Correction: Suppression of Abdominal Motor Activity during Swallowing in Cats and Humans.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128245.]

Suppression of Abdominal Motor Activity during Swallowing in Cats and Humans.

Diseases affecting pulmonary mechanics often result in changes to the coordination of swallow and breathing. We hypothesize that during times of increased intrathoracic pressure, swallow suppresses ongoing expiratory drive to ensure bolus transport through the esophagus. To this end, we sought to determine the effects of swallow on abdominal electromyographic (EMG) activity during expiratory threshold loading in anesthetized cats and in awake-healthy adult humans. Expiratory threshold loads were applied to recruit abdominal motor activity during breathing, and swallow was triggered by infusion of water into the mouth. In both anesthetized cats and humans, expiratory cycles which contained swallows had a significant reduction in abdominal EMG activity, and a greater percentage of swallows were produced during inspiration and/or respiratory phase transitions. These results suggest that: a) spinal expiratory motor pathways play an important role in the execution of swallow, and b) a more complex mechanical relationship exists between breathing and swallow than has previously been envisioned

Suppression of Abdominal Motor Activity during Swallowing in Cats and Humans - Table 1

<p><b>A</b>. Changes to inspiratory and expiratory EMG amplitude and duration comparing cycles with expiratory loading and expiratory loading with swallow. <b>B</b>. Changes to laryngeal, pharyngeal, and schluckatmung EMG amplitude during control swallows (rest breathing) and swallows during expiratory threshold loading.</p><p>Suppression of Abdominal Motor Activity during Swallowing in Cats and Humans - Table 1 </p

An example of swallowing in a young healthy male, and the abdominal suppression across the entire expiratory period.

<p>Note the small burst of abdominal activity at the beginning and the larger burst of abdominal activity at the end of the expiratory period was the consistent pattern.</p

Suppression of Abdominal Motor Activity during Swallowing in Cats and Humans - Fig 1

<p>A. Example of abdominal motor unit suppression with swallow. Note the positive wave on the esophageal pressure channel. This is indicative of the peristaltic wave during the esophageal phase of swallow. Swallow is denoted by the arrow, the first 2 cycles occurred on the inspiratory-expiratory phase transition, the third is during the inspiratory phase of breathing. B. Line graph depicting average change in abdominal EMG amplitude for each of the five animals. N denotes the expiratory cycle that contained the swallow, n-1 to n-3 are the three preceding expiratory cycles, and n+1 to n+4 are the four following expiratory cycles. Four of the five animals had evidence of a multi-cycle suppression. For this analysis only single swallows which had 3 respiratory cycles preceding and following the swallow were included in this analysis.</p

Test of lepton flavour universality using B0→D∗−τ+ντB^0 \to D^{*-}\tau^+\nu_{\tau} decays with hadronic τ\tau channels

The branching fraction $\mathcal{B}(B^0 \to D^{*-}\tau^+\nu_\tau)$ is measured relative to that of the normalisation mode $B^0 \to D^{*-}\pi^+\pi^-\pi^+$ using hadronic $\tau^+ \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^+(\pi^0)\bar{\nu}_\tau$ decays in proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected by the LHCb experiment, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2 fb$^{-1}$. The measured ratio is $\mathcal{B}(B^0 \to D^{*-}\tau^+\nu_\tau)/\mathcal{B}(B^0 \to D^{*-}\pi^+\pi^-\pi^+)= 1.70 \pm 0.10^{+0.11}_{-0.10}$, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is related to systematic effects. Using established branching fractions for the $B^0 \to D^{*-}\pi^+\pi^-\pi^+$ and $B^0 \to D^{*-} \mu^+\nu_\mu$ modes, the lepton universality test, $\mathcal{R}(D^{*-}) \equiv \mathcal{B}(B^0 \to D^{*-}\tau^+\nu_\tau)/\mathcal{B}(B^0 \to D^{*-} \mu^+\nu_\mu)$ is calculated, $$\mathcal{R}(D^{*-}) = 0.247 \pm 0.015 \pm 0.015 \pm 0.012\, ,$$ where the third uncertainty is due to the uncertainties on the external branching fractions. This result is consistent with the Standard Model prediction and with previous measurements.The branching fraction B(B0→D*-τ+ντ) is measured relative to that of the normalization mode B0→D*-π+π-π+ using hadronic τ+→π+π-π+(π0)ν¯τ decays in proton-proton collision data at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected by the LHCb experiment, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2  fb-1. The measured ratio is B(B0→D*-τ+ντ)/B(B0→D*-π+π-π+)=1.70±0.10-0.10+0.11, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is related to systematic effects. Using established branching fractions for the B0→D*-π+π-π+ and B0→D*-μ+νμ modes, the lepton universality test R(D*-)≡B(B0→D*-τ+ντ)/B(B0→D*-μ+νμ) is calculated, R(D*-)=0.247±0.015±0.015±0.012, where the third uncertainty is due to the uncertainties on the external branching fractions. This result is consistent with the Standard Model prediction and with previous measurements.The branching fraction $\mathcal{B}(B^0 \to D^{*-}\tau^+\nu_{\tau})$ is measured relative to that of the normalisation mode $B^0 \to D^{*-}\pi^+\pi^-\pi^+$ using hadronic $\tau^+ \to \pi^+\pi^-\pi^+(\pi^0)\bar{\nu}_{\tau}$ decays in proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected by the LHCb experiment, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2 fb$^{-1}$. The measured ratio is $\mathcal{B}(B^0 \to D^{*-}\tau^+\nu_{\tau})/\mathcal{B}(B^0 \to D^{*-}\pi^+\pi^-\pi^+)= 1.70 \pm 0.10^{+0.11}_{-0.10}$, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is related to systematic effects. Using established branching fractions for the $B^0 \to D^{*-}\pi^+\pi^-\pi^+$ and $B^0 \to D^{*-} \mu^+\nu_\mu$ modes, the lepton universality test, $\mathcal{R}(D^{*-}) \equiv \mathcal{B}(B^0 \to D^{*-}\tau^+\nu_{\tau})/\mathcal{B}(B^0 \to D^{*-} \mu^+\nu_\mu)$ is calculated, $$\mathcal{R}(D^{*-}) = 0.247 \pm 0.015 \pm 0.015 \pm 0.012\, ,$$ where the third uncertainty is due to the uncertainties on the external branching fractions. This result is consistent with the Standard Model prediction and with previous measurements