2 research outputs found
Bifunctional MnO<sub>2</sub>‑Coated Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Hetero-structured Catalysts for Reversible Li‑O<sub>2</sub> Batteries
The structural design and synthesis
of effective cathode catalysts
are important concerns for achieving rechargeable Li-O<sub>2</sub> batteries. In this study, hexagonal Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> nanoplatelets
coated with MnO<sub>2</sub> were synthesized as bifunctional catalysts
for Li-O<sub>2</sub> batteries. The oxygen reduction reaction catalyst
(MnO<sub>2</sub>) was closely integrated on the surface of the oxygen
evolution reaction catalyst (hexagonal Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>) so that this hetero-structured catalyst (HSC) hybrid would show
bifunctional catalytic activity in Li-O<sub>2</sub> batteries. A facile
synthesis route was developed to form a unique HSC structure, with
{111} facet-exposed Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> decorated with perpendicularly
arranged MnO<sub>2</sub> flakes. The catalytic activity of the HSCs
was controlled by tuning the ratio of Co to Mn (the ratio of OER to
ORR catalysts) in the hybrids. With the optimized Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-to-MnO<sub>2</sub> ratio of 5:3, a Li-O<sub>2</sub> cell
containing the HSC showed remarkably enhanced electrochemical performance,
including discharge capacity, energy efficiency, and especially cycle
performance, compared to cells with a monofunctional catalyst and
a powder mixture of Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> and MnO<sub>2</sub>. The results demonstrate the feasibility of reversible Li-O<sub>2</sub> batteries with bifunctional catalyst hybrids
Lithium Superoxide Hydrolysis and Relevance to Li–O<sub>2</sub> Batteries
Fundamental understanding of reactions
of lithium peroxides and
superoxides is essential for the development of Li–O<sub>2</sub> batteries. In this context, an investigation is reported of the
hydrolysis of lithium superoxide, which has recently been synthesized
in a Li–O<sub>2</sub> battery. Surprisingly, the hydrolysis
of solid LiO<sub>2</sub> is significantly different from that of NaO<sub>2</sub> and KO<sub>2</sub>. Unlike KO<sub>2</sub> and NaO<sub>2</sub>, the hydrolysis of LiO<sub>2</sub> does not produce H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. Similarly, the reactivity of Li<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> toward water differs from LiO<sub>2</sub>, in that Li<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> results in H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> as a product.
The difference in the LiO<sub>2</sub> reactivity with water is due
to the more exothermic nature of the formation of LiOH and O<sub>2</sub> compared with the corresponding reactions of NaO<sub>2</sub> and
KO<sub>2</sub>. We also show that a titration method used in this
study, based on reaction of the discharge product with a TiÂ(IV)ÂOSO<sub>4</sub> solution, provides a useful diagnostic technique to provide
information on the composition of a discharge product in a Li–O<sub>2</sub> battery