A randomized, controlled trial comparing ganciclovir to ganciclovir plus foscarnet (each at half dose) for preemptive therapy of cytomegalovirus infection in transplant recipients

Forty-eight patients who provided 2 consecutive blood samples that tested positive for cytomegalovirus DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were randomized to receive either full-dose ganciclovir ( 5 mg/kg intravenously [iv] twice daily) or half-dose ganciclovir (5 mg/kg iv once daily) plus half-dose foscarnet (90 mg/kg iv once daily) for 14 days. In the ganciclovir arm, 17 (71%) of 24 patients reached the primary end point of being CMV negative by PCR within 14 days of initiation of therapy, compared with 12 (50%) of 24 patients in the ganciclovir-plus-foscarnet arm (P = .12). Toxicity was greater in the combination-therapy arm. In patients who failed to reach the primary end point, baseline virus load was 0.77 log(10) higher, the replication rate before therapy was faster (1.5 vs. 2.7 days), and the viral decay rate was slower (2.9 vs. 1.1 days) after therapy. Bivariable logistic regression models identified baseline virus load, bone-marrow transplantation, and doubling time and half-life of decay as the major factors affecting response to therapy within 14 days. This study did not support a synergistic effect of ganciclovir plus foscarnet in vivo

Controlled Trial of Azathioprine and Cyclosporin to Prevent Anti-LHA Antibodies due to Third-party Transfusion

Abstract. The beneficial effect of elective transfusion on renal allograft survival must be weighed against the risks of sensitisation. We report a randomised controlled trial in which patients in end-stage renal failure who were nonparous and not previously transplanted or transfused, were entered in a transfusion protocol during which one group received no drugs (controls), one received azathioprine, and one received cyclosporin. Each group was given three identical transfusions of leucocyte-enriched fresh blood at 2-3 week intervals. The transfused blood was of known HLA type and donor/recipient pairs were completely mismatched. Sensitisation rates were assessed by T and B cell cross-matches between donor and recipients and by the screening of all sera against lymphocytes from 40 random donors. Fifty-one patients have completed the protocol, 20 in the control group, 12 in the azathioprine group, and 19 in the cyclosporin group. The sensitisation rate in the control group was 30%, occasionally of high titre, and persistent. In the azathioprine group, 25% developed anti-HLA antibodies and reactivity was of high titre and was broadly specific. Sensitisation in the cyclosporin group was 10%, was narrowly specific, reacting with only 10% of a panel, and was transient. There was no difference in graft survival between the groups. We conclude that cyclosporin therapy concurrent with third-party transfusion reduces the incidence, titre, and duration of sensitisation