13 research outputs found

    A contrast between children and adolescents with excellent and poor control: the T1D exchange clinic registry experience

    No full text
    ObjectivesOptimizing glycemic control in pediatric type 1 diabetes (T1D) is essential to minimizing long-term risk of complications. We used the T1D Exchange database from 58 US diabetes clinics to identify differences in diabetes management characteristics among children categorized as having excellent vs. poor glycemic control.MethodsAmong registry participants 6-17 yr old with diabetes duration ≥ 2 yr, those with excellent control [(A1c <7%)(53 mmol/mol) (N = 588)] were compared with those with poor control [(A1c ≥ 9% )(75 mmol/mol) (N = 2684)] using logistic regression.ResultsThe excellent and poor control groups differed substantially in diabetes management (p < 0.001 for all) with more of the excellent control group using insulin pumps, performing blood glucose monitoring ≥ 5 ×/d, missing fewer boluses, bolusing before meals rather than at the time of or after a meal, using meal-specific insulin:carbohydrate ratios, checking their blood glucose prior to giving meal time insulin, giving insulin for daytime snacks, giving more bolus insulin, and using a lower mean total daily insulin dose than those in poor control. After adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic factors, diabetes management characteristics were still strongly associated with good vs. poor control. Notably, frequency of severe hypoglycemia was similar between the groups while DKA was more common in the poorly controlled group.ConclusionsChildren with excellent glycemic control tend to exhibit markedly different diabetes self-management techniques than those with poor control. This knowledge may further inform diabetes care providers and patients about specific characteristics and behaviors that can be augmented to potentially improve glycemic control

    Five heterogeneous HbA1c trajectories from childhood to adulthood in youth with type 1 diabetes from three different continents: a group-based modeling approach

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES:Only a fraction of youth meet established targets for glycemic control; many experience deteriorating control over time. We compared trajectories of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) among youth from three trans-continental type 1 diabetes (T1D) registries and identified clinical variables associated with the odds of following increasing vs stable trajectories. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS:Analyses included longitudinal data from 15 897 individuals age 8 to 18 with T1D for at least 2 years and HbA1c measurements in at least 5 years during the observation period. Cohorts were selected from Australasian Diabetes Data Network (ADDN; Australia), German/Austrian/Luxembourgian Diabetes-Patienten-Verlaufsdokumentation initiative (DPV; Germany/Austria/Luxembourga), and the T1D Exchange Clinic Network (T1DX; US) clinic registries. Group-based trajectory modeling and multivariable logistic regression identified unique HbA1c trajectories and their predictors. RESULTS:Five heterogeneous trajectories of glycemic control in each registry were identified: low, intermediate, high stable; intermediate and high increasing. The overall HbA1c level for each trajectory group tended to be lowest in the DPV, higher in the ADDN, and highest in the T1DX. The absolute level of HbA1c and the proportion of individuals within each trajectory varied across registries: 17% to 22% of individuals followed an increasing trajectory. Compared with maintaining a stable trajectory, following an increasing trajectory was significantly associated with ethnic minority status, lower height z-score, higher BMI z-score, insulin injection therapy, and the occurrence of severe hypoglycemia; however, these factors were not consistent across the three registries. CONCLUSIONS:We report the first multinational registry-based comparison of glycemic control trajectories among youth with T1D from three continents and identify possible targets for intervention in those at risk of an increasing HbA1c trajectory.Mark A. Clements, Anke Schwandt, Kim C. Donaghue, Kellee Miller, Ursula Lück, Jennifer J. Couper ... et al

    Longitudinal trajectories of BMI z-score: an international comparison of 11,513 Australian, American and German/Austrian/Luxembourgian youth with type 1 diabetes

    No full text
    BACKGROUND:BMI fluctuations during puberty are common. Data on individual change in BMI from childhood to young adulthood are limited in youth with type 1 diabetes. OBJECTIVES:To compare longitudinal trajectories of body mass index z score (BMIz) from childhood to adolescence across three registries spanning five countries. METHODS:Data sources: T1DX (USA), DPV (Germany/Austria/Luxembourg) and ADDN (Australia). The analysis included 11,513 youth with type 1 diabetes, duration >1 year, at least one BMI measure at baseline (age 8-10 years) and >5 aggregated BMI measures by year of age during follow-up until age 17 years. BMIz was calculated based on WHO charts. Latent class growth modelling was used to identify subgroups following a similar trajectory of BMIz over time. RESULTS:Five distinct trajectories of BMIz were present in the T1DX and ADDN cohorts, while six trajectories were identified in the DPV cohort. Boys followed more often a low/near-normal pattern while elevated BMIz curves were more likely in girls (ADDN; DPV). For T1DX cohort, no sex differences were observed. Comparing the reference group (BMIz ~0) with the other groups during puberty, higher BMIz was significantly associated with older age at T1D onset, racial/ethnic minority and elevated HbA1c (all p<0.05). CONCLUSION:This multinational study presents unique BMIz trajectories in youth with T1D across three continents. The prevalence of overweight and the longitudinal persistence of overweight support the need for close monitoring of weight and nutrition in this population. The international and individual differences likely result from diverse genetic, environmental and therapeutic factors.Helen Phelan, Nicole C. Foster, Anke Schwandt, Jennifer J. Couper, Steven Willi, Peter Kroschwald ... et al

    Characteristics of adult‐ compared to childhood‐onset type 1 diabetes

    No full text
    Aims To compare diagnosis characteristics, diabetes management and comorbidities in a population diagnosed with type 1 diabetes in childhood with those in a similar population diagnosed in adulthood to identify disease differences related to the age of diabetes onset. Methods This analysis was performed using the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry, a cross‐sectional survivor cohort. Retrospectively collected characteristics were compared across the following age‐at‐diagnosis groups: <10, 10–17, 18–24, 25–39 and ≥40 years. Results The entire cohort included 20 660 participants [51% female, median (interquartile range) age 18 (14–36) years, 82% non‐Hispanic white]. Diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis was more common among those with onset in childhood. Participants diagnosed as adults were more likely to be overweight/obese at diagnosis and to have used oral agents preceding type 1 diabetes diagnosis (57%). Current insulin pump use was less frequent in participants diagnosed at older ages. Current glycaemic control, measured by HbA1c, insulin requirements and use of a continuous glucose monitor were not different by age at diagnosis. Coeliac disease was the only comorbidity that was observed to have a different frequency by age at diagnosis, being more common in the participants diagnosed at a younger age. Conclusions These results show differences and similarities between type 1 diabetes diagnosed in childhood vs adulthood; notably, there was a tendency for there was a higher frequency of diabetic ketoacidosis at onset in children and a higher frequency of use of oral antidiabetes agents in adults. The data indicate that there is little distinction between the clinical characteristics and outcomes of type 1 diabetes diagnosed in childhood vs adulthood. Optimizing glycaemic control remains a challenge in all age groups, with lower use of insulin pumps impacting those diagnosed as adults. What's new? Data obtained from a large database of autoimmune diabetes cases in the USA confirmed that treatment with oral agents before diagnosis, overweight/obesity, and absence of diabetic ketoacidosis were more frequent when diagnosis occurred in adulthood compared to childhood. HbA1c, use of continuous glucose monitoring, total daily insulin and other comorbidities were not associated with age at onset, while insulin pump use and coeliac disease were less common in adult‐onset diabetes. Once autoimmune diabetes is properly diagnosed and established there is little distinction between outcomes across ages at clinical diagnosis

    Severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis among youth with type 1 diabetes in the T1D Exchange clinic registry

    No full text
    ObjectiveSevere hypoglycemia (SH) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) are common serious acute complications of type 1 diabetes (T1D). The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of SH and DKA and identify factors related to their occurrence in the T1D Exchange pediatric and young adult cohort.Research design and methodsThe analysis included 13 487 participants in the T1D Exchange clinic registry aged 2 to &lt;26 yr with T1D ≥2 yr. Separate logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association of baseline demographic and clinical factors with the occurrence of SH or DKA in the prior 12 months.ResultsNon-White race, no private health insurance, and lower household income were associated with higher frequencies of both SH and DKA (p &lt; 0.001). SH frequency was highest in children &lt;6 yr old (p = 0.005), but across the age range, SH was not associated with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels after controlling for other factors (p = 0.72). DKA frequency was highest in adolescents (p &lt; 0.001) and associated with higher HbA1c (p &lt; 0.001).ConclusionsOur data show that poor glycemic control increases the risk of DKA but does not protect against SH in youth and young adults with type 1 diabetes. The high frequencies of SH and DKA observed in disadvantaged minorities with T1D highlight the need for targeted interventions and new treatment paradigms for patients in these high risk groups
    corecore