STANDARDIZED LAPAROSCOPIC RIGHT EMICOLECTOMY TECHNIQUE FOR COLON CANCER

AIM: We analysed our experience of laparoscopic surgical treatment vs traditional surgery of right colon cancer. METHODS: A series of 27 patients was treated from January 2001 to December 2005 out of a total of 927 surgical colorectal operations in the same period (147 with the laparoscopic approach). Inclusion and exclusion criteria are reported. We compared this group with 25 patients treated by the same surgical group with open surgery. The mean operative time, the distance from the distal margin of resection, the number of lymphnodes, the mean period of canalization and the mean hospital stay are reported. RESULTS: In the laparoscopic group, the mean operative time was 124.8+/-36.3 min vs open surgery group of 94+/-23.6 min; the distance from the distal margin was 6.7+/-3.1 cm vs 6.4+/-2.1 cm; number of lymphnodes was 15.2+/-4.3 vs 18.7+/-2.9 nodes; and canalization 1.7+/-0.9 vs 2.7+/-0.7 days. The hospital stay was 6.8+/-1.7 vs 7.2+/-0.8 days. CONCLUSIONS: We consider laparoscopic right colon resection a safe procedure but it needs good laparoscopic practice and the observance of inclusion criteria

Acute syndesmotic injuries in ankle fractures: From diagnosis to treatment and current concepts

A stable and precise articulation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis maintains the tibiofibular relationship, and it is essential for normal motion of the ankle joint. The disruption of this joint is frequently accompanied by rotational ankle fracture, such as pronation-external rotation, and rarely occurs without ankle fracture. The diagnosis is not simple, and ideal management of the various presentations of syndesmotic injury remains controversial to this day. Anatomical restoration and stabilization of the disrupted tibiofibular syndesmosis is essential to improve functional outcomes. In such an injury, including inadequately treated, misdiagnosed and correctly diagnosed cases, a chronic pattern characterized by persistent ankle pain, function disability and early osteoarthritis can result. This paper reviews anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of this syndesmosis, the mechanism of its acute injury associated to fractures, radiological and arthroscopic diagnosis and surgical treatment

Traumatic triangular fibrocartilage complex tears: “State of the art” from diagnosis to treatment

Traumatic fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears are a common source of disabling ulnar sided wrist pain. Originally described by Palmer in 1981, our understanding of the anatomy and biomechanics of the TFCC, as well as of the diagnosis and treatment of its lesions, has been refined. The aim of this review was to summarize “the state of the art” on traumatic TFCC injuries from diagnosis to treatment

Early patient screening and intervention to address individual-level occupational factors (“Blue Flags”) in back disability

OBJECTIVE: To develop a consensus plan for research and practice to encourage routine clinician screening of occupational factors associated with long-term back disability. METHODS: A 3-day conference workshop including 21 leading researchers and clinicians (the "Decade of the Flags Working Group") was held to review the scientific evidence concerning clinical, occupational, and policy factors in back disability and the development of feasible assessment and intervention strategies. RESULTS: The Working Group identified seven workplace variables to include in early screening by clinicians: physical job demands, ability to modify work, job stress, workplace social support or dysfunction, job satisfaction, expectation for resuming work, and fear of re-injury. Five evaluation criteria for screening methods were established: reliability, predictive performance, feasibility, acceptability, and congruence with plausible interventions. An optimal screening method might include a stepped combination of questionnaire, interview, and worksite visit. Future research directions include improving available assessment methods, adopting simpler and more uniform conceptual frameworks, and tying screening results to plausible interventions. DISCUSSION:There is a clear indication that occupational factors influence back disability, but to expand clinician practices in this area will require that patient screening methods show greater conceptual clarity, feasibility, and linkages to viable options for interventio