Brain Endothelial Cell-Cell Junctions: How to “Open” the Blood Brain Barrier

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a highly specialized structural and biochemical barrier that regulates the entry of blood-borne molecules into brain, and preserves ionic homeostasis within the brain microenvironment. BBB properties are primarily determined by junctional complexes between the cerebral endothelial cells. These complexes are comprised of tight and adherens junctions. Such restrictive angioarchitecture at the BBB reduces paracellular diffusion, while minimal vesicle transport activity in brain endothelial cells limits transcellular transport. Under normal conditions, this largely prevents the extravasation of large and small solutes (unless specific transporters are present) and prevents migration of any type of blood-borne cell. However, this is changed in many pathological conditions. There, BBB disruption (“opening”) can lead to increased paracellular permeability, allowing entry of leukocytes into brain tissue, but also contributing to edema formation. In parallel, there are changes in the endothelial pinocytotic vesicular system resulting in the uptake and transfer of fluid and macromolecules into brain parenchyma. This review highlights the route and possible factors involved in BBB disruption in a variety of neuropathological disorders (e.g. CNS inflammation, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy). It also summarizes proposed signal transduction pathways that may be involved in BBB “opening”

Connexin 43 gap junctions contribute to brain endothelial barrier hyperpermeability in familial cerebral cavernous malformations type III by modulating tight junction structure

Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154657/1/fsb2fj201700699r-sup-0003.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154657/2/fsb2fj201700699r.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154657/3/fsb2fj201700699r-sup-0002.pd

Systemic Delivery of an Adjuvant CXCR4-CXCL12 Signaling Inhibitor Encapsulated in Synthetic Protein Nanoparticles for Glioma Immunotherapy

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary brain cancer, with a 5 year survival of ∼5%. Challenges that hamper GBM therapeutic efficacy include (i) tumor heterogeneity, (ii) treatment resistance, (iii) immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), and (iv) the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The C-X-C motif chemokine ligand-12/C-X-C motif chemokine receptor-4 (CXCL12/CXCR4) signaling pathway is activated in GBM and is associated with tumor progression. Although the CXCR4 antagonist (AMD3100) has been proposed as an attractive anti-GBM therapeutic target, it has poor pharmacokinetic properties, and unfavorable bioavailability has hampered its clinical implementation. Thus, we developed synthetic protein nanoparticles (SPNPs) coated with the transcytotic peptide iRGD (AMD3100-SPNPs) to target the CXCL2/CXCR4 pathway in GBM via systemic delivery. We showed that AMD3100-SPNPs block CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling in three mouse and human GBM cell cultures in vitro and in a GBM mouse model in vivo. This results in (i) inhibition of GBM proliferation, (ii) reduced infiltration of CXCR4+ monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (M-MDSCs) into the TME, (iii) restoration of BBB integrity, and (iv) induction of immunogenic cell death (ICD), sensitizing the tumor to radiotherapy and leading to anti-GBM immunity. Additionally, we showed that combining AMD3100-SPNPs with radiation led to long-term survival, with ∼60% of GBM tumor-bearing mice remaining tumor free after rechallenging with a second GBM in the contralateral hemisphere. This was due to a sustained anti-GBM immunological memory response that prevented tumor recurrence without additional treatment. In view of the potent ICD induction and reprogrammed tumor microenvironment, this SPNP-mediated strategy has a significant clinical translation applicability.Fil: Alghamri, Mahmoud S.. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Banerjee, Kaushik. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Mujeeb, Anzar A.. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Mauser, Ava. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Taher, Ayman. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Thalla, Rohit. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: McClellan, Brandon L.. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Varela, Maria L.. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Stamatovic, Svetlana M.. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Martinez Revollar, Gabriela. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Andjelkovic, Anuska V.. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Gregory, Jason V.. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Kadiyala, Padma. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Calinescu, Alexandra. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Jiménez, Jennifer A.. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Apfelbaum, April A.. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Lawlor, Elizabeth R.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Carney, Stephen. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Comba, Andrea. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Faisal, Syed Mohd. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Barissi, Marcus. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Edwards, Marta B.. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Appelman, Henry. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Sun, Yilun. Case Western Reserve University; Estados UnidosFil: Gan, Jingyao. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Ackermann, Rose. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Schwendeman, Anna. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Candolfi, Marianela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas; ArgentinaFil: Olin, Michael R.. University of Minnesota; Estados UnidosFil: Lahann, Joerg. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Lowenstein, Pedro R.. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Castro, Maria G.. University of Michigan; Estados Unido

Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Pathogenesis: Investigating Lesion Formation and Progression with Animal Models

Cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM) is a cerebromicrovascular disease that affects up to 0.5% of the population. Vessel dilation, decreased endothelial cell–cell contact, and loss of junctional complexes lead to loss of brain endothelial barrier integrity and hemorrhagic lesion formation. Leakage of hemorrhagic lesions results in patient symptoms and complications, including seizures, epilepsy, focal headaches, and hemorrhagic stroke. CCMs are classified as sporadic (sCCM) or familial (fCCM), associated with loss-of-function mutations in KRIT1/CCM1, CCM2, and PDCD10/CCM3. Identifying the CCM proteins has thrust the field forward by (1) revealing cellular processes and signaling pathways underlying fCCM pathogenesis, and (2) facilitating the development of animal models to study CCM protein function. CCM animal models range from various murine models to zebrafish models, with each model providing unique insights into CCM lesion development and progression. Additionally, these animal models serve as preclinical models to study therapeutic options for CCM treatment. This review briefly summarizes CCM disease pathology and the molecular functions of the CCM proteins, followed by an in-depth discussion of animal models used to study CCM pathogenesis and developing therapeutics

20 kDa isoform of connexin-43 augments spatial reorganization of the brain endothelial junctional complex and lesion leakage in cerebral cavernous malformation type-3

Cerebral cavernous malformation type-3 (CCM3) is a type of brain vascular malformation caused by mutations in programmed cell death protein-10 (PDCD10). It is characterized by early life occurrence of hemorrhagic stroke and profound blood-brain barrier defects. The pathogenic mechanisms responsible for microvascular hyperpermeability and lesion progression in CCM3 are still largely unknown. The current study examined brain endothelial barrier structural defects formed in the absence of CCM3 in vivo and in vitro that may lead to CCM3 lesion leakage. We found significant upregulation of a 20 kDa isoform of connexin 43 (GJA1–20 k) in brain endothelial cells (BEC) in both non-leaky and leaky lesions, as well as in an in vitro CCM3 knockdown model (CCM3KD-BEC). Morphological, biochemical, FRET, and FRAP analyses of CCM3KD-BEC found GJA1–20 k regulates full-length GJA1 biogenesis, prompting uncontrolled gap junction growth. Furthermore, by binding to a tight junction scaffolding protein, ZO-1, GJA1–20 k interferes with Cx43/ZO-1 interactions and gap junction/tight junction crosstalk, promoting ZO-1 dissociation from tight junction complexes and diminishing claudin-5/ZO-1 interaction. As a consequence, the tight junction complex is destabilized, allowing “replacement” of tight junctions with gap junctions leading to increased brain endothelial barrier permeability. Modifying cellular levels of GJA1–20 k rescued brain endothelial barrier integrity re-establishing the spatial organization of gap and tight junctional complexes. This study highlights generation of potential defects at the CCM3-affected brain endothelial barrier which may underlie prolonged vascular leakiness

Modeling blood–brain barrier pathology in cerebrovascular disease in vitro: current and future paradigms

Abstract The complexity of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and neurovascular unit (NVU) was and still is a challenge to bridge. A highly selective, restrictive and dynamic barrier, formed at the interface of blood and brain, the BBB is a “gatekeeper” and guardian of brain homeostasis and it also acts as a “sensor” of pathological events in blood and brain. The majority of brain and cerebrovascular pathologies are associated with BBB dysfunction, where changes at the BBB can lead to or support disease development. Thus, an ultimate goal of BBB research is to develop competent and highly translational models to understand mechanisms of BBB/NVU pathology and enable discovery and development of therapeutic strategies to improve vascular health and for the efficient delivery of drugs. This review article focuses on the progress being made to model BBB injury in cerebrovascular diseases in vitro.http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173751/1/12987_2020_Article_202.pd