Overview of the current use of levosimendan in France: a prospective observational cohort study

Abstract Background Following the results of randomized controlled trials on levosimendan, French health authorities requested an update of the current use and side-effects of this medication on a national scale. Method The France-LEVO registry was a prospective observational cohort study reflecting the indications, dosing regimens, and side-effects of levosimendan, as well as patient outcomes over a year. Results The patients included ( n = 602) represented 29.6% of the national yearly use of levosimendan in France. They were treated for cardiogenic shock ( n = 250, 41.5%), decompensated heart failure ( n = 127, 21.1%), cardiac surgery-related low cardiac output prophylaxis and/or treatment ( n = 86, 14.3%), and weaning from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ( n = 82, 13.6%). They received 0.18 ± 0.07 µg/kg/min levosimendan over 26 ± 8 h. An initial bolus was administered in 45 patients (7.5%), 103 (17.1%) received repeated infusions, and 461 (76.6%) received inotropes and or vasoactive agents concomitantly. Hypotension was reported in 218 patients (36.2%), atrial fibrillation in 85 (14.1%), and serious adverse events in 17 (2.8%). 136 patients (22.6%) died in hospital, and 26 (4.3%) during the 90-day follow-up. Conclusions We observed that levosimendan was used in accordance with recent recommendations by French physicians. Hypotension and atrial fibrillation remained the most frequent side-effects, while serious adverse event potentially attributable to levosimendan were infrequent. The results suggest that this medication was safe and potentially associated with some benefit in the population studied

Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist for children on veno-venous ECMO.

peer reviewedNAVA may improve veno-venous ECMO weaning in children. This is a retrospective small series, describing for the first time proof-of-principle for the use of NAVA in children on VV ECMO. Six patients (age 1-48 months) needed veno-venous ECMO. Controlled conventional ventilation was replaced with assisted ventilation as soon as lung compliance improved, and could trigger initiation and termination of ventilation. NAVA was then initiated when diaphragmatic electrical activity (EAdi) allowed for triggering. NAVA was possible in all patients. Proportionate to EAdi (1.8-26 μV), initial peak inspiratory pressures ranged from 21 to 34 cm H(2)O, and the tidal volume (Vt) from 3 to 7 ml/kg. During weaning, peak pressures increased proportionally to EAdi increase (5.2-41 μV), with tidal volumes ranging from 6.6 to 8.6 ml/kg. ECMO was weaned after a median time of 1.75 days on NAVA. Following ECMO weaning, the median duration of mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit stay were 4.5 days, and 13.5 days, respectively. Survival to hospital discharge was 100%. In conclusion, combining NAVA to ECMO in paediatric respiratory failure is safe and feasible, and may help in a smoother ECMO weaning, since NAVA allows the patient to drive the ventilator and regulate Vt according to needs

Ann Intensive Care

Grown-up congenital heart (GUCH) patients represent a growing population with a high morbidity risk when undergoing reparative surgery. A main preoperative feature is right ventricular failure, which represents a risk factor for postoperative low cardiac output syndrome. Levosimendan has a potentially beneficial effect. This retrospective study included consecutive GUCH patients with surgeries in a tertiary cardiothoracic centre between 01-01-2013 and 01-10-2017, to test the hypothesis that the postoperative use of levosimendan might be associated with shorter time of mechanical ventilation, when compared with the use of milrinone. To adjust for bias related to the probability of treatment assignment, it uses the inverse propensity score weighting methodology. Overall 363 patients had GUCH surgeries during the study period, their mean age was 31.39 ± 15.31 years, 87 patients were eligible for analysis in the Levosimendan group and 117 in the Milrinone group. The propensity score used pre- and intraoperative variables and resulted in a good balance between covariates. The Levosimendan group included patients with higher preoperative risk scores, a higher prevalence of left and right ventricular failure, who required more often the addition of epinephrine, renal replacement therapy, prolonged mechanical ventilation and intensive care stay. However, after propensity score weighting, patients in the Levosimendan group had shorter durations of mechanical ventilation (average treatment effect - 37.59 h IQR [- 138.85 to - 19.13], p = 0.01) and intensive care stay (average treatment effect - 3.11 days IQR [- 10.03 to - 1.48], p = 0.009). The number of days of additional epinephrine support was shorter and the vasoactive inotropic scores lower. We report a beneficial effect in terms of duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care stay, and on inotropic requirements of the use of levosimendan following GUCH surgeries. The use of levosimendan in this setting requires validation at a larger scale

Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Pneumocystis Pneumonia of an Infant with AIDS

Pneumocystis pneumonia is a common complication of cellular immunosuppression and may trigger severe pulmonary complications. Rapid onset of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome is possible in infants infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We report here the case of a 13-week-old girl who was previously healthy presenting with altered immunity and refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) initially attributed to bacterial pneumonia. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) was initiated because her condition was poor. An HIV infection was later fortuitously diagnosed after accidental exposure of a nurse to the child’s urine. The mother had congenitally transmitted HIV to the child after late (undetected) infection during pregnancy. The lung lesions were finally attributed to Pneumocystis pneumonia. We prescribed combined antiretroviral, antibiotic, and steroid therapy aimed at preventing immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. VV-ECMO weaning progressed over 30 days to the time of decannulation, rapidly followed by extubation and hospital discharge. The case highlights the fact that rare curable causes of refractory pediatric ARDS should always be investigated early. VV-ECMO should not be excluded as an ARDS treatment for immunocompromised children

0344: Why levosimendan should be considered for the treatment of viral myocarditis in children

BackgroundAnimal studies showed that levosimendan protects cardiomyocytes against apoptotic cell death in acute viral myocarditis. In addition to its inotropic properties, levosimendan seems to prevent the detrimental effects of oxidative stress and to limit cardiomyocyte loss.AimTo analyze the outcome of children who received levosimendan for acute or fulminant viral myocarditis.Patients and methodsRetrospective single center study covering the period 2007- 2013. All children (<18 years) with viral myocarditis were treated, in association with epinephrine and/or milrinone, with a 24-hours infusion of levosimendan. Clinical, biological and echocardiographic evolutions were analyzed.ResultsBetween 2007 and 2013, 18 successive children were treated, 9 for acute myocarditis and 9 for fulminant myocarditis (according to the international clinicopathological classification). Median age was 4 years (1.1-11) and median weight was 15kg (10-40). BNP level significantly decreased 48 hours after the beginning of the infusion (4599ng/L [2698-9266] vs 1928ng/L [848-4557], p=0.05). No dialysis was necessary. Among the fulminant myocarditis group, 1 patient (11%) required early mechanical circulatory support with a limitation of care due to severe neurologic complications. 13 patients (72%) recovered a LVEF >55% (100% for the acute myocarditis group). 1 patient had heart transplantation 18 months later.ConlusionIn our experience, levosimendan was efficient for the inotropic support of acute and fulminant viral myocarditis. We believe that its cardioprotective effect enabled us to limit the use of mechanical assistance (only 11% of the fulminant forms) and allowed a recovering of the cardiac function for the majority of the patients. Although further clinical studies are needed to confirm these data, levosimendan should be systematically considered for the treatment of these critical patients

Single-centred experience with levosimendan in paediatric decompensated dilated cardiomyopathy

SummaryBackgroundChildren with dilated cardiomyopathy in advanced heart failure may spend a long time awaiting heart transplantation. Consequently, mechanical circulatory support is sometimes required as a bridge to transplantation. Levosimendan, a positive inotropic agent, has been reported to be safe and efficient for the treatment of paediatric heart failure.AimsTo report our experience with levosimendan in children with decompensated dilated cardiomyopathy.MethodsPaediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy on the transplant waiting list and with criteria for mechanical support were included in this single-centred retrospective study. Each patient received at least one 24-hour infusion of levosimendan before mechanical circulatory support was considered. Biological and echocardiographic data were analysed.ResultsSix patients were included over a 24-month period. The median age was 25.5months (7.7–34.2months); 82 infusions were performed. Median B-type natriuretic peptide concentration decreased significantly between days 0 and 2 (2443ng/L [1458–3819ng/L] vs 1358ng/L [1025–2534ng/L]; P=0.003). While only a trend was noted in left ventricular ejection fraction improvement (P=0.054 by Simpson's method and P=0.068 by the Teicholz method), the subaortic velocity time integral rose significantly between days 0 and 8 (12.8cm/s [10–14.5cm/s] vs 15.3cm/s [14.3–16.9cm/s]; P=0.041).ConclusionsLevosimendan seems to improve haemodynamics in children with decompensated dilated cardiomyopathy; repeated infusions may delay the need for mechanical circulatory support while awaiting heart transplantation. This therapeutic agent should be systematically considered in this setting, in addition to conventional inotropic drugs

Overview of the current use of levosimendan in France: a prospective observational cohort study

Abstract Background Following the results of randomized controlled trials on levosimendan, French health authorities requested an update of the current use and side-effects of this medication on a national scale. Method The France-LEVO registry was a prospective observational cohort study reflecting the indications, dosing regimens, and side-effects of levosimendan, as well as patient outcomes over a year. Results The patients included (n = 602) represented 29.6% of the national yearly use of levosimendan in France. They were treated for cardiogenic shock (n = 250, 41.5%), decompensated heart failure (n = 127, 21.1%), cardiac surgery-related low cardiac output prophylaxis and/or treatment (n = 86, 14.3%), and weaning from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 82, 13.6%). They received 0.18 ± 0.07 µg/kg/min levosimendan over 26 ± 8 h. An initial bolus was administered in 45 patients (7.5%), 103 (17.1%) received repeated infusions, and 461 (76.6%) received inotropes and or vasoactive agents concomitantly. Hypotension was reported in 218 patients (36.2%), atrial fibrillation in 85 (14.1%), and serious adverse events in 17 (2.8%). 136 patients (22.6%) died in hospital, and 26 (4.3%) during the 90-day follow-up. Conclusions We observed that levosimendan was used in accordance with recent recommendations by French physicians. Hypotension and atrial fibrillation remained the most frequent side-effects, while serious adverse event potentially attributable to levosimendan were infrequent. The results suggest that this medication was safe and potentially associated with some benefit in the population studied

Correction: Overview of the current use of levosimendan in France: a prospective observational cohort study

Correction: Annals of Intensive Care (2023) 13:69 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-023-01164-