244 research outputs found
A Call to Action: Taking the Untenable out of Women Professors’ Pregnancy, Postpartum, and Caregiving Demands
Despite becoming increasingly represented in academic departments, women scholars face a
critical lack of support as they navigate demands pertaining to pregnancy, motherhood, and child
caregiving. In addition, cultural norms surrounding how faculty and academic leaders discuss
and talk about tenure, promotion, and career success have created pressure for women who wish
to grow their family and care for their children, leading to questions about whether it is possible
for these women to have a family and an academic career. The current paper is a call to action
for academia to build structures that support women professors as they navigate the complexities
of pregnancy, the postpartum period, and the caregiving demands of their children. We
specifically call on those of us in I-O psychology, management, and related departments to lead
the way. In making this call, we first present the realistic, moral, and financial cases for why this
issue needs to be at the forefront of discussions surrounding success in the academy. We then
discuss how in the U.S. and elsewhere, an absence of policies supporting women places two
groups of academics—department heads (as the leaders of departments who have discretion
outside of formal policies to make work better for women) and other faculty members (as
potential allies both in the department and within our professional organizations)—in a critical
position to enact support and change. We conclude with our boldest call—to make a cultural
shift that shatters the assumption that having a family is not compatible with academic success.
Combined, we seek to launch a discussion that leads directly to necessary and overdue changes
in how women scholars are supported in academia
Conceptualizing historical organization studies
© 2016 Academy of Management Review. The promise of a closer union between organizational and historical research has long been recognized. However, its potential remains unfulfilled: The authenticity of theory development expected by organization studies and the authenticity of historical veracity required by historical research place exceptional conceptual and empirical demands on researchers. We elaborate the idea of historical organization studies-organizational research that draws extensively on historical data, methods, and knowledge to promote historically informed theoretical narratives attentive to both disciplines. Building on prior research, we propose a typology of four differing conceptions of history in organizational research: History as evaluating, explicating, conceptualizing, and narrating. We identify five principles of historical organization studies-dual integrity, pluralistic understanding, representational truth, context sensitivity, and theoretical fluency-and illustrate our typology holistically from the perspective of institutional entrepreneurship. We explore practical avenues for a creative synthesis, drawing examples from social movement research and microhistory. Historically informed theoretical narratives whose validity derives from both historical veracity and conceptual rigor afford dual integrity that enhances scholarly legitimacy, enriching understanding of historical, contemporary, and future-directed social realities
Cloning and Characterization of Maize miRNAs Involved in Responses to Nitrogen Deficiency
Although recent studies indicated that miRNAs regulate plant adaptive responses to nutrient deprivation, the functional significance of miRNAs in adaptive responses to nitrogen (N) limitation remains to be explored. To elucidate the molecular biology underlying N sensing/signaling in maize, we constructed four small RNA libraries and one degradome from maize seedlings exposed to N deficiency. We discovered a total of 99 absolutely new loci belonging to 47 miRNA families by small RNA deep sequencing and degradome sequencing, as well as 9 new loci were the paralogs of previously reported miR169, miR171, and miR398, significantly expanding the reported 150 high confidence genes within 26 miRNA families in maize. Bioinformatic and subsequent small RNA northern blot analysis identified eight miRNA families (five conserved and three newly identified) differentially expressed under the N-deficient condition. Predicted and degradome-validated targets of the newly identified miRNAs suggest their involvement in a broad range of cellular responses and metabolic processes. Because maize is not only an important crop but is also a genetic model for basic biological research, our research contributes to the understanding of the regulatory roles of miRNAs in plant adaption to N-deficiency stress
On the visual detection of non-natural records in streamflow time series: challenges and impacts
Large datasets of long-term streamflow measurements are widely used to infer and model hydrological processes. However, streamflow measurements may
suffer from what users can consider anomalies, i.e. non-natural records that may be erroneous streamflow values or anthropogenic influences that
can lead to misinterpretation of actual hydrological processes. Since identifying anomalies is time consuming for humans, no study has investigated
their proportion, temporal distribution, and influence on hydrological indicators over large datasets. This study summarizes the results of a large
visual inspection campaign of 674Â streamflow time series in France made by 43Â evaluators, who were asked to identify anomalies falling under five
categories, namely, linear interpolation, drops, noise, point anomalies, and other. We examined the evaluators' individual behaviour in terms of
severity and agreement with other evaluators, as well as the temporal distributions of the anomalies and their influence on commonly used
hydrological indicators. We found that inter-evaluator agreement was surprisingly low, with an average of 12 % of overlapping periods reported as
anomalies. These anomalies were mostly identified as linear interpolation and noise, and they were more frequently reported during the low-flow
periods in summer. The impact of cleaning data from the identified anomaly values was higher on low-flow indicators than on high-flow indicators,
with change rates lower than 5 % most of the time. We conclude that the identification of anomalies in streamflow time series is highly dependent
on the aims and skills of each evaluator, which raises questions about the best practices to adopt for data cleaning.</p
Primary care multidisciplinary teams in practice: a qualitative study.
BACKGROUND: Current recommendations for strengthening the US healthcare system consider restructuring primary care into multidisciplinary teams as vital to improving quality and efficiency. Yet, approaches to the selection of team designs remain unclear. This project describes current primary care team designs, primary care professionals' perceptions of ideal team designs, and perceived facilitating factors and barriers to implementing ideal team-based care. METHODS: Qualitative study of 44 health care professionals at 6 primary care practices in North Carolina using focus group discussions and surveys. Data was analyzed using framework content analysis. RESULTS: Practices used a variety of multidisciplinary team designs with the specific design being influenced by the social and policy context in which practices were embedded. Practices overwhelmingly located barriers to adopting ideal multidisciplinary teams as being outside of their individual practices and outside of their control. Participants viewed internal organizational contexts as the major facilitators of multidisciplinary primary care teams. The majority of practices described their ideal team design as including a social worker to meet the needs of socially complex patients. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care multidisciplinary team designs vary across practices, shaped in part by contextual factors perceived as barriers outside of the practices' control. Facilitating factors within practices provide a culture of support to team members, but they are insufficient to overcome the perceived barriers. The common desire to add social workers to care teams reflects practices' struggles to meet the complex demands of patients and external agencies. Government or organizational policies should avoid one-size-fits-all approaches to multidisciplinary care teams, and instead allow primary care practices to adapt to their specific contextual circumstances.American Academy of Family Physicians Foundation’s Joint Grant Award Program [#G1401JG
Remuneração de Executivos e Desempenho no Mercado Brasileiro: Relações Contemporâneas e Defasadas
The small RNA diversity from Medicago truncatularoots under biotic interactions evidences the environmental plasticity of the miRNAome
- …