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/004rtk039<br>Award Number: JP20km0105001</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/004rtk039<br>Award Number: JP20km0105002</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/004rtk039<br>Award Number: JP20km0105003</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/00hhkn466<br>Award Number: JP16H06277</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/00hhkn466<br>Award Number: JP26253041</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/00hhkn466<br>Award Number: JP20K10463</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/00hhkn466<br>Award Number: JP19KK0418</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/00hhkn466<br>Award Number: JP20K10471</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/004rtk039<br>Award Number: JP20km0105004</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/004rtk039<br>Award Number: JP16ek0109070h0003</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/004rtk039<br>Award Number: JP18kk0205008h0003</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/004rtk039<br>Award Number: JP18kk0205001s0703</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/004rtk039<br>Award Number: JP19ek0109283h0003</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/004rtk039<br>Award Number: JP19ek0109348h0002</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/004rtk039<br>Award Number: JP21gm4010006</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/004rtk039<br>Award Number: JP22km0405211</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/004rtk039<br>Award Number: JP22ek0410075</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/004rtk039<br>Award Number: JP22km0405217</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/004rtk039<br>Award Number: JP22ek0109594</p><p>Funding provided by: National Cancer Centre Japan<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/0025ww868<br>Award Number: 2022-A-20</p><p>Funding provided by: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/048rj2z13<br>Award Number: 17015018</p><p>Funding provided by: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/048rj2z13<br>Award Number: 221S0001</p><p>Funding provided by: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/048rj2z13<br>Award Number: 17015018</p><p>Funding provided by: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/048rj2z13<br>Award Number: 221S0001</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/00hhkn466<br>Award Number: 16H06277</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/00hhkn466<br>Award Number: 22H04923</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/00hhkn466<br>Award Number: JP17K07255</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/00hhkn466<br>Award Number: JP17KT0125</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/00hhkn466<br>Award Number: 22H00476</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Science and Technology Agency<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/00097mb19<br>Award Number: JPMJMS2021</p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Science and Technology Agency<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/00097mb19<br>Award Number: JPMJMS2024</p><p>Funding provided by: National Cancer Centre Japan<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/0025ww868<br>Award Number: 28-A-19</p><p>Funding provided by: National Cancer Centre Japan<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/0025ww868<br>Award Number: 31-A-18</p><p>Funding provided by: Yamagiwa Yoshida Memorial UICC International Cancer Study Grants<br>Award Number: </p><p>Funding provided by: Kobayashi Foundation for Cancer Research<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/02qjq5342<br>Award Number: </p><p>Funding provided by: National Cancer Centre Japan<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/0025ww868<br>Award Number: 23-A-31</p><p>Funding provided by: National Cancer Centre Japan<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/0025ww868<br>Award Number: 26-A-2</p><p>Funding provided by: National Cancer Centre Japan<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/0025ww868<br>Award Number: 29-A-4</p><p>Funding provided by: Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/00q3q5393<br>Award Number: </p><p>Funding provided by: Osake-no-Kagaku Foundation*<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: <br>Award Number: </p><p>Funding provided by: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science<br>Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/00hhkn466<br>Award Number: 22H03350</p><p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span>Summary statistics for drinking amount and ever drinking four types of analysis, ALDH2 rs671 GG only, GA only, All and interaction with GA.</span></strong></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>These summary statistics were obtained from the analyses described below.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span>Study subjects and genotyping</span></strong></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>We performed a genome-wide meta-analysis based on the Japanese Consortium of Genetic Epidemiology studies (J-CGE) (Suzuki S et al. Cancer Sci 2021), the Nagahama Study (Funada S et al. J Urol 2018), and the BBJ Study (Hirata et al. J Epidemiol 2017<em>, </em>Nagai A et al. J Epidemiol 2017). The J-CGE consisted of the following Japanese population-based and hospital-based studies: the HERPACC Study (Hamajima N et al. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2001), the J-MICC Study (Hamajima N et al. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2007, Wakai et al. J Epidemiol 2011), the JPHC Study (Tsugane S et al. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2014), and the TMM Study (Hozawa A et al. J Epidemiol 2021). Individual study descriptions and an overview of the characteristics of the study populations are provided in the Supplementary Information and Supplementary Table 1.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span>Quality control and genotype imputation</span></strong></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Quality control for samples and SNPs was performed based on study-specific criteria (Supplemental Table 2). Genotype data in each study were imputed separately based on the 1000 Genomes Project reference panel (Phase 3, all ethnicities) (The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium Nature 2015). Phasing was performed with the use of SHAPEIT (v2) (Delaneau O et al. Nat Methos 2013) and Eagle (Loh PR et al. Nat Genet 2016), and imputation was performed using minimac3 (Das S et al. Nat Genet 2016), minimac4, or IMPUTE (v2) (Howie BN et al. PLoS Genet 2009). Information on the study-specific genotyping, imputation, quality control, and analysis tools is provided in Supplementary Table 2. After genotype imputation, further quality control was applied to each study. SNPs with an imputation quality of r<sup>2</sup> < 0.3 for minimac3 or minimac4, info < 0.4 for IMPUTE2 or an MAF of <0.01 were excluded. </span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span>Association analysis of SNPs with daily alcohol intake and drinking status</span></strong></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Association analysis of SNPs with daily alcohol intake and drinking status was performed on three different subject groups: the entire population, subjects with the rs671 GG genotype only, and subjects with the rs671 GA genotype only. Because the number of drinkers with the rs671 AA genotype was too small (Supplementary Table 3), association analysis in subjects with the rs671 AA genotype only was not conducted. Daily alcohol intake was base-2 log-transformed (log<sub>2</sub> (grammes/day + 1)). The association of daily alcohol intake with SNP allele dose for each study was assessed by linear regression analysis with adjustment for age, age<sup>2</sup>, sex, and the first 10 principal components. For the BBJ Study, the affection status of 47 diseases was further added as covariates. The association of drinking status with SNP allele dose for each study was assessed by logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age, age<sup>2</sup>, sex, the first 10 principal components, and disease affection status of 47 diseases (for the BBJ Study). The effect sizes and standard errors estimated in the association analysis were used in the subsequent meta-analysis. The association analysis was conducted using EPACTS (http://genome.sph.umich.edu/wiki/EPACTS), SNPTEST (Marchini J et al. Nat Genet 2007), or PLINK2 (Chang CC et al. GigaScience 2015).</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Association analysis, including interaction terms, was performed to evaluate the differential effects of each SNP on daily alcohol intake and drinking status between the GG and GA genotypes of rs671. In the interaction analysis for daily alcohol intake, the linear regression models were fit as the formula described in the Materials and Methods section. The GG genotype is coded as 0, and the GA genotype is coded as 1. Carriers of the AA genotype were excluded from the analysis. x<sub>snp</sub> is the imputed genotype coded as [0,2] for each SNP. c<sub>k</sub> is a covariate composed of age, age<sup>2</sup>, sex, the first 10 principal components, and 47 disease affection statuses (for the BBJ Study). The effect sizes of the interaction term, ß <sub>interaction</sub>, and its standard errors estimated in the association analysis were used in the subsequent meta-analysis. In the interaction analysis for drinking status, the logistic regression model was fit as the formula described in the Materials and Methods section. Other variables and procedures are as above. The association analysis, including the interaction term, was conducted using PLINK2 (Chang CC et al. GigaScience 2015). In this study, we employed rs671 genotypes directly extracted from SNP genotyping data, and no imputed data were used. With respect to concerns regarding genotype error, we further genotyped rs671 using TaqMan Assays with the 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) in all HERPACC samples in this study (<em>n</em> = 4,958). Results confirmed a 99.96% (<em>n</em> = 4,956) match of rs671 genotypes between the SNP microarray- and TaqMan-based data. The BBJ Study, the biggest data source in this study, also guaranteed a 100% concordance of rs671 genotyping between the SNP microarray and their in-house whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data (<em>n</em> = 2,798) in their previous study (Matoba N et al. Nat Hum Behav 2020). All the other cohorts, accounting for 20% of the data in this study, also used the <em>Illumina</em> genotyping platform (Supplementary Table 2), indicating that we can be assured of the accuracy of rs671 genotypes in these studies.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>To identify studies with inflated GWAS significance, which can result from population stratification, we computed the intercept from LDSC (Bulik-Sullivan BK et al. Nat Genet 2015). Before the meta-analysis, all study-specific results in the association analysis were corrected by multiplying the standard error of the effect size by the value of intercept from LDSC if the intercept of that study was greater than 1. </span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span>Meta-analysis</span></strong></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>The meta-analysis was performed with all Japanese subjects in the six cohorts (Supplementary Table 1). The results of association analyses for each SNP across the studies were combined with METAL software (Willer CJ et al. Bioinformatics 2010) by the fixed-effects inverse-variance-weighted method. Heterogeneity of effect sizes was assessed by <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> and Cochran's <em>Q </em>statistic. The meta-analysis included SNPs for which genotype data were available from at least three studies with a total sample size of at least 20,000 individuals for unstratified GWAS or interaction GWAS or 10,000 individuals for rs671-stratified GWAS. The genome-wide significance level α was set to a <em>P</em> value <5 × 10<sup>–8</sup>. <em>P</em>-values with <1.0×10<sup>−300</sup> was calculated with Rmpfr of the R package. To assess the inflation of the test statistics for the meta-analysis, we computed the genomic inflation factor, l, and intercept from LDSC (Freedman ML et al. Nat Genet 2004).</span></p&gt

    Genome-wide association meta-analysis identifies GP2 gene risk variants for pancreatic cancer

    No full text
    Previous genome-wide association studies have identified risk loci for pancreatic cancer but were centered on individuals of European ancestry. Here the authors identify GP2 gene variants associated with pancreatic cancer susceptibility in populations of East Asian ancestry
    corecore