3 research outputs found
La transplantation de myoblastes protège le muscle MDX du dommage induit par les contractions excentriques
La dystrophie musculaire de Duchenne est une dystrophie héréditaire secondaire à l’absence de la dystrophine, ce qui induit une faiblesse et une dégénérescence des muscles. Bien que plusieurs études ont démontré que la greffe de myoblastes permet de rétablir l’expression de la dystrophine, aucune étude physiologique n’a été réalisée, jusqu’à présent, pour démontrer qu’elle peut améliorer les propriétés contractiles du muscle. Dans ce travail, j’ai étudié l’effet de la greffe de myoblastes normaux sur les propriétés contractiles du muscle de la souris mdx, un modèle animal de la maladie de Duchenne. Mes travaux ont permis de démontrer que cette greffe protège le muscle mdx durant les contractions excentriques et que cet effet n’est pas expliqué seulement par l’expression de la dystrophine. En effet, l’étude des propriétés contractiles des muscles mdx transplantés avec des myoblastes mdx, montre que les muscles greffés sont aussi moins vulnérables aux contractions excentriques que les muscles mdx non greffés.Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a hereditary dystrophy that results from a mutation of the dystrophin gene, which induces the weakness of muscles. Although several studies have already shown that the transplantation of normal myoblasts permit to restore the expression of dystrophin, no physiological study was made to verify whether myoblast transplantation is able to improve the muscle contractile properties. In this study, I have studied the effects of normal myoblast transplantation on the contractile properties of muscles of mdx mice, a model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. My studies have shown that the transplantation of normal myoblasts protects mdx muscle from damage induced by eccentric contractions, and that this effect can not be explained only by the expression of dystrophin. Indeed, the comparison of mdx muscles transplanted with mdx myoblasts with non-transplanted muscles indicated that the transplanted muscles are more resistant to eccentric contractions than the non-transplanted ones
Recommended from our members
Reproducibility of Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) Release Assays. A Systematic Review
RationaleInterferon gamma (IFN-γ) release assays for latent tuberculosis infection result in a larger-than-expected number of conversions and reversions in occupational screening programs, and reproducibility of test results is a concern.ObjectivesKnowledge of the relative contribution and extent of the individual sources of variability (immunological, preanalytical, or analytical) could help optimize testing protocols.MethodsWe performed a systematic review of studies published by October 2013 on all potential sources of variability of commercial IFN-γ release assays (QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T-SPOT.TB). The included studies assessed test variability under identical conditions and under different conditions (the latter both overall and stratified by individual sources of variability). Linear mixed effects models were used to estimate within-subject SD.Measurements and main resultsWe identified a total of 26 articles, including 7 studies analyzing variability under the same conditions, 10 studies analyzing variability with repeat testing over time under different conditions, and 19 studies reporting individual sources of variability. Most data were on QuantiFERON (only three studies on T-SPOT.TB). A considerable number of conversions and reversions were seen around the manufacturer-recommended cut-point. The estimated range of variability of IFN-γ response in QuantiFERON under identical conditions was ±0.47 IU/ml (coefficient of variation, 13%) and ±0.26 IU/ml (30%) for individuals with an initial IFN-γ response in the borderline range (0.25-0.80 IU/ml). The estimated range of variability in noncontrolled settings was substantially larger (±1.4 IU/ml; 60%). Blood volume inoculated into QuantiFERON tubes and preanalytic delay were identified as key sources of variability.ConclusionsThis systematic review shows substantial variability with repeat IFN-γ release assays testing even under identical conditions, suggesting that reversions and conversions around the existing cut-point should be interpreted with caution