One-Year Analysis of the Prospective Multicenter SENTRY Clinical Trial: Safety and Effectiveness of the Novate Sentry Bioconvertible Inferior Vena Cava Filter

Purpose To prospectively assess the Sentry bioconvertible inferior vena cava (IVC) filter in patients requiring temporary protection against pulmonary embolism (PE). Materials and Methods At 23 sites, 129 patients with documented deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or PE, or at temporary risk of developing DVT or PE, unable to use anticoagulation were enrolled. The primary end point was clinical success, including successful filter deployment, freedom from new symptomatic PE through 60 days before filter bioconversion, and 6-month freedom from filter-related complications. Patients were monitored by means of radiography, computerized tomography (CT), and CT venography to assess filtering configuration through 60 days, filter bioconversion, and incidence of PE and filter-related complications through 12 months. Results Clinical success was achieved in 111 of 114 evaluable patients (97.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 92.5%–99.1%). The rate of freedom from new symptomatic PE through 60 days was 100% (n = 129, 95% CI 97.1%–100.0%), and there were no cases of PE through 12 months for either therapeutic or prophylactic indications. Two patients (1.6%) developed symptomatic caval thrombosis during the first month; neither experienced recurrence after successful interventions. There was no filter tilting, migration, embolization, fracture, or caval perforation by the filter, and no filter-related death through 12 months. Filter bioconversion was successful for 95.7% (110/115) at 6 months and for 96.4% (106/110) at 12 months. Conclusions The Sentry IVC filter provided safe and effective protection against PE, with a high rate of intended bioconversion and a low rate of device-related complications, through 12 months of imaging-intense follow-up

A Systematic Review on the Diagnosis of Pediatric Bacterial Pneumonia: When Gold Is Bronze

In developing countries, pneumonia is one of the leading causes of death in children under five years of age and hence timely and accurate diagnosis is critical. In North America, pneumonia is also a common source of childhood morbidity and occasionally mortality. Clinicians traditionally have used the chest radiograph as the gold standard in the diagnosis of pneumonia, but they are becoming increasingly aware that it is not ideal. Numerous studies have shown that chest radiography findings lack precision in defining the etiology of childhood pneumonia. There is no single test that reliably distinguishes bacterial from non-bacterial causes. These factors have resulted in clinicians historically using a combination of physical signs and chest radiographs as a 'gold standard', though this combination of tests has been shown to be imperfect for diagnosis and assigning treatment. The objectives of this systematic review are to: 1) identify and categorize studies that have used single or multiple tests as a gold standard for assessing accuracy of other tests, and 2) given the 'gold standard' used, determine the accuracy of these other tests for diagnosing childhood bacterial pneumonia.Search strategies were developed using a combination of subject headings and keywords adapted for 18 electronic bibliographic databases from inception to May 2008. Published studies were included if they: 1) included children one month to 18 years of age, 2) provided sufficient data regarding diagnostic accuracy to construct a 2x2 table, and 3) assessed the accuracy of one or more index tests as compared with other test(s) used as a 'gold standard'. The literature search revealed 5,989 references of which 256 were screened for inclusion, resulting in 25 studies that satisfied all inclusion criteria. The studies examined a range of bacterium types and assessed the accuracy of several combinations of diagnostic tests. Eleven different gold standards were studied in the 25 included studies. Criterion validity was calculated for fourteen different index tests using eleven different gold standards. The most common gold standard utilized was blood culture tests used in six studies. Fourteen different tests were measured as index tests. PCT was the most common measured in five studies each with a different gold standard.We have found that studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of clinical, radiological, and laboratory tests for bacterial childhood pneumonia have used a heterogeneous group of gold standards, and found, at least in part because of this, that index tests have widely different accuracies. These findings highlight the need for identifying a widely accepted gold standard for diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia in children

Using Midlevel Providers in Interventional Radiology

Developing and implementing clinical services, including consultations, rounds, and clinic, is time-consuming, and for the interventional radiologist this means time away from the interventional laboratory. Using a team approach to providing clinical services is logical, and the midlevel provider is a perfect fit for an interventional radiology team. Midlevel providers can be grouped into two categories, advanced practice nurses (APNs) and physician's assistants (PAs). Under the umbrella of APN are several specialties including the nurse practitioner (NP), clinical nurse specialist (CNS), certified nurse midwife, and certified nurse anesthetist. The midlevel providers that are particularly suited for interventional radiology are the NPs, CNSs, and PAs. This article discusses midlevel providers in-depth including skills, limitations, and expenses

Coding Issues for Interventional Radiology: Get Paid for What You Do!

As interventional radiology continues to evolve into a true clinical practice, more time will be spent on the clinical decision process; this time is reimbursable in the form of evaluation and management (E&M) services. Once assumed to be an inherent part of the procedure itself, we know many procedures now do not include follow-up E&M components. Unfortunately, E&M coding is somewhat complex and requires rigorous documentation. Below is a discussion of the fundamentals of E&M services, general principles of documentation, and the mechanics of coverage and reimbursement

Differentiating Pharmacologic Agents Used In Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis

The use of catheter-directed thrombolysis is a proven treatment for arterial ischemia, deep vein thrombosis, and severe pulmonary embolism. For arterial ischemia, thrombolysis has resulted in improved amputation-free survival and fewer subsequent surgeries to reestablish blood flow to the ischemic limb. The management of patients with thromboembolic diseases is complex, and the multiple thrombolytic drugs available to choose from compound this complexity. Although some believe the available thrombolytic agents are interchangeable, real biochemical differences exist that may prove otherwise. This article describes these pharmacologic differences and how they may affect the clinical practice of catheter-directed thrombolysis

Establishing Surveillance Clinics: The Road to Success

Interventional radiology interacts with all medical disciplines and historically has not had a patient base of its own. The specialty has depended upon referrals for procedures (often complex) and not referrals for the global management of the disease process or patient. Because of this, when referrers develop catheter-based skills, referrals to interventional radiology drop and competition for primary care physician referrals increase; a double strike. To compete, interventional radiology needs to offer clinical services to the primary care physician. One way to compete is by establishing particular disease surveillance programs. Below we discuss in detail the process of establishing surveillance clinics, which one worked for us, and the expected outcomes of these clinics

Clinical practice of interventional and cardiovascular radiology: current status, guidelines for resource allocation, future directions.

The practices of interventional radiology and interventional neuroradiology are centered on high-quality direct patient care. These subspecialties have long histories of innovative care that has often revolutionized the treatment of disease and illness. More recently, however, this success has brought about competition from former referring physicians as they have gained access to technology and training that will enable them to obtain credentials for procedures that were formerly in the exclusive domain of interventionalists. Unfortunately, many interventional radiologists find themselves ill-equipped to compete for referrals. This is primarily because many interventional radiology practices lack complete clinical practices, which are critically important in facilitating referrals from the nonspecialists. Accordingly, this document details the critical importance of a complete clinical practice and further outlines the steps required to achieve this goal