Familial history of diabetes and clinical characteristics in Greek subjects with type 2 diabetes

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A lot of studies have showed an excess maternal transmission of type 2 diabetes (T2D). The aim, therefore, of the present study was to estimate the prevalence of familial history of T2D in Greek patients, and to evaluate its potential effect on the patient's metabolic control and the presence of diabetic complications.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A total of 1,473 T2D patients were recruited. Those with diabetic mothers, diabetic fathers, diabetic relatives other than parents and no known diabetic relatives, were considered separately.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The prevalence of diabetes in the mother, the father and relatives other than parents, was 27.7, 11.0 and 10.7%, respectively. Patients with paternal diabetes had a higher prevalence of hypertension (64.8 vs. 57.1%, P = 0.05) and lower LDL-cholesterol levels (115.12 ± 39.76 vs. 127.13 ± 46.53 mg/dl, P = 0.006) than patients with diabetes in the mother. Patients with familial diabetes were significantly younger (P < 0.001), with lower age at diabetes diagnosis (P < 0.001) than those without diabetic relatives. Patients with a diabetic parent had higher body mass index (BMI) (31.22 ± 5.87 vs. 30.67 ± 5.35 Kg/m², P = 0.08), higher prevalence of dyslipidemia (49.8 vs. 44.6%, P = 0.06) and retinopathy (17.9 vs. 14.5%, P = 0.08) compared with patients with no diabetic relatives. No difference in the degree of metabolic control and the prevalence of chronic complications were observed.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The present study showed an excess maternal transmission of T2D in a sample of Greek diabetic patients. However, no different influence was found between maternal and paternal diabetes on the clinical characteristics of diabetic patients except for LDL-cholesterol levels and presence of hypertension. The presence of a family history of diabetes resulted to an early onset of the disease to the offspring.</p

Once-daily basal insulin glargine versus thrice-daily prandial insulin lispro in people with type 2 diabetes on oral hypoglycaemic agents (APOLLO) : an open randomised controlled trial

Background: As type 2 diabetes mellitus progresses, oral hypoglycaemic agents often fail to maintain blood glucose control and insulin is needed. We investigated whether the addition of once-daily insulin glargine is non-inferior to three-times daily prandial insulin lispro in overall glycaemic control in adults with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus taking oral hypoglycaemic agents. Methods: In the 44-week, parallel, open study that was undertaken in 69 study sites across Europe and Australia, 418 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus that was inadequately controlled by oral hypoglycaemic agents were randomly assigned to either insulin glargine taken once daily at the same time every day or to insulin lispro administered three times per day. The primary objective was to compare the change in haemoglobin A1c from baseline to endpoint (week 44) between the two regimens. Randomisation was done with a central randomisation service. Analysis was per protocol. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00311818. Findings: 205 patients were randomly assigned to insulin glargine and 210 to insulin lispro. Mean haemoglobin A1c decrease in the insulin glargine group was -1·7% (from 8·7% [SD 1·0] to 7·0% [0·7]) and -1·9% in the insulin lispro group (from 8·7% [1·0] to 6·8% [0·9]), which was within the predefined limit of 0·4% for non-inferiority (difference=0·157; 95% Cl -0·008 to 0·322). 106 (57%) patients reached haemoglobin A1c of 7% or less in the glargine group and 131 (69%) in the lispro group. In the glargine group, the fall in mean fasting blood glucose (-4·3 [SD 2·3] mmol/L vs -1·8 [2·3] mmol/L; p<0·0001) and nocturnal blood glucose (-3·3 [2·8] mmol/L vs -2·6 [2·9] mmol/L; p=0·0041) was better than it was in the insulin lispro group, whereas insulin lispro better controlled postprandial blood glucose throughout the day (p<0·0001). The incidence of hypoglycaemic events was less with insulin glargine than with lispro (5·2 [95% CI 1·9-8·9] vs 24·0 [21-28] events per patient per year; p<0·0001). Respective mean weight gains were 3·01 (SD 4·33) kg and 3·54 (4·48) kg. The improvement of treatment satisfaction was greater for insulin glargine than for insulin lispro (mean difference 3·13; 95% CI 2·04-4·22). Interpretation: A therapeutic regimen involving the addition of either basal or prandial insulin analogue is equally effective in lowering haemoglobin A1c. We conclude that insulin glargine provides a simple and effective option that is more satisfactory to patients than is lispro for early initiation of insulin therapy, since it was associated with a lower risk of hypoglycaemia, fewer injections, less blood glucose self monitoring, and greater patient satisfaction than was insulin lispro. Funding: Sanofi-Aventis