Transverse maxillary deficiency in Class II and Class III malocclusions: a cephalometric and morphometric study on postero-anterior films

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/71585/1/j.1601-6343.2004.00312.x.pd

Effect of RME and headgear treatment on the eruption of palatally displaced canines: a randomized clinical study.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of orthodontic treatment finalized on the maintenance/ improvement the upper arch perimeter to assist in the successful eruption of palatally displaced maxillary canines (PDCs). Materials and Methods: The randomized prospective design comprised 64 subjects with PDCs who were randomly assigned to one of three groups: cervical pull headgear (HG); rapid maxillary expansion and cervical pull headgear (RME/HG); or untreated control group (CG). Panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalograms were evaluated at the time of initial observation (T1) and after an average period of 18 months (T2). At T2 the success of canine eruption was evaluated. A superimposition study on lateral cephalograms was undertaken to evaluate the T1–T2 changes in the sagittal position of the upper molars in the three groups. Results: The prevalence of successful eruption was 85.7% in the RME/HG group and 82.3% in the HG group. Both these prevalence rates were significantly greater than the success rate in untreated control subjects (36%). The cephalometric superimposition study showed a significant mesial movement of the upper first molars in the CG compared with the HG and RME/HG groups. Conclusions: The use of rapid maxillary expansion and headgear (or headgear alone) in PDC cases increases the success rate of eruption of the canine significantly (almost three times more than in untreated controls). (Angle Orthod. 2011;81:370–374.

An RCT on treatment of palatally displaced canines with RME and/or a transpalatal arch

n/

Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: In this cephalometric investigation, we analyzed the treatment and posttreatment effects of an orthopedic protocol for Class III malocclusion consisting of a facial mask combined with a removable bite-block appliance. METHODS: The treated sample consisted of 22 Class III patients treated with the facial mask and bite-block protocol before the pubertal growth spurt (mean age, 8.9 +/- 1.5 years). Treated subjects were evaluated after facial mask and bite-block therapy and at a posttreatment observation in absence of retention. The treated group was compared with a matched control group of 12 untreated Class III subjects. All treated and control subjects were postpubertal at the final observation. Significant differences between the treated and control groups were assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test (P <0.05). RESULTS: Both angular and linear sagittal measurements of the maxilla showed significant improvements during active treatment. Significant improvements of SNA angle, ANB angle, overjet, and molar relationship remained stable during the posttreatment period. No significant effect was found in the mandibular skeletal measures. No significant protraction of the maxillary incisors or retraction of the mandibular incisors was observed. CONCLUSIONS: A bite-block appliance in the mandibular arch with a facial mask enabled effective control of mandibular rotation with progressive closure of the gonial angle. This added to the favorable maxillary outcomes of the treatment protocol. 2010 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved

Treatment and posttreatment skeletal effects of rapid maxillary expansion studied with low-dose computed tomography in growing subjects

Introduction: The aim of this study was to apply low-dose computed tomography (CT) to evaluate treatment and posttreatment effects produced by rapid maxillary expansion (RME) at the levels of the midpalatal suture and the pterygoid processes. Methods: A sample of 17 subjects (7 boys, 10 girls; mean age, 11.2 years) was analyzed. Multi-slice CT scans were taken before RME, at the end of the active expansion phase, and after a retention period of 6 months. Statistical analysis was performed with ANOVA for repeated measures with post-hoc tests. Results: The amounts of opening of the midpalatal suture during the active phase of expansion were 3.01, 2.17, and 1.15 mm for the anterior, middle, and posterior suture widths, respectively. Pterygoid width also showed a statistically significant increase (1.49 mm). In the postretention period, all transverse measurements had significant decreases except for pterygoid width. Conclusions: At the end of the retention phase after RME therapy, the transverse width of the midpalatal suture was similar to the pretreatment width, whereas the width between the pterygoid processes was significantly increased

Modifications of midpalatal sutural density induced by rapid maxillary expansion: A low-dose computed-tomography evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the density of the midpalatal suture as assessed by low-dose computed tomography (CT) before rapid maxillary expansion (RME) (T0), at the end of active expansion (T1), and after a retention period of 6 months (T2). METHODS: The study sample comprised 17 prepubertal subjects (mean age, 11.2 years) with constricted maxillary arches and unilateral or bilateral posterior crossbite. The total amount of expansion was 7 mm in all subjects. Multi-slice low-dose CT scans were taken at T0, T1, and T2. On axial CT scanned images, 4 regions of interest (ROIs) were placed along the midpalatal suture (anterior [AS ROI] and posterior [PS ROI]) and in 2 regions of palatal bone (anterior and posterior). Density was measured in Hounsfield units. The Mann-Whitney U test and Friedman analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc test were used (P <0.05). RESULTS: The densities in the AS and PS ROIs were significantly smaller than the reference bone densities before RME therapy. Both AS and PS ROIs showed significant decreases in density from T0 to T1, significant increases from T1 to T2, and no significant differences from T0 to T2. CONCLUSIONS: The effective opening of the midpalatal suture by RME in prepubertal subjects was associated with a significant decrease in sutural density. The sutural density after 6 months of retention post-RME indicated reorganization of the midpalatal suture, since it showed values similar to the pretreatment ones

Immediate and post-retention effects of rapid maxillary expansion investigated by computed tomography in growing patients

Objective: To determine by low-dose computed tomography (CT) protocol the dental and periodontal effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME). Materials and Methods: The sample comprised 17 subjects (7 males and 10 females), with a mean age at first observation of 11.2 years. Each patient underwent expansion of 7 mm. Multislice CT scans were taken before rapid palatal expansion (TO), at the end of the active expansion phase (T1), and after a retention period of 6 months (T2). On scanned images, measurements were performed at the dental and periodontal levels. Mean differences between measurements at TO, T1, and T2 were examined through analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures with post-hoc tests. Results: All interdental transverse measurements were significantly increased at both T1 and T2 with respect to TO. In the evaluation of T0-T1 changes, periodontal measurements were significant on the buccal aspect of banded teeth with a reduction in alveolar bone thickness corresponding to the mesial (-0.5 mm; P < .05) and distal (-0.4 mm; P < .05) roots of the right first molar and to the mesial root of the left first molar (-0.3 mm; P < .05). In the evaluation of overall T0-T2 changes, the lingual bone plate thickness of both first molars was found to be significantly increased (+0.6 mm; P < .05). Conclusions: RME therapy induces a significant increase in the transverse dimension of the maxillary arch in growing subjects without causing permanent injury to the periodontal bony support of anchoring teeth discernible on CT imaging. (Angle Orthod. 2009;79:24-29.