194 research outputs found

    Response Rate Is Associated with Prolonged Survival in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Gefitinib or Erlotinib

    Get PDF
    Introduction:Gaining a higher response rate (RR) has usually been determined as a primary end point in phase II trials evaluating the efficacy of new molecular targeted drugs. However, a relationship between clinical response and survival benefit has not been well studied in the patients treated with molecular targeted agents.Methods:Prospective trials of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) monotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer were extracted from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the annual meetings in 2007 of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Cancer Conference, and World Conference on Lung Cancer.Correlation between clinical response and survival was examined using linear regression analysis. We also tried to compare the significance of RR as surrogate markers for survival with that of disease control rate (DCR) by calculating the area under their receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.Results:We identified 24 phase II trials and 4 phase III trials with a total of 6171 patients and 30 treatment arms, including 22 arms for the gefitinib group and 8 arms for the erlotinib group. Both RR and DCR strongly correlated with median survival time (MST; p < 0.0001 and p = 0.003, respectively). In an ROC analysis, the area under the ROC curve predicting MST prolongation by RR was 0.918, which was higher than the area under the ROC curve by DCR.Conclusions:We found a significant relationship between RR and MST in clinical trials with EGFR-TKIs. RR could be an independent surrogate marker for MST in the current response criteria in the clinical trials of EGFR-TKIs

    Adhesiolysis and targeted steroid/local anesthetic injection during epiduroscopy alleviates pain and reduces sensory nerve dysfunction in patients with chronic sciatica.

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adhesiolysis followed by the injection of steroid and local anesthetic during epiduroscopy on sensory nerve function, pain, and functional disability in patients with chronic sciatica. METHODS: Epidural adhesiolysis, using epiduroscopy, followed by the injection of steroid and local anesthetic, was scheduled in 19 patients with chronic sciatica refractory to lumbar epidural block. Sensory nerve function in the legs was tested with a series of 2000-Hz (Abeta-fiber), 250-Hz (Adelta-fiber), and 5-Hz (C-fiber) stimuli, using the current perception threshold (CPT), and CPT values and intensity of pain and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) scores were assessed before and 1 and 3 months after the epiduroscopy. RESULTS: At all frequencies, the CPT values in the affected legs of patients before the epiduroscopy were significantly higher than those in the unaffected legs. Epidural adhesiolysis was successfully performed in 16 of the 19 patients. In these patients, the CPT values at 2000 and 250 Hz, and the pain and RMDQ scores 1 and 3 months after the epiduroscopy were significantly lower than those before the epiduroscopy, while the CPT value at 5 Hz did change. CONCLUSION: Epidural adhesiolysis followed by the injection of steroid and local anesthetic during epiduroscopy alleviated pain, and functional disability, and reduced dysfunction of Abeta and Adelta fibers in patients with chronic sciatica
    corecore