Handheld Devices for Laparoscopic Surgery

Despite the well-known benefits of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to the patients, this surgical technique implies some technical challenges for surgeons. These technical limitations are increased with the introduction of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery. In order to overcome some of these technical difficulties, new handheld devices have been developed, providing improved functionalities along with precision-driven and articulating instrument tips. In this chapter, we will review the current status of handheld devices for laparoscopy and LESS surgery. Devices that provide additional and innovative functionalities in comparison with conventional surgical instruments will be considered. Results will be based on studies published in the scientific literature and our experience. These surgical devices will be organized into two main groups, mechanical devices and robotic-driven devices. In general, these instruments intend to simulate the dexterity of movements of a human wrist. Mechanical devices are cheaper and easier to develop, so most of the available handheld instruments fall into this category. The majority of the robotic-driven devices are needle holders with an articulating tip, controlled by an interface implemented on the instrument handle. In general, these handheld devices claim to offer an enhancement of dexterity, precision, and ergonomics

COVID-19. Pandemic surgery guidance

Abstract – Based on high quality surgery and scientific data, scientists and surgeons are committed to protecting patients as well as healthcare staff and hereby provide this Guidance to address the special issues circumstances related to the exponential spread of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during this pandemic. As a basis, the authors used the British Intercollegiate General Surgery Guidance as well as recommendations from the USA, Asia, and Italy. The aim is to take responsibility and to provide guidance for surgery during the COVID-19 crisis in a simplified way addressing the practice of surgery, healthcare staff and patient safety and care. It is the responsibility of scientists and the surgical team to specify what is needed for the protection of patients and the affiliated healthcare team. During crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the responsibility and duty to provide the necessary resources such as filters, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) consisting of gloves, fluid resistant (Type IIR) surgical face masks (FRSM), filtering face pieces, class 3 (FFP3 masks), face shields and gowns (plastic ponchos), is typically left up to the hospital administration and government. Various scientists and clinicians from disparate specialties provided a Pandemic Surgery Guidance for surgical procedures by distinct surgical disciplines such as numerous cancer surgery disciplines, cardiothoracic surgery, ENT, eye, dermatology, emergency, endocrine surgery, general surgery, gynecology, neurosurgery, orthopedics, pediatric surgery, reconstructive and plastic surgery, surgical critical care, transplantation surgery, trauma surgery and urology, performing different surgeries, as well as laparoscopy, thoracoscopy and endoscopy. Any suggestions and corrections from colleagues will be very welcome as we are all involved and locked in a rapidly evolving process on increasing COVID-19 knowledg

European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery

Laparoscopic surgery changed the management of numerous surgical conditions. It was associated with many advantages over open surgery, such as decreased postoperative pain, faster recovery, shorter hospital stay and excellent cosmesis. Since two decades single-incision endoscopic surgery (SIES) was introduced to the surgical community. SIES could possibly result in even better postoperative outcomes than multi-port laparoscopic surgery, especially concerning cosmetic outcomes and pain. However, the single-incision surgical procedure is associated with quite some challenges.This article is freely available via Open Access, click on the Publisher's URL to access the full-text.Publishe

The use of virtual reality simulation to determine potential for endoscopic surgery skill acquisition

Background: Efficient acquisition of endoscopic technique is essential for high-level care in surgical practice. In contrast to similar substantial risk industries, there is no standard instrument capable of detecting the potential of surgical residency candidates to develop such skills. Material and methods: We used the Simbionix "Lapmentor" Virtual reality simulator basic skills tasks 1, 5 and 6 to establish baseline performance of 17 subjects lacking surgical experience, then divided them into two groups. One group trained on the Lapmentor, a validated trainer. The second group trained on a video box trainer using 3 FLS tasks, which correlate with real OR performance. After completing the training program, each group was tested on its training modality and correlations were sought between performance in the screening tasks and final scores in both groups. Results: Time in Lapmentor task 1 showed significant correlations with total FLS scores (R 0.807 P 0.015), in addition to other benchmark parameters. With the Lapmentor group, time on task 5 demonstrated correlation with itself on the final scores (R 0.794 P 0.011). Conclusions: Time in the Lapmentor task 1 demonstrates correlations with FLS scores, which translate to better OR performance. The Lapmentor thus shows potential to be used as a screening test for surgical talent

Endoscopically stapled diverticulostomy for Zenker's diverticulum: results of a multidisciplinary team approach

Abstract Background A variety of open and endoscopic surgical approaches for the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum have been described. In recent years, growing evidence has shown that the endoscopic techniques are superior to the open approaches in many aspects. Among the endoscopic techniques, endoscopically stapled diverticulostomy (ESD) appears to have better efficacy and safety than the other endoscopic techniques. Methods This study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all the patients with Zenker's diverticulum treated surgically by the same team, which involved an ear, nose, and throat surgeon and an endoscopic surgeon. Results From January 2002 to March 2008, 55 consecutive patients with Zenker's diverticulum underwent 60 ESDs. The mean follow-up time was 32.6 months (range, 1-72 months). The mean operative time was 21.8 min (range, 5-45 min), and the average hospital stay was 2.24 days (range, 1-30 days). The treatment was technically feasible for 51 patients (93%), and initial symptom relief without recurrence was achieved for 46 patients (90.2%) after a single procedure. Five patients with recurrent symptoms underwent a successful revision ESD, with a 100% success rate among the patients for whom the procedure was technically feasible. Only two major postoperative complications (3.64%) occurred: one esophageal perforation and pneumomediastinum and one severe esophageal edema. Both patients had complete resolution of their complications with conservative treatment and no long-term sequela. Conclusion The findings showed endoscopic stapled diverticulostomy to be both safe and effective. Compared with the historical results of open diverticulectomy and myotomy, the reported procedure has fewer complications and better outcomes and should become the procedure of choice for the treatment of most patients with a diagnosis of Zenker's diverticulum

Endoluminal compression clip: full-thickness resection of the mesenteric bowel wall in a porcine model

Background: Performing a full-thickness intestinal wall resection Of a sessile polyp located on the mesenteric side with a compression clip may lead to compression of mesenteric vessels. The application of such a clip may therefore cause a compromised blood supply in the particular bowel segment, leading to perforation. Objective: To evaluate the performance of a newly developed, nitinol compression clip, called the NiTi clamp, for full-thickness resection of the bowel wall, while the clip is deliberately deployed endoluminally on the mesenteric side. Design: Prospective animal study. Multinational, multidiciplinary; gastroenterology and general surgery, research Cooperation. Setting: Animal research laboratory. Intervention: Six pigs were operated upon and endoscopically evaluated and then killed after 3 weeks. Linear compression closure clips based on nitinol springs were used. Three longitudinal enterotomies were performed: in the cecum, spiral colon, and proximal rectum. Four clips were deployed in each animal. Main Outcome Measurements: A total of 23 clips were deployed. The average expulsion day was 9 days. Results: All but 3 clips were normally expelled. One pig developed bowel ischemia due to intussusception. In endoscopic procedures, no signs of significant segmental mucosal ischemia were found. The macroscopic appearance of the compression closure lines was thin and delicate, but epithelialization was significantly delayed at 5 sites. Limitation: Differences between porcine and human colorectal anatomy. Conclusion: Full-thickness clamping of the bowel with the NiTi clamp, including the local mesenteric vasculature does not significantly impair local healing of the clamp site and gives hope to further development of novel full-thickness endoscopic resection technologies. (Gastrointest Endosc 2009;70:1146-57.

The Effects of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Surgery on the Gastrointestinal Tract

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is an emerging bariatric procedure, yet data on its effect on the gastrointestinal tract are lacking. This study sought to evaluate the incidence of small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) following OAGB; explore its effect on nutritional, gastrointestinal, and weight outcomes; and assess post-OABG occurrence of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) and altered gut microbiota composition. A prospective pilot cohort study of patients who underwent primary-OAGB surgery is here reported. The pre-surgical and 6-months-post-surgery measurements included anthropometrics, glucose breath-tests, biochemical tests, gastrointestinal symptoms, quality-of-life, dietary intake, and fecal sample collection. Thirty-two patients (50% females, 44.5 ± 12.3 years) participated in this study, and 29 attended the 6-month follow-up visit. The mean excess weight loss at 6 months post-OAGB was 67.8 ± 21.2%. The glucose breath-test was negative in all pre-surgery and positive in 37.0% at 6 months (p = 0.004). Positive glucose breath-test was associated with lower reported dietary intake and folate levels and higher vitamin A deficiency rates (p ≤ 0.036). Fecal elastase-1 test (FE1) was negative for all pre-surgery and positive in 26.1% at 6 months (p = 0.500). Both alpha and beta diversity decreased at 6 months post-surgery compared to pre-surgery (p ≤ 0.026). Relatively high incidences of SIBO and PEI were observed at 6 months post-OAGB, which may explain some gastrointestinal symptoms and nutritional deficiencies