Generation and Surgical Analysis of Genetic Mouse Models to Study NF-κB-Driven Pathogenesis of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.

Enforced activation of NF-κB signaling can be achieved by constitutive NF-κB-inducing kinases, IKK2 and NIK, or via lymphoma-associated mutants of MYD88, CARD11, and CD79B. In order to model Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) in mice, conditional alleles for these proteins are combined with alleles targeting Cre recombinase expression in mature B cells. However, unopposed NF-κB signaling promotes plasmablast differentiation, and as a consequence the model system must be complemented with further mutations that block differentiation, such as Prdm1/BLIMP1 inactivation or overexpression of BCL6. Here, we describe the currently available tools for DLBCL models in mice and their relative advantages and drawbacks. Furthermore, we describe methods to monitor lymphomagenesis, using ultrasound tomography of the spleen, and the technique of partial splenectomy surgery with recovery. These powerful techniques allow paired comparison of individual lymphoma cases before and after interventions, including therapies, and to study the evolution of lymphoma over time. NF-κB activation also promotes widespread nodal involvement with lymphoma and we describe the post-mortem dissection of major nodal groups

Microscopic analysis of the localization of two chlorin-based photosensitizers in OSC19 tumors in the mouse oral cavity

Background and Objective The effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) is dependent on the localization of photosensitizer in the treatment volume at the time of illumination. Investigation of photosensitizer pharmacokinetics in and around the treatment volume aids in determining the optimal drug light interval for PDT. Materials and Methods In this paper we have investigated the distribution of the photosensitizers chlorin e(6) and Bremachlorin in the oral squamous cell carcinoma cell-line OSC19-Luc-Gfp in a tongue tumor, tumor boundary, invasive tumor boundary, and normal tongue tissue by the use of confocal microscopy of frozen sections. Tongues were harvested at t = [3, 4.5, 6, 24, 48] hours after injection. Results Both photosensitizers showed a decreasing fluorescence with increasing incubation time, and at all time points higher fluorescence was measured in tumor boundary than in tumor itself. For short incubation times, a higher fluorescence intensity was observed in the invasive tumor border and normal tissue compared to tumor tissue. Bremachlorin showed a small increase in tumor to normal ratio at 24 and 48 hours incubation time. Ce6 was undetectable at 48 hours. We did not find a correlation between photosensitizer localization and the presence of vasculature. Conclusion The modest tumor/tumor boundary to normal selectivity of between 1.2 and 2.5 exhibited by Bremachlorin 24 and 48 hours after administration may allow selective targeting of tongue tumors. Further studies investigating the relationship between Bremachlorin concentration and therapeutic efficacy PDT with long incubation times are warranted. Lasers Surg. Med. 46:224-234, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

Optical Image-guided Surgery-Where Do We Stand?

In cancer surgery, intra-operative assessment of the tumor-free margin, which is critical for the prognosis of the patient, relies on the visual appearance and palpation of the tumor. Optical imaging techniques provide real-time visualization of the tumor, warranting intra-operative image-guided surgery. Within this field, imaging in the near-infrared light spectrum offers two essential advantages: increased tissue penetration of light and an increased signal-to-background-ratio of contrast agents. In this article, we review the various techniques, contrast agents, and camera systems that are currently used for image-guided surgery. Furthermore, we provide an overview of the wide range of molecular contrast agents targeting specific hallmarks of cancer and we describe perspectives on its future use in cancer surgery