Assessment of enamel demineralization using conventional, digital, and digitized radiography Avaliação da desmineralização do esmalte por meio de radiografias convencional, digital e digitalizada

This experimental research aimed at evaluating the accuracy of enamel demineralization detection using conventional, digital, and digitized radiographs, as well as to compare radiographs and logarithmically contrast-enhanced subtraction images. Enamel subsurface demineralization was induced on one of the approximal surfaces of 49 sound third molars. Standardized radiographs of the teeth were taken prior to and after the demineralization phase with three digital systems - CygnusRay MPS®, DenOptix® and DIGORA® - and InSight® film. Three radiologists interpreted the pairs of conventional, digital, and digitized radiographs in two different occasions. Logarithmically contrast-enhanced subtraction images were examined by a fourth radiologist only once. Radiographic diagnosis was validated by cross-sectional microhardness profiling in the test areas of the approximal surfaces. Accuracy was estimated by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Chi-square test, at a significance level of 5%, was used to compare the areas under the ROC curves (Az) calculated for the different imaging modalities. Concerning the radiographs, the DenOptix® system (Az = 0.91) and conventional radiographs (Az = 0.90) presented the highest accuracy values compared with the other three radiographic modalities. However, logarithmically contrast-enhanced subtraction images (Az = 0.98) were significantly more accurate than conventional, digital, and digitized radiographs (p = 0.0000). It can be concluded that the DenOptix® system and conventional radiographs provide better performance for diagnosing enamel subsurface demineralization. Logarithmic subtraction significantly improves radiographic detection.<br>O objetivo desta pesquisa experimental foi investigar a acurácia da detecção de desmineralizações em esmalte por meio de radiografias convencionais, digitais e digitalizadas, e compará-las às imagens por subtração logarítmica. Foram induzidas desmineralizações subsuperficiais no esmalte de uma das faces proximais de 49 dentes terceiros molares hígidos. Radiografias padronizadas dos dentes foram obtidas antes e após a fase de desmineralização com o emprego de três sistemas digitais - CygnusRay MPS®, DenOptix® e DIGORA® - bem como do filme InSight®. Três radiologistas interpretaram os pares de radiografias convencionais, digitais e digitalizadas, em duas ocasiões diferentes. As imagens por subtração logarítmica foram avaliadas por um quarto radiologista apenas uma vez. O diagnóstico radiográfico foi validado pela mensuração da microdureza do esmalte seccionado longitudinalmente, nas áreas-teste das faces proximais. A acurácia foi estimada pela análise "Receiver Operating Characteristic" (ROC). Aplicou-se o teste Qui-Quadrado, em um nível de significância de 5%, para comparar as áreas sob as curvas ROC (Az) das diferentes modalidades de imagens radiográficas. Em se tratando das radiografias, o sistema DenOptix® (Az = 0,91) e as radiografias convencionais (Az = 0,90) apresentaram os maiores valores de acurácia em relação às outras três modalidades de imagem. No entanto, as imagens por subtração logarítmica (Az = 0,98) superaram as radiografias convencionais, digitais e digitalizadas (p = 0,0000). Conclui-se que o sistema DenOptix® e as radiografias convencionais demonstram melhor desempenho no diagnóstico das desmineralizações subsuperficiais em esmalte. A subtração logarítmica aprimora significativamente a detecção radiográfica

Detection of Artificial Occlusal Caries in a Phosphor Imaging Plate System with Two Types of LCD Monitors Versus Three Different Films

The aim of this study was to determine diagnostic performance of a storage phosphor plate system Digora® Optime (Soredex, Helsinki, Finland) with two types of LCD monitor in the detection of artificial caries when compared to Ultraspeed (D), Ektaspeed Plus (E), and Insight (F) radiographic films. Seventy extracted human molars—with artificial caries—were radiographed under identical standardized conditions using (1) a storage phosphor plate system Digora (Soredex, Helsinki, Finland), (2) Insight, (3) Ektaspeed Plus, and (4) Ultraspeed (Carestream Health Inc, Rochester, NY). All digital images and radiographs were examined by three observers for the presence or absence of artificial caries using a five-point confidence scale. Digital images were evaluated both on a LCD computer monitor (Philips 170S, Holland) and medical monitor—3 megapixel monochrome display (Me355i2, Totoku, Tokyo)—with brightness and contrast enhancement. Observer responses were evaluated using ROC analysis and other measurements for diagnostic accuracy. Storage phosphor images with medical monitor demonstrated higher mean Az values (0.70 ± 0.08) than digital images with computer monitor and conventional films. Storage phosphor images with medical monitor presented the highest score, 0.97, 0.90, 0.94, for each observer, respectively. Also, true positive observations (0.82) and positive likelihood ratios (2.71) were higher in enhanced storage phosphor images with medical monitor. Caries detection of mechanically created lesions by experienced radiologists is roughly comparable when examining D-speed film images and Digora images on both the computer and medical LCD monitors, and appears to be poorer on E- and F-speed film images