31 research outputs found

    Performance Scores in General Practice: A Comparison between the Clinical versus Medication-Based Approach to Identify Target Populations

    Get PDF
    CONTEXT: From one country to another, the pay-for-performance mechanisms differ on one significant point: the identification of target populations, that is, populations which serve as a basis for calculating the indicators. The aim of this study was to compare clinical versus medication-based identification of populations of patients with diabetes and hypertension over the age of 50 (for men) or 60 (for women), and any consequences this may have on the calculation of P4P indicators. METHODS: A comparative, retrospective, observational study was carried out with clinical and prescription data from a panel of general practitioners (GPs), the Observatory of General Medicine (OMG) for the year 2007. Two indicators regarding the prescription for statins and aspirin in these populations were calculated. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 21.690 patients collected by 61 GPs via electronic medical files. Following the clinical-based approach, 2.278 patients were diabetic, 8,271 had hypertension and 1.539 had both against respectively 1.730, 8.511 and 1.304 following the medication-based approach (% agreement = 96%, kappa = 0.69). The main reasons for these differences were: forgetting to code the morbidities in the clinical approach, not taking into account the population of patients who were given life style and diet rules only or taking into account patients for whom morbidities other than hypertension could justify the use of antihypertensive drugs in the medication-based approach. The mean (confidence interval) per doctor was 33.7% (31.5-35.9) for statin indicator and 38.4% (35.4-41.4) for aspirin indicator when the target populations were identified on the basis of clinical criteria whereas they were 37.9% (36.3-39.4) and 43.8% (41.4-46.3) on the basis of treatment criteria. CONCLUSION: The two approaches yield very "similar" scores but these scores cover different realities and offer food for thought on the possible usage of these indicators in the framework of P4P programmes

    Dynamic Local Distensibility of Living Arteries and its Relation to Wave Transmission

    Get PDF
    The dynamic local distensibility of the abdominal aorta was measured in 11 anesthetized dogs by recording simultaneously phasic pressure and instantaneous intravascular cross-sectional area, utilizing a special transducer. Axial motion of the vessel wall was recorded using a modification of the same transducer. A nonlinear relationship was found to exist between area and pressure in most cases studied. Fourier analysis was performed on data from eight experiments in order to obtain frequency characteristics of distensibility. In roughly half of the cases, Fourier analysis revealed that pressure variations displayed a phase lead over area variations for frequencies up to 10 Hz. This phenomenon was ascribed to viscoelastic properties of the vessel wall and the magnitude of the phase leads roughly matched those found in vitro by others. The behavior of the vessel wall in these instances was correctly predicted by the dynamic formula for distensibility, derived by others from wave transmission theory in which absence of axial wall motion is assumed. In these experiments, axial motion of the wall was found to be virtually absent. In the other half of the cases, the reverse situation was obtained: a phase lead of area variations over pressure variations for frequencies up to 15 Hz. In those cases a craniocaudal axial displacement of the vessel wall was observed with each systole, amounting to around 1 mm. The finding of the phase leads was partially explained by a dynamic formula for distensibility, developed by us from the theory of wave transmission in which free axial motion of the wall is a chosen boundary condition. The sign and order of magnitude of the phase leads were correctly predicted by the theoretical formula, but there was a disagreement on the frequency range in which they occurred. We concluded that additional forces, not yet considered in theoretical treatments, are operative on the aortic wall, which account for this lack of agreement. The frequency dependent properties of distensibility in vivo cannot be compared to those obtained in vitro in those cases in which there is axial displacement of the vessel wall of the same order of magnitude as the radial extensions
    corecore