Direct Gene Expression Profile Prediction for Uveal Melanoma from Digital Cytopathology Images via Deep Learning and Salient Image Region Identification

Objective: To demonstrate that deep learning (DL) methods can produce robust prediction of gene expression profile (GEP) in uveal melanoma (UM) based on digital cytopathology images. Design: Evaluation of a diagnostic test or technology. Subjects, Participants, and Controls: Deidentified smeared cytology slides stained with hematoxylin and eosin obtained from a fine needle aspirated from UM. Methods: Digital whole-slide images were generated by fine-needle aspiration biopsies of UM tumors that underwent GEP testing. A multistage DL system was developed with automatic region-of-interest (ROI) extraction from digital cytopathology images, an attention-based neural network, ROI feature aggregation, and slide-level data augmentation. Main Outcome Measures: The ability of our DL system in predicting GEP on a slide (patient) level. Data were partitioned at the patient level (73% training; 27% testing). Results: In total, our study included 89 whole-slide images from 82 patients and 121 388 unique ROIs. The testing set included 24 slides from 24 patients (12 class 1 tumors; 12 class 2 tumors; 1 slide per patient). Our DL system for GEP prediction achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.944, an accuracy of 91.7%, a sensitivity of 91.7%, and a specificity of 91.7% on a slide-level analysis. The incorporation of slide-level feature aggregation and data augmentation produced a more predictive DL model (P = 0.0031). Conclusions: Our current work established a complete pipeline for GEP prediction in UM tumors: from automatic ROI extraction from digital cytopathology whole-slide images to slide-level predictions. Our DL system demonstrated robust performance and, if validated prospectively, could serve as an image-based alternative to GEP testing

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field