A gene signature to predict high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and outcome in patients with triple-negative breast cancer

Background: In patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), the extent of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is associated with better prognosis. Our objective was to develop a gene signature frompretreatment samples to predict the extent of TILs after NACT and then to test its prognostic value on survival. Patients and methods: Using 99 pretreatment samples, we generated a four-gene signature associated with high post-NACT TILs. Prognostic value of the signature on distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) was first assessed on the training set (n=99) and then on an independent validation set (n=115). Results: A four-gene signature combining the expression levels of HLF, CXCL13, SULT1E1, and GBP1 was developed in baseline samples to predict the extent of lymphocytic infiltration after NACT. In a multivariate analysis performed on the training set, this signature was associated with DRFS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.28, for a one-unit increase in the value of the four-gene signature, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.13-0.63)]. In a multivariate analysis performed on an independent validation set, the four-gene signature was significantly associated with DRFS (HR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06-0.43). The four-gene signature added significant prognostic information when compared with the clinicopathologic pretreatment model (likelihood ratio test in the training set P=0.004 and in the validation set P=0.002). Conclusions: A four-gene signature predicts high levels of TILs after anthracycline-containing NACT and outcome in patients with TNBC and adds prognostic information to a clinicopathological model at diagnosis.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

The clonal origin and clonal evolution of epithelial tumours

While the origin of tumours, whether from one cell or many, has been a source of fascination for experimental oncologists for some time, in recent years there has been a veritable explosion of information about the clonal architecture of tumours and their antecedents, stimulated, in the main, by the ready accessibility of new molecular techniques. While most of these new results have apparently confirmed the monoclonal origin of human epithelial (and other) tumours, there are a significant number of studies in which this conclusion just cannot be made. Moreover, analysis of many articles show that the potential impact of such considerations as patch size and clonal evolution on determinations of clonality have largely been ignored, with the result that a number of these studies are confounded. However, the clonal architecture of preneoplastic lesions provide some interesting insights — many lesions which might have been hitherto regarded as hyperplasias are apparently clonal in derivation. If this is indeed true, it calls into some question our hopeful corollary that a monoclonal origin presages a neoplastic habitus. Finally, it is clear, for many reasons, that methods of analysis which involve the disaggregation of tissues, albeit microdissected, are far from ideal and we should be putting more effort into techniques where the clonal architecture of normal tissues, preneoplastic and preinvasive lesions and their derivative tumours can be directly visualized in situ