Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer diagnoses in general and specialized practices in Germany

International audienceThe aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on cancer diagnosis in general and specialized practices in Germany. This study included a total of 102,009 patients aged ≥18 years newly diagnosed with cancer in 1660 practices in Germany from January to May 2019 and from January to May 2020. Practices included general, gynecology, ear, nose, and throat (ENT), dermatology, and urology practices. New cancer diagnoses included all types of cancer and corresponded to cancers not previously documented in the database for a given patient. The number of new cancer diagnoses per general practice decreased significantly between March and May 2020 compared with the same period in 2019 (March: −12.0%, April: −27.6%, and May: −23.4%). A similar trend was observed in specialized practices, and this trend was more pronounced in April 2020 (dermatology: −44.4%, gynecology: −32.0%, and ENT: −28.2%). In addition, there was a significant decrease in almost all sex and age groups in April and May 2020 compared with the same period in 2019. Finally, the decrease in the number of new cancer diagnoses was particularly pronounced among cancers of the skin and the respiratory and intrathoracic organs. Together, these data show that the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant negative impact on cancer diagnosis in Germany, highlighting the need for public health measures improving the management of cancer in this country during this ongoing pandemic

Non-Guideline-concordant Treatment of Testicular Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Relapse-free Survival

The treatment of testicular cancer (TC) requires a multimodal approach. We retrospectively evaluated the diagnostic work-up, treatment, and outcomes of 131 patients with respect to the European Association of Urology guidelines. Of 131 patients, 18% had received non-guideline-concordant treatment, with under-treatment having a negative effect on relapse-free survival. Thus, implementation of guidelines is needed to decrease the mortality of TC. Introduction: The management of testicular cancer (TC) requires a complex multimodal therapeutic approach. Despite the availability of regularly updated guidelines, non-guideline-concordant treatment of TC still occurs. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the compliance patterns in diagnosis and therapy and their potential effects on patient outcomes with respect to the guidelines of the European Association of Urology. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 131 patients diagnosed with TC who had been referred to our department from September 2015 to October 2016. Patient characteristics were compared with European Association of Urology guideline recommendations. Results: Of the 131 primary treated patients, 23 (18%) had received a non-guideline-concordant treatment. The most common error was undertreatment (n = 12; 52%), mainly due to missing chemotherapy cycles. Overtreatment occurred in 30% of patients (n = 7); however, inappropriate treatment (n = 2; 9%) and misdiagnosis (n = 2; 9%) were rarely observed. In salvage therapy, non-guideline-concordant treatment was observed less frequently compared to patients receiving primary therapy (12% vs. 18%). Of the 131 patients, 35 developed a relapse, 23 of whom were treated correctly and 6 of whom were undertreated. Undertreatment of patients resulted in significantly reduced relapse-free survival compared with guideline-concordant management in primary treated patients (P = .005). Conclusion: Despite the standardization of treatment by interdisciplinary guidelines, its integration into daily practice remains limited. Undertreatment of TC patients is associated with significantly reduced relapse-free survival and should thus be avoided

A New Nomogram-Based Prediction Model for Postoperative Outcome after Sigmoid Resection for Diverticular Disease

Background and Objectives: Sigmoid resection still bears a considerable risk of complications. The primary aim was to evaluate and incorporate influencing factors of adverse perioperative outcomes following sigmoid resection into a nomogram-based prediction model. Materials and Methods: Patients from a prospectively maintained database (2004–2022) who underwent either elective or emergency sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease were enrolled. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to identify patient-specific, disease-related, or surgical factors and preoperative laboratory results that may predict postoperative outcome. Results: Overall morbidity and mortality rates were 41.3% and 3.55%, respectively, in 282 included patients. Logistic regression analysis revealed preoperative hemoglobin levels (p = 0.042), ASA classification (p = 0.040), type of surgical access (p = 0.014), and operative time (p = 0.049) as significant predictors of an eventful postoperative course and enabled the establishment of a dynamic nomogram. Postoperative length of hospital stay was influenced by low preoperative hemoglobin (p = 0.018), ASA class 4 (p = 0.002), immunosuppression (p = 0.010), emergency intervention (p = 0.024), and operative time (p = 0.010). Conclusions: A nomogram-based scoring tool will help stratify risk and reduce preventable complications