The effectiveness of an additive informal social network intervention for forensic psychiatric outpatients: results of a randomized controlled trial

ObjectivesA supportive social network is associated with better mental health and wellbeing, and less criminal behavior. Therefore, this study examined the effectiveness of an additive informal social network intervention to treatment as usual (TAU) among forensic psychiatric outpatients.Materials and methodsAn randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in forensic psychiatric care, allocating eligible outpatients (N = 102) to TAU with an additive informal social network intervention or TAU alone. Participants receiving the additive intervention were matched to a trained community volunteer over 12 months. TAU consisted of forensic care (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy and/or forensic flexible assertive community treatment). Follow-up assessments were conducted at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months after baseline. The primary outcome was the between-group effect on mental wellbeing at 12 months. Between-group effects on secondary outcomes (e.g., general psychiatric functioning, hospitalization, criminal behavior) were explored.ResultsIntention-to-treat analyses showed non-significant between-group effects on mental wellbeing on average over time and at 12 months. However, significant between-group effects were found on hospitalization duration and criminal behavior. Specifically, TAU participants were hospitalized 2.1 times more days within 12 months and 4.1 more days within 18 months than participants in the additive intervention. Furthermore, TAU participants reported 2.9 times more criminal behaviors on average over time. There were no significant effects on other outcomes. Exploratory analyses revealed that sex, comorbidity, and substance use disorders moderated effects.ConclusionThis is the first RCT examining the effectiveness of an additive informal social network intervention in forensic psychiatric outpatients. Although no improvements were found on mental wellbeing, the additive intervention was effective in reducing hospitalization and criminal behavior. The findings suggest that forensic outpatient treatment can be optimized by collaborating with informal care initiatives aimed at improving social networks within the community. Future research is warranted to determine which specific patients might benefit from the intervention and if effects can be improved by extending the intervention duration and enhancing patient compliance.Clinical Trial Registration: [https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NTR7163], identifier [NTR7163]

The effectiveness of an additive informal social network intervention for forensic psychiatric outpatients: results of a randomized controlled trial

Objectives: A supportive social network is associated with better mental health and wellbeing, and less criminal behavior. Therefore, this study examined the effectiveness of an additive informal social network intervention to treatment as usual (TAU) among forensic psychiatric outpatients. Materials and methods: An randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in forensic psychiatric care, allocating eligible outpatients (N = 102) to TAU with an additive informal social network intervention or TAU alone. Participants receiving the additive intervention were matched to a trained community volunteer over 12 months. TAU consisted of forensic care (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy and/or forensic flexible assertive community treatment). Follow-up assessments were conducted at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months after baseline. The primary outcome was the between-group effect on mental wellbeing at 12 months. Between-group effects on secondary outcomes (e.g., general psychiatric functioning, hospitalization, criminal behavior) were explored. Results: Intention-to-treat analyses showed non-significant between-group effects on mental wellbeing on average over time and at 12 months. However, significant between-group effects were found on hospitalization duration and criminal behavior. Specifically, TAU participants were hospitalized 2.1 times more days within 12 months and 4.1 more days within 18 months than participants in the additive intervention. Furthermore, TAU participants reported 2.9 times more criminal behaviors on average over time. There were no significant effects on other outcomes. Exploratory analyses revealed that sex, comorbidity, and substance use disorders moderated effects. Conclusion: This is the first RCT examining the effectiveness of an additive informal social network intervention in forensic psychiatric outpatients. Although no improvements were found on mental wellbeing, the additive intervention was effective in reducing hospitalization and criminal behavior. The findings suggest that forensic outpatient treatment can be optimized by collaborating with informal care initiatives aimed at improving social networks within the community. Future research is warranted to determine which specific patients might benefit from the intervention and if effects can be improved by extending the intervention duration and enhancing patient compliance. Clinical Trial Registration: [https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NTR7163], identifier [NTR7163]

Patients’ and volunteer coaches’ experiences with an informal social network intervention in forensic psychiatric care: a qualitative analysis

Abstract Background: Improving supportive social networks in forensic psychiatric patients is deemed important due to the protective effects of such networks on both mental health problems and criminal recidivism. Informal interventions targeted at social network enhancement by community volunteers showed positive effects in various patient and offender populations. However, these interventions have not specifically been studied in forensic psychiatric populations. Therefore, forensic psychiatric outpatients’ and volunteer coaches’ experiences with an informal social network intervention were explored in this study. Methods: This qualitative study was based on semi-structured interviews conducted alongside an RCT. Forensic outpatients allocated to the additive informal social network intervention, and volunteer coaches, were interviewed 12 months after baseline assessment. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify and report patterns in the data. Results: We included 22 patients and 14 coaches in the study. The analysis of interviews revealed five main themes reflecting patients’ and coaches’ experiences: (1) dealing with patient receptivity, (2) developing social bonds, (3) receiving social support, (4) achieving meaningful change, and (5) using a personalized approach. Patient receptivity, including willingness, attitudes, and timing, was a common reported barrier affecting patients’ engagement in the intervention. Both patients’ and coaches’ experiences confirmed that the intervention can be meaningful in developing new social bonds between them, in which patients received social support. Despite, experiences of meaningful and sustainable changes in patients’ social situations were not clearly demonstrated. Coaches’ experiences revealed broadened worldviews and an enhanced sense of fulfillment and purpose. Finally, a personalized, relationship-oriented rather than goal-oriented approach was feasible and preferable. Conclusion: This qualitative study showed positive experiences of both forensic psychiatric outpatients and volunteer coaches with an informal social network intervention in addition to forensic psychiatric care. Notwithstanding the limitations, the study suggests that these additive interventions provide an opportunity for forensic outpatients to experience new positive social interactions with individuals in the community, which can initiate personal development. Barriers and facilitators to engagement are discussed to improve further development and implementation of the intervention. Trial registration: This study is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR7163, registration date: 16/04/2018)

Forensic Psychiatric Outpatients' and Therapists' Perspectives on a Wearable Biocueing App (Sense-IT) as an Addition to Aggression Regulation Therapy: Qualitative Focus Group and Interview Study

Background: Given the increased use of smart devices and the advantages of individual behavioral monitoring and assessment over time, wearable sensor-based mobile health apps are expected to become an important part of future (forensic) mental health care. For successful implementation in clinical practice, consideration of barriers and facilitators is of utmost importance. Objective: The aim of this study was to provide insight into the perspectives of both psychiatric outpatients and therapists in a forensic setting on the use and implementation of the Sense-IT biocueing app in aggression regulation therapy. Methods: A combination of qualitative methods was used. First, we assessed the perspectives of forensic outpatients on the use of the Sense-IT biocueing app using semistructured interviews. Next, 2 focus groups with forensic therapists were conducted to gain a more in-depth understanding of their perspectives on facilitators of and barriers to implementation. Results: Forensic outpatients (n=21) and therapists (n=15) showed a primarily positive attitude toward the addition of the biocueing intervention to therapy, with increased interoceptive and emotional awareness as the most frequently mentioned advantage in both groups. In the semistructured interviews, patients mainly reported barriers related to technical or innovation problems (ie, connection and notification issues, perceived inaccuracy of the feedback, and limitations in the ability to personalize settings). In the focus groups with therapists, 92 facilitator and barrier codes were identified and categorized into technical or innovation level (n=13, 14%), individual therapist level (n=28, 30%), individual patient level (n=33, 36%), and environmental and organizational level (n=18, 20%). The predominant barriers were limitations in usability of the app, patients' motivation, and both therapists' and patients' knowledge and skills. Integration into treatment, expertise within the therapists' team, and provision of time and materials were identified as facilitators. Conclusions: The chances of successful implementation and continued use of sensor-based mobile health interventions such as the Sense-IT biocueing app can be increased by considering the barriers and facilitators from patients'and therapists' perspectives. Technical or innovation-related barriers such as usability issues should be addressed first. At the therapist level, increasing integration into daily routines and enhancing affinity with the intervention are highly recommended for successful implementation. Future research is expected to be focused on further development and personalization of biocueing interventions considering what works for whom at what time in line with the trend toward personalizing treatment interventions in mental health care

Additional file 1 of Patients’ and volunteer coaches’ experiences with an informal social network intervention in forensic psychiatric care: a qualitative analysis

Supplementary Material 1: Overview of themes and subthemes with additional illustrative quotation