2 research outputs found

    Bifunctional MnO<sub>2</sub>‑Coated Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Hetero-structured Catalysts for Reversible Li‑O<sub>2</sub> Batteries

    No full text
    The structural design and synthesis of effective cathode catalysts are important concerns for achieving rechargeable Li-O<sub>2</sub> batteries. In this study, hexagonal Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> nanoplatelets coated with MnO<sub>2</sub> were synthesized as bifunctional catalysts for Li-O<sub>2</sub> batteries. The oxygen reduction reaction catalyst (MnO<sub>2</sub>) was closely integrated on the surface of the oxygen evolution reaction catalyst (hexagonal Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>) so that this hetero-structured catalyst (HSC) hybrid would show bifunctional catalytic activity in Li-O<sub>2</sub> batteries. A facile synthesis route was developed to form a unique HSC structure, with {111} facet-exposed Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> decorated with perpendicularly arranged MnO<sub>2</sub> flakes. The catalytic activity of the HSCs was controlled by tuning the ratio of Co to Mn (the ratio of OER to ORR catalysts) in the hybrids. With the optimized Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-to-MnO<sub>2</sub> ratio of 5:3, a Li-O<sub>2</sub> cell containing the HSC showed remarkably enhanced electrochemical performance, including discharge capacity, energy efficiency, and especially cycle performance, compared to cells with a monofunctional catalyst and a powder mixture of Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> and MnO<sub>2</sub>. The results demonstrate the feasibility of reversible Li-O<sub>2</sub> batteries with bifunctional catalyst hybrids

    Lithium Superoxide Hydrolysis and Relevance to Li–O<sub>2</sub> Batteries

    No full text
    Fundamental understanding of reactions of lithium peroxides and superoxides is essential for the development of Li–O<sub>2</sub> batteries. In this context, an investigation is reported of the hydrolysis of lithium superoxide, which has recently been synthesized in a Li–O<sub>2</sub> battery. Surprisingly, the hydrolysis of solid LiO<sub>2</sub> is significantly different from that of NaO<sub>2</sub> and KO<sub>2</sub>. Unlike KO<sub>2</sub> and NaO<sub>2</sub>, the hydrolysis of LiO<sub>2</sub> does not produce H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. Similarly, the reactivity of Li<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> toward water differs from LiO<sub>2</sub>, in that Li<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> results in H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> as a product. The difference in the LiO<sub>2</sub> reactivity with water is due to the more exothermic nature of the formation of LiOH and O<sub>2</sub> compared with the corresponding reactions of NaO<sub>2</sub> and KO<sub>2</sub>. We also show that a titration method used in this study, based on reaction of the discharge product with a Ti­(IV)­OSO<sub>4</sub> solution, provides a useful diagnostic technique to provide information on the composition of a discharge product in a Li–O<sub>2</sub> battery
    corecore