Treatment of chronic anterior shoulder dislocation by open reduction and simultaneous Bankart lesion repair

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Untreated chronic shoulder dislocation eventually leads to functional disability and pain. Open reduction with different fixation methods have been introduced for most chronic shoulder dislocation. We hypothesized that open reduction and simultaneous Bankart lesion repair in chronic anterior shoulder dislocation obviates the need for joint fixation and leads to better results than previously reported methods.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Eight patients with chronic anterior dislocation of shoulder underwent open reduction and capsulolabral complex repair after an average delay of 10 weeks from injury. Early motion was allowed the day after surgery in the safe position and the clinical and radiographic results were analyzed at an average follow-up of one year.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The average Rowe and Zarin's score was 86 points. Four out of eight shoulders were graded as excellent, three as good and one as fair (Rowe and Zarins system). All patients were able to perform their daily activities and they had either mild or no pain. Anterior active forward flexion loss averaged 18 degrees, external active rotation loss averaged 17.5 degrees and internal active rotation loss averaged 3 vertebral body levels. Mild degenerative joint changes were noted in one patient.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The results show that the overall prognosis for this method of operation is more favorable than the previously reported methods and we recommend concomitant open reduction and capsulolabral complex repair for the treatment of old anterior shoulder dislocation.</p> <p>Level of Evidence</p> <p>Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, or historical, control group])</p

The Sigma-trial protocol: a prospective double-blind multi-centre comparison of laparoscopic versus open elective sigmoid resection in patients with symptomatic diverticulitis

BACKGROUND: Diverticulosis is a common disease in the western society with an incidence of 33-66%. 10-25% of these patients will develop diverticulitis. In order to prevent a high-risk acute operation it is advised to perform elective sigmoid resection after two episodes of diverticulitis in the elderly patient or after one episode in the younger ( 50 years or in case of progressive abdominal complaints due to strictures caused by a previous episode of diverticulits. The diagnosis is confirmed by CT-scan, barium enema and/or coloscopy.It is required that the participating surgeons have performed at least 15 laparoscopic and open sigmoid resections. Open resection is performed by median laparotomy, laparoscopic resection is approached by 4 or 5 cannula. Sigmoid and colon which contain serosal changes or induration are removed and a tension free anastomosis is created. After completion of either surgical procedure an opaque dressing will be used, covering from 10 cm above the umbilicus to the pubic bone. Surgery details will be kept separate from the patient's notes.Primary endpoints are the postoperative morbidity and mortality. We divided morbidity in minor (e.g. wound infection), major (e.g. anastomotic leakage) and late (e.g. incisional hernias) complications, data will be collected during hospital stay and after six weeks and six months postoperative. Secondary endpoints are the operative and the postoperative recovery data. Operative data include duration of the operation, blood loss and conversion to laparotomy. Post operative recovery consists of return to normal diet, pain, analgesics, general health (SF-36 questionnaire) and duration of hospital stay. DISCUSSION: The Sigma-trial is a prospective, multi-center, double-blind, randomized study to define the role of laparoscopic sigmoid resection in patients with symptomatic diverticuliti

[Immediate postoperative complications after a laparoscopic partial posterior fundoplication. Early laparoscopic reoperation]

Aim of the study: The immediate postoperative course of laparoscopic partial posterior fundoplication can be complicated by severe dysphagia or paraesophageal hernia. The aim of this study was to describe the technical causes of these complications. Patients and method: Four patients, operated for gastroesophageal reflux disease by laparoscopic partial posterior fundoplication, developed severe dysphagia (n = 2) or paraesophageal hernia (n = 2) during the immediate postoperative period. A barium swallow examination visualized the complication in both cases of dysphagia and in 1 case of paraesophageal hernia. The correct diagnosis was established by CT scan in the other case of paraesophageal hernia. Reoperations were performed by laparoscopy, 3 days (n = 2) or 6 days (n = 2) postoperatively. Results: Dysphagia was due to compression of the esophagus against the hiatus by the fundoplication. A new and looser fundoplication was easily performed. Dysphagia was no longer present postoperatively. The two patients were symptom-free after 6 and 12 months of follow-up, respectively. In the cases of paraesophageal hernia, the bottoms of the crura were torn. In the patient reoperated 3 days postoperatively, the procedure was easily performed, the postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was symptom-free after a follow-up of 20 months. In the patient reoperated 6 days postoperatively, the upper part of the stomach had moved into the left pleural cavity, the procedure was difficult due to inflammation and thickening of the gastric wall, and the postoperative course was uneventful, but reflux recurred 18 months later. Conclusion: When severe dysphagia or paraesophageal hernia occurs during the immediate postoperative course of laparoscopic partial posterior fundoplication, reoperation, possibly by laparoscopy, identifies and cures the technical defects. Based on our experience, we suggest that surgical cure of paraesophageal hernia is easier when performed during the immediate postoperative perio

Endoscopic transmural management of abdominal fluid collection following gastrointestinal, bariatric, and hepato-bilio-pancreatic surgery

Background: Post-operative collections are a recognized source of morbidity after abdominal surgery. Percutaneous drainage is currently considered the standard treatment but not all collections are accessible using this method. Since the adoption of EUS, endoscopic transmural drainage has become an attractive option in the management of such complications. The present study aimed to assess the efficacy, safety and modalities of endoscopic transmural drainage in the treatment of post-operative collections. Methods: Data of all patients referred to our dedicated multidisciplinary facility from 2014 to 2017 for endoscopic drainage of symptomatic post-operative collections after failure of percutaneous drainage or when it was deemed impossible, were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Thirty-two patients (17 males and 15 females) with a median age of 53 years old (range 31-74) were included. Collections resulted from pancreatic (n = 10), colorectal (n = 6), bariatric (n = 5), and other type of surgery (n = 11). Collection size was less than 5 cm in diameter in 10 (31%), between 5 and 10 cm in 17 (53%) ,and more than 10 cm in 5 (16%) patients. The median time from surgery to endoscopic drainage was 38 days (range 6-360). Eight (25%) patients underwent endoscopic guided drainage whereas 24 (75%) patients underwent EUS-guided drainage. Technical success was 100% and clinical success was achieved in 30 (93.4%) after a mean follow-up of 13.5 months (1.2-24.8). Overall complication was 12.5% including four patients who bled following trans-gastric drainage treated with conservative therapy. Conclusions: The present series suggests that endoscopic transmural drainage represents an interesting alternative in the treatment of post-operative collection when percutaneous drainage is not possible or fails

Specific features of colorectal cancer in patients with metabolic syndrome: a matched case-control analysis of 772 patients

Purpose: Although association between colorectal cancer (CRC) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) is established, specific features of CRC arising in patients presenting with MetS have not been clearly identified. Method: All patients who underwent colectomy for CRC from January 2005 to December 2014 at Institut Mutualiste Montsouris were identified from a prospectively collected database and characteristics were compared in the entire population and in a 1:2 matched case-control analysis [variables on which matching was performed were CRC localization (right- or left-sided) and AJCC stage (0 to IV)]. Results: Out of the 772 identified patients, 98 (12.7%) presented with MetS. Entire population analysis revealed that CRC associated with MetS was more frequent in men (71.4 vs. 47.8%, p < 0.001), more often right-sided (71.4 vs. 50.4%, p < 0.001) and presented with less synchronous liver metastasis (4.1 vs. 8.7%, p = 0.002). Case-control analysis confirmed the gender association (p < 0.001) and showed HNPCC (p < 0.001) and history family of CRC (p = 0.010) to be significantly more frequent in Non-MetS patients. Conclusions: CRC associated with MetS is more frequent in men, more often right-sided, and presents with fewer synchronous metastasis. Further investigations should be designed in order to confirm these results and to enhance our knowledge of carcinogenesis related to MetS